Browsing by Subject "Brain metastases"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Burden and Risk Factors of Brain Metastases in Melanoma: A Systematic Literature Review(MDPI, 2022-12-12) Tan, Xiang-Lin; Le, Amy; Tang, Huilin; Brown, Madeline; Scherrer, Emilie; Han, Jiali; Jiang, Ruixuan; Diede, Scott J.; Shui, Irene M.; Epidemiology, School of Public HealthMelanoma can frequently metastasize to the brain with severe consequences. However, variation of melanoma brain metastases (MBM) development among populations is not well studied, and underlying mechanisms and risk factors for MBM development are not consistently documented. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) including a total of 39 articles to evaluate the proportion of melanoma patients who are diagnosed with, or develop, brain metastases, and summarize the risk factors of MBM. The average proportion of MBM was calculated and weighted by the sample size of each study. Meta-analyses were conducted for the selected risk factors using a random-effects model. The proportion of MBM at diagnosis was 33% (975 with MBM out of 2948 patients) among patients with cutaneous melanoma (excluding acral) and 23% (651/2875) among patients with cutaneous mixed with other types of melanoma. The proportion at diagnosis was lower among populations with mucosal (9/96, 9%) or uveal (4/184, 2%) melanoma and among populations outside the United States and Europe. Meta-analysis demonstrated that male vs. female gender and left-sided tumors vs. right-sided were significantly associated with increased risk of melanoma brain metastases. These data may help clinicians to assess an individual patient's risk of developing melanoma brain metastases.Item Discovery of increased number or interval growth of brain metastases on same-day GammaKnife™ planning MRI: Predicting factors and patient outcomes(Old City Publishing, 2022) Mereniuk, Todd R.; Burney, Heather N.; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Watson, Gordon A.; Rhome, Ryan M.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicinePurpose: To determine factors associated with increased risk of finding new and/or enlarged brain metastases (BM) on GammaKnife™ (GK) MRI and their impact on patient outcomes. Results: 43.9% of patients showed BM growth, 32.9% had additional brain metastases (aBM), and 18.1 % had both. Initial brain metastasis velocity (iBMV) was associated with finding aBM. Time between diagnostic MRI (dMRI) and GK MRI was associated with interval growth and each day increased this risk by 2%. Prior brain metastasectomy and greater time between either dMRI or latest extracranial RT and GK MRI predicted both aBM and BM growth. aBM and/or BM growth led to management change in 1.8% of cases and were not associated with OS or incidence of distant intracranial failure. Conclusions: Number of metastases seen on dMRI and iBMV predicted both aBM and/or BM growth, however, these factors did not significantly affect survival or incidence of distant intracranial failure.Item Efficacy of pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery followed by surgical resection and correlative radiobiological analysis for patients with 1-4 brain metastases: study protocol for a phase II trial(Biomed Central, 2018-12-20) Huff, Wei X.; Agrawal, Namita; Shapiro, Scott; Miller, James; Kulwin, Charles; Shah, Mitesh; Savage, Jesse J.; Payner, Troy; Vortmeyer, Alexander; Watson, Gordon; Dey, Mahua; Neurological Surgery, School of MedicineBACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a common adjuvant modality used with surgery for resectable brain metastases (BMs). However, the optimal sequence of the multi-modality therapy has not been established. The goal of the study is to evaluate 6-month local control utilizing pre-operative SRS followed by surgical resection for patients with 1-4 brain metastases. METHODS: This prospective, single arm, phase II trial will recruit patients with up to 4 brain metastases and at least one resectable lesion. All lesions will be treated with SRS and symptomatic lesions will be resected within 1-4 days after SRS. Patients will be monitored for 6-month local control, in-brain progression free survival, distant in-brain failure, rate of leptomeningeal spread, radiation necrosis and overall survival. Additionally, we will also perform correlative radiobiological molecular studies to assess the effect of radiation dosing on the tumor tissue and clinical outcomes. We expect that pre-operative SRS to the gross tumor prior to surgical resection will improve local control and decrease leptomeningeal failure. DISCUSSION: Our study is the second prospective trial to investigate the efficacy of pre-operative SRS in the treatment of multiple BMs. In addition, the correlative molecular studies will be the first to investigate early response of BMs at a cellular and genetic level in response to radiation doses and potentially provide molecular prognostic markers for local control and overall survival.Item Genomic signature for oligometastatic disease in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases(Frontiers Media, 2024-09-17) Choi, Ariel R.; D’Agostino, Ralph B., Jr.; Farris, Michael K.; Abdulhaleem, Mohammed; Hunting, John C.; Wang, Yuezhu; Smith, Margaret R.; Ruiz, Jimmy; Lycan, Thomas W.; Petty, W. Jeffrey; Cramer, Christina K.; Tatter, Stephen B.; Laxton, Adrian W.; White, Jaclyn J.; Li, Wencheng; Su, Jing; Whitlow, Christopher; Xing, Fei; Chan, Michael D.; Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public HealthPurpose/objectives: Biomarkers for extracranial oligometastatic disease remain elusive and few studies have attempted to correlate genomic data to the presence of true oligometastatic disease. Methods: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases were identified in our departmental database. Electronic medical records were used to identify patients for whom liquid biopsy-based comprehensive genomic profiling (Guardant Health) was available. Extracranial oligometastatic disease was defined as patients having ≤5 non-brain metastases without diffuse involvement of a single organ. Widespread disease was any spread beyond oligometastatic. Fisher's exact tests were used to screen for mutations statistically associated (p<0.1) with either oligometastatic or widespread extracranial disease. A risk score for the likelihood of oligometastatic disease was generated and correlated to the likelihood of having oligometastatic disease vs widespread disease. For oligometastatic patients, a competing risk analysis was done to assess for cumulative incidence of oligometastatic progression. Cox regression was used to determine association between oligometastatic risk score and oligoprogression. Results: 130 patients met study criteria and were included in the analysis. 51 patients (39%) had extracranial oligometastatic disease. Genetic mutations included in the Guardant panel that were associated (p<0.1) with the presence of oligometastatic disease included ATM, JAK2, MAP2K2, and NTRK1, while ARID1A and CCNE1 were associated with widespread disease. Patients with a positive, neutral and negative risk score for oligometastatic disease had a 78%, 41% and 11.5% likelihood of having oligometastatic disease, respectively (p<0.0001). Overall survival for patients with positive, neutral and negative risk scores for oligometastatic disease was 86% vs 82% vs 64% at 6 months (p=0.2). Oligometastatic risk score was significantly associated with the likelihood of oligoprogression based on the Wald chi-square test. Patients with positive, neutral and negative risk scores for oligometastatic disease had a cumulative incidence of oligometastatic progression of 77% vs 35% vs 33% at 6 months (p=0.03). Conclusions: Elucidation of a genomic signature for extracranial oligometastatic disease derived from non-invasive liquid biopsy appears feasible for NSCLC patients. Patients with this signature exhibited higher rates of early oligoprogression. External validation could lead to a biomarker that has the potential to direct local therapies in oligometastatic patients.Item Impact of hospital volume on mortality for brain metastases treated with radiation(Elsevier, 2021-08-12) McClelland, Shearwood, III.; Degnin, Catherine; Chen, Yiyi; Jaboin, Jerry J.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineBackground: The impact of hospital volume on cancer patient survival has been demonstrated in the surgical literature, but sparsely for patients receiving radiation therapy (RT). This analysis addresses the impact of hospital volume on patients receiving RT for the most common central nervous system tumor: brain metastases. Materials and methods: Analysis was conducted using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010-2015 for patients with metastatic brain disease from lung cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer requiring RT. Hospital volume was stratified as high-volume (≥ 12 brain RT/year), moderate (5-11 RT/year), and low (< 5 RT/year). The effect of hospital volume on overall survival was assessed using a multivariable Cox regression model. Results: A total of 18,841 patients [9479 (50.3%) men, 9362 (49.7%) women; median age 64 years] met the inclusion criteria. 16.7% were treated at high-volume hospitals, 36.5% at moderate-volume, and the remaining 46.8% at low-volume centers. Multivariable analysis revealed that mortality was significantly improved in high-volume centers (HR: 0.95, p = 0.039) compared with low-volume centers after accounting for multiple demographics including age, sex, race, insurance status, income, facility type, Charlson-Deyo score and receipt of palliative care. Conclusion: Hospitals performing 12 or more brain RT procedures per year have significantly improved survival in brain metastases patients receiving radiation as compared to lower volume hospitals. This finding, independent of additional demographics, indicates that the increased experience associated with increased volume may improve survival in this patient population.Item Metastases in the Pineal Region: A Systematic Review of Clinical Features, Management Strategies, and Survival Outcomes(Elsevier, 2022) Palmisciano, Paolo; Ogasawara, Christian; Nwagwu, Chibueze D.; Bin Alamer, Othman; Gupta, Aditya D.; Giantini-Larsen, Alexandra M.; Scalia, Gianluca; Yu, Kenny; Umana, Giuseppe E.; Cohen-Gadol, Aaron A.; El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y.; Haider, Ali S.; Neurological Surgery, School of MedicineBackground: Pineal region metastases are rare but often cause severe neurologic deficits. Surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy can provide therapeutic benefit. We investigated the literature to analyze clinical characteristics, management strategies, and survival of adult patients with pineal region metastases. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA guidelines, including studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients with pineal region metastases. Clinical presentation, management, and survival were reviewed. Results: We included 31 studies comprising 47 patients. Lung cancer (29.8%) and carcinomas of unknown origin (14.9%) were the most frequent primary tumors. In 48.9% of patients, symptomatic pineal metastases preceded primary tumor diagnosis. Headache (67.4%) and confusion (46.5%) were the most common symptoms. Parinaud syndrome (46.5%) and hydrocephalus (87.2%) were noted. Biopsy (65.9%) was preferred over resection (34.1%), and shunting strategies used were endoscopic third ventriculostomy (43.9%) and ventriculoperitoneal (26.8%). Eleven patients (32.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 32 (68%) received radiotherapy. Posttreatment improvement in symptoms (56.6%) and hydrocephalus (80.5%) were noted. In patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy, significant improvement in posttreatment performance status occurred with both biopsy (P < 0.001) and resection (P = 0.007). No survival differences were reported between surgery and biopsy (P = 0.912) or between complete and partial resection (P = 0.220). Overall survival was neither influenced by surgical approach (P = 0.157) nor by shunting strategy (P = 0.822). Mean follow-up was 8 months and median overall survival 3 months. Only 2 cases (4.8%) of pineal metastasis showed recurrence. Conclusions: Pineal region metastases carry significant morbidity. Biopsy or surgical resection, combined with adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy and/or shunting, may significantly improve performance status.Item Multi-Omics Analysis of Brain Metastasis Outcomes Following Craniotomy(Frontiers Media, 2021-04-06) Su, Jing; Song, Qianqian; Qasem, Shadi; O’Neill, Stacey; Lee, Jingyun; Furdui, Cristina M.; Pasche, Boris; Metheny-Barlow, Linda; Masters, Adrianna H.; Lo, Hui-Wen; Xing, Fei; Watabe, Kounosuke; Miller, Lance D.; Tatter, Stephen B.; Laxton, Adrian W.; Whitlow, Christopher T.; Chan, Michael D.; Soike, Michael H.; Ruiz, Jimmy; Biostatistics, School of Public HealthBackground: The incidence of brain metastasis continues to increase as therapeutic strategies have improved for a number of solid tumors. The presence of brain metastasis is associated with worse prognosis but it is unclear if distinctive biomarkers can separate patients at risk for CNS related death. Methods: We executed a single institution retrospective collection of brain metastasis from patients who were diagnosed with lung, breast, and other primary tumors. The brain metastatic samples were sent for RNA sequencing, proteomic and metabolomic analysis of brain metastasis. The primary outcome was distant brain failure after definitive therapies that included craniotomy resection and radiation to surgical bed. Novel prognostic subtypes were discovered using transcriptomic data and sparse non-negative matrix factorization. Results: We discovered two molecular subtypes showing statistically significant differential prognosis irrespective of tumor subtype. The median survival time of the good and the poor prognostic subtypes were 7.89 and 42.27 months, respectively. Further integrated characterization and analysis of these two distinctive prognostic subtypes using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic molecular profiles of patients identified key pathways and metabolites. The analysis suggested that immune microenvironment landscape as well as proliferation and migration signaling pathways may be responsible to the observed survival difference. Conclusion: A multi-omics approach to characterization of brain metastasis provides an opportunity to identify clinically impactful biomarkers and associated prognostic subtypes and generate provocative integrative understanding of disease.Item Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature and Ongoing Clinical Trials(MDPI, 2022-09-04) Palmisciano, Paolo; Ferini, Gianluca; Khan, Ramlah; Bin-Alamer, Othman; Umana, Giuseppe E.; Yu, Kenny; Cohen-Gadol, Aaron A.; El Ahmadieh, Tarek Y.; Haider, Ali S.; Neurological Surgery, School of MedicineBackground: Brain metastases (BMs) carry a high morbidity and mortality burden. Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (NaSRT) has shown promising results. We systematically reviewed the literature on NaSRT for BMs. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web-of-Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies and ongoing trials reporting NaSRT for BMs. Indications, protocols, and outcomes were analyzed using indirect random-effect meta-analyses. Results: We included 7 studies comprising 460 patients with 483 BMs, and 13 ongoing trials. Most BMs originated from non-small lung cell carcinoma (41.4%), breast cancer (18.7%) and melanoma (43.6%). Most patients had single-BM (69.8%) located supratentorial (77.8%). Patients were eligible if they had histologically-proven primary tumors and ≤4 synchronous BMs candidate for non-urgent surgery and radiation. Patients with primary tumors clinically responsive to radiotherapy, prior brain radiation, and leptomeningeal metastases were deemed non-eligible. Median planning target volume was 9.9 cm3 (range, 2.9-57.1), and NaSRT was delivered in 1-fraction (90.9%), 5-fraction (4.8%), or 3-fraction (4.3%), with a median biological effective dose of 39.6 Gy10 (range, 35.7-60). Most patients received piecemeal (76.3%) and gross-total (94%) resection after a median of 1-day (range, 1-10) post-NaSRT. Median follow-up was 19.2-months (range, 1-41.3). Actuarial post-treatment rates were 4% (95%CI: 2-6%) for symptomatic radiation necrosis, 15% (95%CI: 12-18%) and 47% (95%CI: 42-52%) for local and distant recurrences, 6% (95%CI: 3-8%) for leptomeningeal metastases, 81% (95%CI: 75-87%) and 59% (95%CI: 54-63%) for 1-year local tumor control and overall survival. Conclusion: NaSRT is effective and safe for BMs. Ongoing trials will provide high-level evidence on long-term post-treatment outcomes, further compared to adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy.Item Radiosurgery dose reduction for brain metastases on immunotherapy (RADREMI): A prospective phase I study protocol(Elsevier, 2020) McClelland, Shearwood, III.; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Zang, Yong; Hanna, Nasser H.; Shiue, Kevin; Kamer, Aaron P.; Agrawal, Namita; Ellsworth, Susannah G.; Rhome, Ryan M.; Watson, Gordon A.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineIntroduction: Up to 20% of patients with brain metastases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and concomitant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) suffer from symptomatic radiation necrosis. The goal of this study is to evaluate Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Brain Metastases on Immunotherapy (RADREMI) on six-month symptomatic radiation necrosis rates. Methods: This study is a prospective single arm Phase I pilot study which will recruit patients with brain metastases receiving ICI delivered within 30 days before SRS. All patients will be treated with RADREMI dosing, which involves SRS doses of 18 Gy for 0-2 cm lesions, 14 Gy for 2.1-3 cm lesions, and 12 Gy for 3.1-4 cm lesions. All patients will be monitored for six-month symptomatic radiation necrosis (defined as a six-month rate of clinical symptomatology requiring steroid administration and/or operative intervention concomitant with imaging findings consistent with radiation necrosis) and six-month local control. We expect that RADREMI dosing will significantly reduce the symptomatic radiation necrosis rate of concomitant SRS + ICI without significantly sacrificing the local control obtained by the present RTOG 90-05 SRS dosing schema. Local control will be defined according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Discussion: This study is the first prospective trial to investigate the safety of dose-reduced SRS in treatment of brain metastases with concomitant ICI. The findings should provide fertile soil for future multi-institutional collaborative efficacy trials of RADREMI dosing for this patient population.Item Reduced radiation necrosis in radiosurgical treatment of small brain metastases with 22 Gy(Old City Publishing, 2021) McClelland, Shearwood, III.; Mereniuk, Todd R.; Elbanna, May F.; Huang, Christina C.; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Miller, James C.; Watson, Gordon A.; Rhome, Ryan M.; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine