Browsing by Subject "Orthopaedic Surgery"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Complications and Outcomes Associated with Two-Stage Treatment of Periprosthetic Total Knee Infection
    (2022-07-22) Thomas, Jacob; Ziemba-Davis, Mary; Meneghini, R. Michael
    Background and Hypothesis: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is treated with implant resection, debridement, and component reimplantation after infection eradication. Treatment consists of either a single surgery or two-stage surgery with intravenous antibiotic therapy between stages. We replicated a recent study which concluded two-stage treatment is associated with high morbidity, hypothesizing that complication rates would be similar, but that morbidity is not always conclusively a consequence of two-stage treatment for PJI Project Methods: Prospectively documented data on all primary and revision knees undergoing two-stage treatment for PJI by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical complications were quantified for the interstage and post-reimplantation periods. Chi-squared tests were used to compare current findings to published findings. Results: Patient demographics and comorbidities were equivalent in the two studies (p ≥ .137). More complex infections characterized the current study as evidenced by significantly more polymicrobial infections (p < .001) and greater use of static spacers due to bone loss (p = .002). Nonetheless, only 1.5% of cases in the current study did not undergo component reimplantation compared to 7.8% in the comparison study (p = .129). There were no differences in the number of additional interstage and post-reimplantation septic surgeries (p ≥ .492). Using a proposed system which penalizes additional operations required to eradicate infection, treatment success rates at minimum one year follow-up were 64% and 71%, respectively (p = .473). Without these penalties, treatment success in the current study was 95.6% (equivalent proportion not available for comparison study). All-cause mortality was statistically equivalent in the two studies (15.6 versus 7.6%, p = .144) but no deaths from PJI were observed in the current study (unknown for comparison study). Potential Impact: Study findings suggest that morbidity attributed to two-stage treatment reflect the inherent complexity of this patient group, and not the two-stage treatment itself.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Complications and Outcomes Associated with Two-Stage Treatment of Periprosthetic Total Knee Infection
    (2024-04-19) Thomas, Jacob; Ziemba-Davis, Mary; Buller, Leonard T.; Meneghini, R. Michael
    Background: Chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been traditionally treated with two-stage revision. However, single-stage treatment is gaining popularity based on claims of decreased morbidity and mortality. This study sought to evaluate whether two-stage treatment for chronic knee PJI is associated with high morbidity and complication rates compared to existing literature. Methods: Prospectively collected data on all two-stage knee revisions were retrospectively reviewed (n=97). Modern perioperative optimization protocols were implemented during the interstage and post-reimplantation periods. Surgical complications were quantified for interstage and post-reimplantation periods. Chi-squared tests compared current findings to published data. Results: Patient sex and age were equivalent, with more current smokers in the present study (P=.001) and more renal failure (P=.002) in the comparison study. Infection complexity in the current study is indicated by 84% late chronic infections in compromised (McPherson) hosts (70%) with 14% polymicrobial infections (unknown for comparison). One percent of cases in the current study did not undergo component reimplantation compared to 8.2% in the comparison study (P=.015). There were no differences in interstage and post-reimplantation septic surgeries (P=.566). Within a year of reimplantation, 9% versus 29% underwent septic reoperation (P=.0002). Using a proposed system from the comparison study penalizing additional operations required to eradicate infection, treatment success rates at minimum one-year follow-up were 56% (current study) and 51% (comparison study) (P=.412). Without these penalties, treatment success in the current study was 64% (unknown for comparison). All-cause mortality rates were the same in both samples (13.4%); however, 9/13 deaths in the current study were unrelated to PJI (unknown for comparison). No patients in the current sample died within the first postoperative year compared to 6.7% in the comparison (P=.024). Conclusion: Study data suggest morbidity attributed to two-stage treatment for PJI reflects the inherent complexity of this patient group, and not the two-stage treatment itself.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Evidence-based Risk Stratification for Sport Medicine Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2020-10) Hinckel, Betina B.; Baumann, Charles A.; Ejnisman, Leandro; Cavinatto, Leonardo M.; Martusiewicz, Alexander; Tanaka, Miho J.; Tompkins, Marc; Marc, Seth L.; Chahla, Jorge A.; Frank, Rachel; Yamamoto, Guilherme L.; Bicos, James; Arendt, Liza; Fithian, Donald; Farr, Jack; Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine
    Orthopaedic practices have been markedly affected by the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the ban on elective procedures, it is impossible to define the medical urgency of a case solely on whether a case is on an elective surgery schedule. Orthopaedic surgical procedures should consider COVID-19-associated risks and an assimilation of all available disease dependent, disease independent, and logistical information that is tailored to each patient, institution, and region. Using an evidence-based risk stratification of clinical urgency, we provide a framework for prioritization of orthopaedic sport medicine procedures that encompasses such factors. This can be used to facilitate the risk-benefit assessment of the timing and setting of a procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic.