- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "DNA Repair"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Acetylation regulates DNA repair mechanisms in human cells(Informa UK (Taylor & Francis), 2016-06-02) Piekna-Przybylska, Dorota; Bambara, Robert A.; Balakrishnan, Lata; Department of Biology, School of ScienceThe p300-mediated acetylation of enzymes involved in DNA repair and replication has been previously shown to stimulate or inhibit their activities in reconstituted systems. To explore the role of acetylation on DNA repair in cells we constructed plasmid substrates carrying inactivating damages in the EGFP reporter gene, which should be repaired in cells through DNA mismatch repair (MMR) or base excision repair (BER) mechanisms. We analyzed efficiency of repair within these plasmid substrates in cells exposed to deacetylase and acetyltransferase inhibitors, and also in cells deficient in p300 acetyltransferase. Our results indicate that protein acetylation improves DNA mismatch repair in MMR-proficient HeLa cells and also in MMR-deficient HCT116 cells. Moreover, results suggest that stimulated repair of mismatches in MMR-deficient HCT116 cells is done though a strand-displacement synthesis mechanism described previously for Okazaki fragments maturation and also for the EXOI-independent pathway of MMR. Loss of p300 reduced repair of mismatches in MMR-deficient cells, but did not have evident effects on BER mechanisms, including the long patch BER pathway. Hypoacetylation of the cells in the presence of acetyltransferase inhibitor, garcinol generally reduced efficiency of BER of 8-oxoG damage, indicating that some steps in the pathway are stimulated by acetylation.Item Clarifying the Role of the CST Complex in DNA Replication and Repair(2021-12) Wysong, Brandon Carter; Balakrishnan, Lata; Marrs, James A.; Perrin, Benjamin J.Ends of linear chromosomes are maintained by specialized structures known as telomeres. These structures are protected by a number of essential protein complexes including the shelterin complex and CST (CTC1 – STN1 – TEN1) complex. CST is an RPA-like ssDNA binding protein that is vital for telomere length maintenance via inhibition of telomerase and stimulation of DNA polymerase α -primase during C-strand fill-in synthesis. CST is also known to possess additional genome-wide roles in regulating DNA replication and repair including helping facilitate replication re-start at stalled forks, activating checkpoint signaling at double-strand breaks, and promoting replication origin firing. Proper and efficient repair of DNA is critical in order to protect the integrity of the genome and prevent extreme mutagenesis. Telomeres have a strong predisposition to oxidative DNA damage in the form of 8-oxoguanine caused by exposure to reactive oxygen species and free radicals. These oxidative lesions are repaired by the base-excision repair (BER) pathway. Previous work has implicated telomeric proteins such as the shelterin complex in mediating BER. Here we show for the first time that the CST complex and individual subunits robustly stimulate a myriad of proteins involved in the BER pathway including Pol β, APE1, FEN1, and LIGI. CST’s ability to augment these BER-associated proteins could be instrumental in promoting efficient DNA repair. Additionally, we find that CTC1 and STN1 are able to significantly enhance the polymerase activity of Pol δ and Pol α on both random-sequence and telomeric-sequence DNA substrates in vitro. What is more, we establish the ability of CST to resolve G4 structure and promote Pol δ synthesis, which we predict is a key feature of CST’s involvement in DNA replication at telomeres, which are known to form replication-inhibiting G4’s. Our results define important mechanistic insight into CST’s role in DNA replication and repair, and provide a strong foundation for future studies relating defective telomere maintenance to aging disorders and cancers which impact human health.Item DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Genes and Oxidative Damage in Brain Metastasis of Breast Cancer(Oxford University Press) Woditschka, Stephan; Evans, Lynda; Duchnowska, Renata; Reed, L. Tiffany; Palmieri, Diane; Qian, Yongzhen; Badve, Sunil; Sledge, George; Gril, Brunilde; Aladjem, Mirit I.; Fu, Haiqing; Flores, Natasha M.; Gökmen-Polar, Yesim; Biernat, Wojciech; Szutowicz-Zielińska, Ewa; Mandat, Tomasz; Trojanowski, Tomasz; Och, Waldemar; Czartoryska-Arlukowicz, Bogumiła; Jassem, Jacek; Mitchell, James B.; Steeg, Patricia S.; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicineBackground Breast cancer frequently metastasizes to the brain, colonizing a neuro-inflammatory microenvironment. The molecular pathways facilitating this colonization remain poorly understood. Methods Expression profiling of 23 matched sets of human resected brain metastases and primary breast tumors by two-sided paired t test was performed to identify brain metastasis–specific genes. The implicated DNA repair genes BARD1 and RAD51 were modulated in human (MDA-MB-231-BR) and murine (4T1-BR) brain-tropic breast cancer cell lines by lentiviral transduction of cDNA or short hairpin RNA (shRNA) coding sequences. Their functional contribution to brain metastasis development was evaluated in mouse xenograft models (n = 10 mice per group). Results Human brain metastases overexpressed BARD1 and RAD51 compared with either matched primary tumors (1.74-fold, P < .001; 1.46-fold, P < .001, respectively) or unlinked systemic metastases (1.49-fold, P = .01; 1.44-fold, P = .008, respectively). Overexpression of either gene in MDA-MB-231-BR cells increased brain metastases by threefold to fourfold after intracardiac injections, but not lung metastases upon tail-vein injections. In 4T1-BR cells, shRNA-mediated RAD51 knockdown reduced brain metastases by 2.5-fold without affecting lung metastasis development. In vitro, BARD1- and RAD51-overexpressing cells showed reduced genomic instability but only exhibited growth and colonization phenotypes upon DNA damage induction. Reactive oxygen species were present in tumor cells and elevated in the metastatic neuro-inflammatory microenvironment and could provide an endogenous source of genotoxic stress. Tempol, a brain-permeable oxygen radical scavenger suppressed brain metastasis promotion induced by BARD1 and RAD51 overexpression. Conclusions BARD1 and RAD51 are frequently overexpressed in brain metastases from breast cancer and may constitute a mechanism to overcome reactive oxygen species–mediated genotoxic stress in the metastatic brain.Item DNA repair targeted therapy: The past or future of cancer treatment?(Elsevier, 2016-04) Gavande, Navnath S.; VanderVere-Carozza, Pamela S.; Hinshaw, Hilary D.; Jalal, Shadia I.; Sears, Catherine R.; Pawelczak, Katherine S.; Turchi, John J.; Department of Medicine, School of MedicineThe repair of DNA damage is a complex process that relies on particular pathways to remedy specific types of damage to DNA. The range of insults to DNA includes small, modest changes in structure including mismatched bases and simple methylation events to oxidized bases, intra- and interstrand DNA crosslinks, DNA double strand breaks and protein-DNA adducts. Pathways required for the repair of these lesions include mismatch repair, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, and the homology directed repair/Fanconi anemia pathway. Each of these pathways contributes to genetic stability, and mutations in genes encoding proteins involved in these pathways have been demonstrated to promote genetic instability and cancer. In fact, it has been suggested that all cancers display defects in DNA repair. It has also been demonstrated that the ability of cancer cells to repair therapeutically induced DNA damage impacts therapeutic efficacy. This has led to targeting DNA repair pathways and proteins to develop anti-cancer agents that will increase sensitivity to traditional chemotherapeutics. While initial studies languished and were plagued by a lack of specificity and a defined mechanism of action, more recent approaches to exploit synthetic lethal interaction and develop high affinity chemical inhibitors have proven considerably more effective. In this review we will highlight recent advances and discuss previous failures in targeting DNA repair to pave the way for future DNA repair targeted agents and their use in cancer therapy.Item Identification of new chemical entities targeting APE1 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)(ASPET, 2016-01-01) Kelley, Mark R.; Wikel, James H.; Guo, Chunlu; Pollok, Karen E.; Bailey, Barbara J.; Wireman, Randy; Fishel, Melissa L.; Vasko, Michael R.; Department of Pediatrics, School of MedicineChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a potentially debilitating side effect of a number of chemotherapeutic agents that does not have any FDA-approved interventions or prevention strategies. Although the cellular mechanisms mediating CIPN remain to be determined, several lines of evidence support the notion that DNA damage may be a causative factor in neuropathy induced by a number of cancer therapies. Therapies including platinum agents and ionizing radiation cause DNA damage in sensory neurons and augmenting key steps in the base excision repair (BER) pathway reverses this damage. Neuronal protection is provided by overexpressing APE1 as well as using a first generation targeted APE1 small molecule E3330 (also called APX3330). Accordingly, we determined whether novel second-generation APE1 targeted molecules would be protective against neurotoxicity-induced by cisplatin or oxaliplatin while not diminishing the anti-tumor effect of the platins. We determined using our ex vivo model of sensory neurons in culture measuring various endpoints of neurotoxicity that APX2009 is an effective small molecule that is neuroprotective against cisplatin and oxaliplatin-induced toxicity of sensory neurons. APX2009 also demonstrated a strong tumor cell killing effect in tumor cells. Additionally, the enhanced tumor cell killing was further shown in a more robust 3D pancreatic tumor model. Together, these data suggest that APX2009 is effective in preventing or reversing platinum-induced CIPN, while not affecting the anti-cancer activity of platins.Item Inhibition of Ape1's DNA Repair Activity as a Target in Cancer: Identification of Novel Small Molecules that have Translational Potential for Molecularly Targeted Cancer Therapy(2009-12) Bapat, Aditi Ajit; Kelley, Mark Richard, 1957-; Georgiadis, Millie M.; Turchi, John J.; Smith, Martin L.The DNA Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway repairs DNA damaged by endogenous and exogenous agents including chemotherapeutic agents. Removal of the damaged base by a DNA glycosylase creates an apurinic / apyrimidinic (AP) site. AP endonuclease1 (Ape1), a critical component in this pathway, hydrolyzes the phosphodiester backbone 5’ to the AP site to facilitate repair. Additionally, Ape1 also functions as a redox factor, known as Ref-1, to reduce and activate key transcription factors such as AP-1 (Fos/Jun), p53, HIF-1α and others. Elevated Ape1 levels in cancers are indicators of poor prognosis and chemotherapeutic resistance, and removal of Ape1 via methodology such as siRNA sensitizes cancer cell lines to chemotherapeutic agents. However, since Ape1 is a multifunctional protein, removing it from cells not only inhibits its DNA repair activity but also impairs its other functions. Our hypothesis is that a small molecule inhibitor of the DNA repair activity of Ape1 will help elucidate the importance (role) of its repair function in cancer progression as wells as tumor drug response and will also give us a pharmacological tool to enhance cancer cells’ sensitivity to chemotherapy. In order to discover an inhibitor of Ape1’s DNA repair function, a fluorescence-based high-throughput screening (HTS) assay was used to screen a library of drug-like compounds. Four distinct compounds (AR01, 02, 03 and 06) that inhibited Ape1’s DNA repair activity were identified. All four compounds inhibited the DNA repair activity of purified Ape1 protein and also inhibited Ape1’s activity in cellular extracts. Based on these and other in vitro studies, AR03 was utilized in cell culture-based assays to test our hypothesis that inhibition of the DNA repair activity of Ape1 would sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapeutic agents. The SF767 glioblastoma cell line was used in our assays as the chemotherapeutic agents used to treat gliobastomas induce lesions repaired by the BER pathway. AR03 is cytotoxic to SF767 glioblastoma cancer cells as a single agent and enhances the cytotoxicity of alkylating agents, which is consistent with Ape1’s inability to process the AP sites generated. I have identified a compound, which inhibits Ape1’s DNA repair activity and may have the potential in improving chemotherapeutic efficacy of selected chemotherapeutic agents as well as to help us understand better the role of Ape1’s repair function as opposed to its other functions in the cell.Item Targeting DNA repair pathways for cancer treatment: what's new?(Future Medicine, 2014-05) Kelley, Mark R.; Logsdon, Derek; Fishel, Melissa L.; Department of Pediatrics, IU School of MedicineDisruptions in DNA repair pathways predispose cells to accumulating DNA damage. A growing body of evidence indicates that tumors accumulate progressively more mutations in DNA repair proteins as cancers progress. DNA repair mechanisms greatly affect the response to cytotoxic treatments, so understanding those mechanisms and finding ways to turn dysregulated repair processes against themselves to induce tumor death is the goal of all DNA repair inhibition efforts. Inhibition may be direct or indirect. This burgeoning field of research is replete with promise and challenge, as more intricacies of each repair pathway are discovered. In an era of increasing concern about healthcare costs, use of DNA repair inhibitors can prove to be highly effective stewardship of R&D resources and patient expenses.