Browsing by Subject "Heart diseases"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Acquired coronary-cameral fistula
    (Wiley, 2009-08) Jacob, Sony; Feigenbaum, Harvey; Medicine, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Concentration in Early Pregnancy With Development of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Future Hypertension
    (American Medical Association, 2022) Hauspurg, Alisse; Marsh, Derek J.; McNeil, Rebecca B.; Bairey Merz, C. Noel; Greenland, Philip; Straub, Adam C.; Rouse, Caroline E.; Grobman, William A.; Pemberton, Victoria L.; Silver, Robert M.; Chen, Yii-Der Ida; Mercer, Brian M.; Levine, Lisa D.; Hameed, Afshan; Hoffman, Matthew K.; Simhan, Hyagriv N.; Catov, Janet M.; NICHD nuMoM2b and NHLBI nuMoM2b Heart Health Study Networks; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Importance: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with future cardiovascular disease, perhaps because of subclinical cardiac dysfunction before pregnancy leading to impaired adaptation to pregnancy. Natriuretic peptides are promising biomarkers for detecting subclinical cardiac dysfunction outside of pregnancy. Objective: To investigate whether higher concentrations of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in early pregnancy would be associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and hypertension 2 to 7 years post partum. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used data from the The Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be Heart Health Study, a prospective multicenter observational study. A total of 4103 nulliparous women with complete data and no prepregnancy hypertension or diabetes who were treated at 8 clinical sites were included. Women were followed up with for 2 to 7 years after pregnancy. Data were collected from October 2010 to October 2017, and data were analyzed from August 2020 to November 2021. Exposures: NT-proBNP concentration, measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay from a first-trimester blood sample. Main outcomes and measures: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and incident hypertension (systolic blood pressure of 130 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of 80 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive agents) at follow-up visit. Results: A total of 4103 women met inclusion criteria; the mean (SD) age was 27.0 (5.6) years. Among these women, 909 (22.2%) had an adverse pregnancy outcome, and 817 (19.9%) had hypertension at the follow-up visit. Higher NT-proBNP concentrations were associated with a lower risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio per doubling, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91), which persisted after adjustment for age, self-reported race and ethnicity, early-pregnancy body mass index, smoking, and aspirin use. Similarly, higher NT-proBNP concentration in early pregnancy was also associated with a lower risk of incident hypertension 2 to 7 years after delivery (adjusted odds ratio per doubling, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.93), an association that persisted after controlling for confounders, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, higher NT-proBNP concentrations in early pregnancy were associated with a lower risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and hypertension 2 to 7 years post partum. These findings suggest that normal early-pregnancy cardiovascular physiology, as assessed by NT-proBNP concentration, may provide biologic insights into both pregnancy outcome and cardiovascular disease risk.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Mean Heart Dose Is an Inadequate Surrogate for Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Dose and the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy
    (Elsevier, 2021) Atkins, Katelyn M.; Bitterman, Danielle S.; Chaunzwa, Tafadzwa L.; Kozono, David E.; Baldini, Elizabeth H.; Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.; Tamarappoo, Balaji K.; Hoffmann, Udo; Nohria, Anju; Mak, Raymond H.; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    Purpose: Mean heart dose (MHD) over 10 Gy and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery volume (V) receiving 15 Gy (V15Gy) greater than 10% can significantly increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to characterize the discordance between MHD and LAD dose and the association of this classification on the risk of MACE after radiation therapy. Methods and materials: The coefficient of determination for MHD and LAD V15Gy was calculated in this retrospective analysis of 701 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with radiation therapy. Four groups were defined on the basis of high or low MHD (≥10 Gy vs <10 Gy) and LAD V15Gy (≥10% vs <10%). MACE (unstable angina, heart failure, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and cardiac death) cumulative incidence was estimated, and Fine and Gray regressions were performed. Results: The proportion of variance in LAD V15Gy predictable from MHD was only 54.5% (R2 = 0.545). There was discordance (where MHD was high [≥10 Gy] and LAD low [V15Gy < 10%], or vice versa) in 23.1% of patients (n = 162). Two-year MACE estimates were 4.2% (MHDhigh/LADlow), 7.6% (MHDhigh/LADhigh), 1.8% (MHDlow/LADlow), and 13.0% (MHDlow/LADhigh). Adjusting for pre-existing coronary heart disease and other prognostic factors, MHDhigh/LADlow (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.93; P = .036) and MHDlow/LADlow (SHR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.53; P < .001) were associated with a significantly reduced risk of MACE. Conclusions: MHD is insufficient to predict LAD V15Gy with confidence. When MHD and LAD V15Gy dose exposure is discordant, isolated low LAD V15Gy significantly reduces the risk of MACE in patients with locally advanced NSCLC after radiation therapy, suggesting that the validity of whole heart metrics for optimally predicting cardiac events should be reassessed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Public Attitudes Regarding Hospitals and Physicians Encouraging Donations From Grateful Patients
    (American Medical Association, 2020) Jagsi, Reshma; Griffith, Kent A.; Carrese, Joseph A.; Collins, Megan; Kao, Audiey C.; Konrath, Sara; Tovino, Stacey A.; Wheeler, Jane L.; Wright, Scott M.; Lilly Family School of Philanthropy
    Importance: Philanthropy is an increasingly important source of support for health care institutions. There is little empirical evidence to inform ethical guidelines. Objective: To assess public attitudes regarding specific practices used by health care institutions to encourage philanthropic donations from grateful patients. Design, setting, and participants: Using the Ipsos KnowledgePanel, a probability-based sample representative of the US population, a survey solicited opinions from a primary cohort representing the general population and 3 supplemental cohorts (with high income, cancer, and with heart disease, respectively). Exposures: Web-based questionnaire. Main outcomes and measures: Descriptive analyses (with percentages weighted to make the sample demographically representative of the US population) evaluated respondents' attitudes regarding the acceptability of strategies hospitals may use to identify, solicit, and thank donors; perceptions of the effect of physicians discussing donations with their patients; and opinions regarding gift use and stewardship. Results: Of 831 individuals targeted for the general population sample, 513 (62%) completed surveys, of whom 246 (48.0%) were women and 345 (67.3%) non-Hispanic white. In the weighted sample, 47.0% (95% CI, 42.3%-51.7%) responded that physicians giving patient names to hospital fundraising staff after asking patients' permission was definitely or probably acceptable; 8.5% (95% CI, 5.7%-11.2%) endorsed referring without asking permission. Of the participants, 79.5% (95% CI, 75.6%-83.4%) reported it acceptable for physicians to talk to patients about donating if patients have brought it up; 14.2% (95% CI, 10.9%-17.6%) reported it acceptable when patients have not brought it up; 9.9% (95% CI, 7.1%-12.8%) accepted hospital development staff performing wealth screening using publicly available data to identify patients capable of large donations. Of the participants, 83.2% (95% CI, 79.5%-86.9%) agreed that physicians talking with their patients about donating may interfere with the patient-physician relationship. For a hypothetical patient who donated $1 million, 50.1% (95% CI, 45.4%-54.7%) indicated it would be acceptable for the hospital to show thanks by providing nicer hospital rooms, 26.0% (95% CI, 21.9%-30.1%) by providing expedited appointments, and 19.8% (95% CI, 16.1%-23.5%) by providing physicians' cell phone numbers. Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study of participants drawn from the general US population, a substantial proportion did not endorse legally allowable approaches for identifying, engaging, and thanking patient-donors.