Browsing by Subject "IGNITE"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Developing a Common Framework for Evaluating the Implementation of Genomic Medicine Interventions in Clinical Care: The IGNITE Network’s Common Measures Working Group
    (Nature Publishing group, 2018-06) Orlando, Lori A.; Sperber, Nina R.; Voils, Corrine; Nichols, Marshall; Myers, Rachel A.; Wu, R. Ryanne; Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder; Levy, Kenneth D.; Levy, Mia; Pollin, Toni I.; Guan, Yue; Horowitz, Carol R.; Ramos, Michelle; Kimmel, Stephen E.; McDonough, Caitrin W.; Madden, Ebony B.; Damschroder, Laura J.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose Implementation research provides a structure for evaluating the clinical integration of genomic medicine interventions. This paper describes the Implementing GeNomics In PracTicE (IGNITE) Network’s efforts to promote: 1) a broader understanding of genomic medicine implementation research; and 2) the sharing of knowledge generated in the network. Methods To facilitate this goal the IGNITE Network Common Measures Working Group (CMG) members adopted the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide their approach to: identifying constructs and measures relevant to evaluating genomic medicine as a whole, standardizing data collection across projects, and combining data in a centralized resource for cross network analyses. Results CMG identified ten high-priority CFIR constructs as important for genomic medicine. Of those, eight didn’t have standardized measurement instruments. Therefore, we developed four survey tools to address this gap. In addition, we identified seven high-priority constructs related to patients, families, and communities that did not map to CFIR constructs. Both sets of constructs were combined to create a draft genomic medicine implementation model. Conclusion We developed processes to identify constructs deemed valuable for genomic medicine implementation and codified them in a model. These resources are freely available to facilitate knowledge generation and sharing across the field.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Drug–gene and drug–drug interactions associated with tramadol and codeine therapy in the INGENIOUS trial
    (Future Medicine, 2019-04) Fulton, Cathy R.; Zang, Yong; Desta, Zeruesenay; Rosenman, Marc B.; Holmes, Ann M.; Decker, Brian S.; Zhang, Yifei; Callaghan, John T.; Pratt, Victoria M.; Levy, Kenneth D.; Gufford, Brandon T.; Dexter, Paul R.; Skaar, Todd C.; Eadon, Michael T.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Tramadol and codeine are metabolized by CYP2D6 and are subject to drug-gene and drug-drug interactions. Methods: This interim analysis examined prescribing behavior and efficacy in 102 individuals prescribed tramadol or codeine while receiving pharmaco-genotyping as part of the INGENIOUS trial (NCT02297126). Results: Within 60 days of receiving tramadol or codeine, clinicians more frequently prescribed an alternative opioid in ultrarapid and poor metabolizers (odds ratio: 19.0; 95% CI: 2.8-160.4) as compared with normal or indeterminate metabolizers (p = 0.01). After adjusting the CYP2D6 activity score for drug-drug interactions, uncontrolled pain was reported more frequently in individuals with reduced CYP2D6 activity (odds ratio: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). Conclusion: Phenoconversion for drug-drug and drug-gene interactions is an important consideration in pharmacogenomic implementation; drug-drug interactions may obscure the potential benefits of genotyping.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The IGNITE Pharmacogenetics Working Group: An Opportunity for Building Evidence with Pharmacogenetic Implementation in a Real‐World Setting
    (Wiley, 2017-05) Cavallari, LH; Beitelshees, AL; Blake, KV; Dressler, LG; Duarte, JD; Elsey, A; Eichmeyer, JN; Empey, PE; Franciosi, JP; Hicks, JK; Holmes, AM; Jeng, LJB; Lee, CR; Lima, JJ; Limdi, NA; Modlin, J; Obeng, AO; Petry, N; Pratt, VM.; Skaar, Todd C.; Tuteja, S; Voora, D; Wagner, M; Weitzel, KW; Wilke, RA; Peterson, JF; Johnson, JA; Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The INGENIOUS Trial: Impact of pharmacogenetic testing on adverse events in a pragmatic clinical trial
    (Springer Nature, 2023) Eadon, Michael T.; Rosenman, Marc B.; Zhang, Pengyue; Fulton, Cathy R.; Callaghan, John T.; Holmes, Ann M.; Levy, Kenneth D.; Gupta, Samir K.; Haas, David M.; Vuppalanchi, Raj; Benson, Eric A.; Kreutz, Rolf P.; Tillman, Emma M.; Shugg, Tyler; Pierson, Rebecca C.; Gufford, Brandon T.; Pratt, Victoria M.; Zang, Yong; Desta, Zeruesenay; Dexter, Paul R.; Skaar, Todd C.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Adverse drug events (ADEs) account for a significant mortality, morbidity, and cost burden. Pharmacogenetic testing has the potential to reduce ADEs and inefficacy. The objective of this INGENIOUS trial (NCT02297126) analysis was to determine whether conducting and reporting pharmacogenetic panel testing impacts ADE frequency. The trial was a pragmatic, randomized controlled clinical trial, adapted as a propensity matched analysis in individuals (N = 2612) receiving a new prescription for one or more of 26 pharmacogenetic-actionable drugs across a community safety-net and academic health system. The intervention was a pharmacogenetic testing panel for 26 drugs with dosage and selection recommendations returned to the health record. The primary outcome was occurrence of ADEs within 1 year, according to modified Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). In the propensity-matched analysis, 16.1% of individuals experienced any ADE within 1-year. Serious ADEs (CTCAE level ≥ 3) occurred in 3.2% of individuals. When combining all 26 drugs, no significant difference was observed between the pharmacogenetic testing and control arms for any ADE (Odds ratio 0.96, 95% CI: 0.78-1.18), serious ADEs (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.58-1.40), or mortality (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.28-1.21). However, sub-group analyses revealed a reduction in serious ADEs and death in individuals who underwent pharmacogenotyping for aripiprazole and serotonin or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.12-0.85). In conclusion, no change in overall ADEs was observed after pharmacogenetic testing. However, limitations incurred during INGENIOUS likely affected the results. Future studies may consider preemptive, rather than reactive, pharmacogenetic panel testing.