- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Emergency medical services (EMS)"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Pain, Return to Community Status, and 90-Day Mortality Among Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure(Wolters Kluwer, 2024-07-10) Smith, Asa; Jung, Miyeon; O'Donnell, Daniel; White, Fletcher; Pressler, SusanBackground: Pain is common among patients with heart failure but has not been examined with short-term discharge outcomes. The purpose was to examine whether pain at discharge predicts return to community status and 90-day mortality among hospitalized patients with heart failure. Methods: Data from medical records of 2169 patients hospitalized with heart failure were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. The independent variable was a diagnosis of pain at discharge. Outcomes were return to community status (yes/no) and 90-day mortality. Logistic regression was used to address aims. Covariates included age, gender, race, vital signs, comorbid symptoms, comorbid conditions, cardiac devices, and length of stay. Results: The sample had a mean age of 66.53 years, and was 57.4% AQ3 women and 55.9%Black. Of 2169 patients, 1601 (73.8%) returned to community, and 117 (5.4%) died at or before 90 days. Patients with pain returned to community less frequently (69.6%) compared with patients without pain (75. 2%), which was a statistically significant relationship (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.57–0.97; P = .028). Other variables that predicted return to community status included age, comorbid conditions, dyspnea, fatigue, systolic blood pressure, and length of stay. Pain did not predict increased 90-day mortality. Variables that predicted mortality included age, liver disease, and systolic blood pressure. Conclusion: Patients with pain were less likely to return to community but did not have higher 90-day mortality. Pain in combination with other symptoms and comorbid conditions may play a role in mortality if acute pain versus chronic pain can be stratified in a future study.Item Prevalence and correlates of incarceration following emergency medical services response to overdose(Elsevier, 2022) Ray, Bradley; Hedden, Bethany J.; Carroll, Jennifer J.; del Pozo, Brandon; Wagner, Karla; Kral, Alex H.; O’Donnell, Daniel; Victor, Grant; Huynh, Phil; Emergency Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: To describe the prevalence of incarceration among survivors of non-fatal overdose addressed through an emergency medical services (EMS) response, and compare incarceration by whether the emergency was for opioid-involved or stimulant-involved overdose. Methods: Administrative records on 192,113 EMS incidents and 70,409 jail booking events occurring between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020 in Indianapolis, Indiana were record-linked at the event level. Incarceration taking place within 6-hours of an EMS incident was associated with that incident. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of incarceration after an overdose. Results: Among all EMS incidents, 2.6% were followed by incarceration. For overdose EMS incidents, the prevalence of incarceration was 10.0%. Overdose incidents had higher odds than non-overdose incidents of leading to a charge of felony, booked on a warrant, and transferred to another law enforcement agency upon release. Prevalence of incarceration following a stimulant-involved overdose was 21.3%, compared to 9.3% for opioid-involved overdose survivors. Compared to persons from other EMS incidents, overdose survivors had greater odds of incarceration (AOR=3.48, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 3.22, 3.75, p < .001), with opioid-involved overdoses (AOR=3.03, 95% CI=2.76, 3.33, p < .001) and stimulant-involved overdoses (AOR=6.70, 95% CI=5.26, 8.55, p < .001) leading to higher odds of incarceration. Conclusion: Incarceration in county jail followed one in ten overdose-involved EMS responses. As illicit drug consumption increasingly involves stimulants, the frequency of incarceration following these events is likely to increase. Policy changes and interventions are needed to reduce incarceration after overdose emergencies.Item Quantifying the amount of greater brain ischemia protection time with pre-hospital vs. in-hospital neuroprotective agent start(Frontiers Media, 2022) Matossian, Vartan; Starkman, Sidney; Sanossian, Nerses; Stratton, Samuel; Eckstein, Marc; Conwit, Robin; Liebeskind, David S.; Sharma, Latisha; Tenser, May-Kim; Saver, Jeffrey L.; Neurology, School of MedicineThe objective of this study is to quantify the increase in brain-under-protection time that may be achieved with pre-hospital compared with the post-arrival start of neuroprotective therapy among patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. In order to do this, a comparative analysis was performed of two randomized trials of neuroprotective agents: (1) pre-hospital strategy: Field administration of stroke therapy-magnesium (FAST-MAG) Trial; (2) in-hospital strategy: Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) Trial. In the FAST-MAG trial, among 1,041 acute ischemic stroke patients, 44 were treated with endovascular reperfusion therapy (ERT), including 32 treated with both intravenous thrombolysis and ERT and 12 treated with ERT alone. In the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, among 1,105 acute ischemic stroke patients, 659 were treated with both intravenous thrombolysis and ERT, and 446 were treated with ERT alone. The start of the neuroprotective agent was sooner after onset with pre-hospital vs. in-hospital start: 45 m (IQR 38-56) vs. 122 m. The neuroprotective agent in FAST-MAG was started 8 min prior to ED arrival compared with 64 min after arrival in ESCAPE-NA1. Projecting modern endovascular workflows to FAST-MAG, the total time of "brain under protection" (neuroprotective agent start to reperfusion) was greater with pre-hospital than in-hospital start: 94 m (IQR 90-98) vs. 22 m. Initiating a neuroprotective agent in the pre-hospital setting enables a faster treatment start, yielding 72 min additional brain protection time for patients with acute ischemic stroke. These findings provide support for the increased performance of ambulance-based, pre-hospital treatment trials in the development of neuroprotective stroke therapies.