Browsing by Author "Yaqub, Muhammad S."

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Bamlanivimab for Mild to Moderate COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    (Elsevier, 2021-09) Jan, Muhammad Y.; Sayegh, Skye E.; Webb, Hanna T.; Adebiyi, Oluwafisayo; Anderson, Melissa D.; Mishler, Dennis P.; Yaqub, Muhammad S.; Taber, Tim; Sharfuddin, Asif A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an increased risk of hospitalization, complications, and mortality from COVID-19 compared with the general population.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Among KTRs with COVID-19 in the United States, studies have shown hospitalization rates ranging from 32% to 100%,1,3, 4, 5, 6 intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates from 20% to 61%,2,4 and overall mortality of 13% to 39%.1,2,4, 5, 6 A high incidence of acute kidney injury was noted, ranging from 30% to 89%,2,4, 5, 6 while renal replacement therapy was required in 13% to 21% of patients.1,7 Given the natural history of COVID-19 pneumonia, most of these complications occurred ≥1 week after the diagnosis of COVID-19. Given the high impact of COVID-19 infection on KTRs, early COVID-19–directed therapies are critical. Bamlanivimab (LY-CoV555) was given Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the US Food and Drug Administration on November 9, 2020.8 It is a neutralizing IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, inhibiting attachment to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor. This EUA was given for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in patients ≥12 years of age weighing >40 kg who are positive with a direct viral testing for SARS-CoV-2 and have high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization.8 KTRs with COVID-19 are considered high risk because of immunosuppressive medication use.9 Studies on the use of bamlanivimab among KTRs are limited. To provide more insight on the use of bamlanivimab in KTRs we report our experience with 24 KTRs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Crystalglobulinemia causing cutaneous vasculopathy and acute nephropathy in a kidney transplant patient
    (Elsevier, 2021) Wilson, Chase; Phillips, Carrie L.; Klenk, Alison; Kuhar, Matthew; Yaqub, Muhammad S.; Dermatology, School of Medicine
    We present a rare case of crystalglobulinemia causing cutaneous vasculopathy and acute nephropathy in a 66-year-old female kidney transplant recipient. The patient presented with acute kidney injury (AKI), volume overload, anuria, retiform purpura, and blue-black necrosis of her toes. She received a living kidney transplant 7 months earlier with baseline creatinine of 0.6 mg/dl. Transplant kidney biopsy showed massive pseudo-thrombi filling glomerular capillary lumina. Electron microscopy of thrombi revealed an ultrastructural crystalline pattern of linear and curvilinear bundles with ladder-like periodicity typical of crystalglobulin-induced nephropathy. Similar crystalline pseudo-thrombi were detected ultrastructurally in a skin biopsy specimen, indicating systemic involvement. She required several sessions of hemodialysis. Plasmapheresis was initiated to decrease the number of circulating crystalglobulins. In order to treat the underlying paraproteinemia, the patient was started on bortezomib and dexamethasone. After treatment with five cycles of bortezomib, the patient's free kappa to lambda ratio improved to 2.35 from 5.52. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and the cutaneous vasculopathy gradually improved with treatment. This is an extremely rare occurrence of crystalglobulin in a living kidney transplant recipient.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A National Survey of Practice Patterns for Accepting Living Kidney Donors With Prior COVID-19
    (Science Direct, 2021-08-01) Jan, Muhammad Y.; Jawed, Areeba T.; Barros, Nicolas; Adebiyi, Oluwafisayo; Diez, Alejandro; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Goggins, William C.; Yaqub, Muhammad S.; Anderson, Melissa D.; Mujtaba, Muhammad A.; Taber, Tim E.; Mishler, Dennis P.; Kumar, Vineeta; Lentine, Krista L.; Sharfuddin, Asif A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction A critical question facing transplant programs is whether, when, and how to safely accept living kidney donors (LKDs) who have recovered from COVID-19 infection. The purpose of the study is to understand current practices related to accepting these LKDs. Methods We surveyed US transplant programs from 3 September through 3 November 2020. Center level and participant level responses were analyzed. Results A total of 174 respondents from 115 unique centers responded, representing 59% of US LKD programs and 72.4% of 2019 and 72.5% of 2020 LKD volume (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network-OPTN 2021). In all, 48.6% of responding centers had received inquiries from such LKDs, whereas 44.3% were currently evaluating. A total of 98 donors were in the evaluation phase, whereas 27.8% centers had approved 42 such donors to proceed with donation. A total of 50.8% of participants preferred to wait >3 months, and 91% would wait at least 1 month from onset of infection to LD surgery. The most common reason to exclude LDs was evidence of COVID-19−related AKI (59.8%) even if resolved, followed by COVID-19−related pneumonia (28.7%) and hospitalization (21.3%). The most common concern in accepting such donors was kidney health postdonation (59.2%), followed by risk of transmission to the recipient (55.7%), donor perioperative pulmonary risk (41.4%), and donor pulmonary risk in the future (29.9%). Conclusion Practice patterns for acceptance of COVID-19−recovered LKDs showed considerable variability. Ongoing research and consensus building are needed to guide optimal practices to ensure safety of accepting such donors. Long-term close follow-up of such donors is warranted.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Nondirected Living Kidney Donation and Recipient Outcomes in the United States: A 20-Year Review
    (Elsevier, 2022-03-22) Jan, Muhammad Y.; Yaqub, Muhammad S.; Adebiyi, Oluwafisayo O.; Taber, Tim E.; Anderson, Melissa D.; Mishler, Dennis P.; Burney, Heather N.; Li, Yang; Li, Xiaochun; Sharfuddin, Asif A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Nondirected donation (NDD) of the kidneys is a growing practice where donors who do not have any genetic or emotional relationship are selected to donate to a wide variety of recipients with a range of selection criteria and decisions which are left up to individual transplant centers. Methods: We review all adult living kidney donor-recipient (DR) pairs and outcomes from NDDs who were recorded in United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database as code 10 (anonymous) from October 1997 to September 2017 for demographics and outcomes. Results: A total of 2174 DR pairs were identified. The number of NDDs increased from 18 in 2000 to 256 in 2016. Survival analysis showed higher death-censored-graft survival (DC-GS) when recipient was 20 years or more older than donor followed by recipient-donor within 20 years of age and lowest when donor was 20 years or more older than recipient (P = 0.0114). Conclusion: Overall, the number of NDDs has increased significantly in the 20-year review period. Transplants from NDDs have excellent long-term outcomes. Better matching of controllable DR factors, such as age and body mass index (BMI), could further improve GS. Further research is needed to incorporate these DR factors into paired kidney donation programs potentially enhancing the utility and beneficence of this invaluable donation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Patient and Graft Survival Outcomes During 2 Eras of Immunosuppression Protocols in Kidney Transplantation: Indiana University Retrospective Cohort Experience
    (Elsevier, 2021-12) Adebiyi, Oluwafisayo; Umukoro, Peter; Sharfuddin, Asif; Taber, Tim; Chen, Jeanne; Lane, Kathleen A.; Li, Xiaochun; Goggins, Williams; Yaqub, Muhammad S.; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
    Background Since 1964 when Indiana University performed its first kidney transplant, immunosuppression protocol was steroid-based until 2004 when steroid-free immunosuppression protocol was adopted. We describe clinical outcomes on our patients administered early steroid withdrawal (ESW) protocol (5 days) compared with our historical cohort (HC), who were on chronic steroid-based immunosuppression. Methods We performed a retrospective study evaluating kidney transplant recipients between 1993 and 2003 (HC, n = 1689) and between 2005 and 2016 (ESW cohort, n = 2097) at the Indiana University program, with a median follow-up of 10.5 years and 6.1 years, respectively. Primary outcomes were patient and death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years in both study cohorts. Secondary outcomes were 1-year rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection; graft function at 1, 3, and 5 years; and risk of post-transplant infection (BK virus and cytomegalovirus) in the ESW cohort. Cox proportional model and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate survival probabilities. Fisher exact tests were used to compare episodes of acute rejection in the ESW cohort. Results No difference was observed in patient survival between the ESW and HC cohorts (P = .13). Compared with the ESW cohort, death-censored graft survival was significantly worse in the HC (5 year: 86.4% vs 90.6%, log-rank P < .001). One-year acute rejection reported in the ESW cohort alone was 15.7% and significantly worse in Black patients and younger patients (P < .05). Conclusions In this sizeable single-center cohort study with significant ethnic diversity, ESW is a viable alternative to steroid-based immunosuppression protocol in kidney transplant recipients.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Use of Long‐Term Monthly Basiliximab Infusions as Rescue Maintenance Immunosuppression in Pancreas Transplant Recipients
    (Wiley, 2024) Chen, Jeanne M.; Mangus, Richard S.; Sharfuddin, Asif A.; Powelson, John A.; Yaqub, Muhammad S.; Adebiyi, Oluwafisayo O.; Jan, Muhammad Y.; Lutz, Andrew J.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    This single-center retrospective study was designed to evaluate the use of basiliximab as an alternative rescue maintenance immunosuppression in situations where standard maintenance immunosuppression is not tolerated after a pancreas transplant. All pancreas transplants performed between January 11, 2006, and January 6, 2022, were reviewed. All recipients received rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction with tacrolimus + sirolimus maintenance for simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) and additional low-dose mycophenolic acid for pancreas transplant alone (PTA). Basiliximab 40mg IV q 4 weeks was either added to or in replacement of adjunct immunosuppression in cases of medication intolerance. All recipients who received ≥3 months of basiliximab with ≥1 year follow-up were included. 29/557 (5.2%) recipients (5 SPK and 24 PTA) were identified. Median time to switch was 13 months. When compared 1:2 to matched controls on standard immunosuppression, there was no difference in pancreas rejection, allograft loss, or mortality. Eleven recipients had 13 episodes of pancreas rejection at a median of 28 months post conversion. Eight pancreas allografts failed at a median of 28 months post conversion, and there were five deaths-all occurring in PTA, 4/5 occurring ≥1 year after discontinuation of basiliximab. Renal allograft rejection occurred in one SPK and there was one renal allograft loss. Five PTA developed renal failure. Ten remain on basiliximab (2/5 SPK, 8/24 PTA) at a median of 44 months with good pancreas and kidney function; 4 pts > 4 years. Basiliximab can be considered an alternative rescue maintenance strategy in pancreas transplant recipients who failed other conventional agents.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Vasopressin for Post-kidney Transplant Hypotension
    (Elsevier, 2022-04-07) Jan, Muhammad Y.; Moe, Sharon M.; Adebiyi, Oluwafisayo; Chen, Jeannie; Powelson, John; Burney, Heather N.; Yaqub, Muhammad S.; Mishler, Dennis P.; Moorthi, Ranjani N.; Taber, Tim E.; Anderson, Melissa D.; Li, Yang; Li, Xiaochun; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Goggins, William C.; Sharfuddin, Asif A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Hypotension after deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) is a risk factor for delayed graft function (DGF) and poor graft survival (GS). We hypothesize that vasopressin use in hypotensive DDKT recipients (DDKTRs) to increase blood pressure (BP) reduces DGF rates and is safe without increasing mortality. Methods: Group with vasopressin "study group" (n = 45) was defined as DDKTRs between 2012 and 2017 who required vasopressin for hypotension systolic BP (SBP) <120 mm Hg or diastolic BP (DBP) <60 mm Hg. DDKTRs with no-vasopressin "comparison group" (n = 90) were propensity score-matched DDKTRs between 2012 and 2017 without vasopressin use. Primary outcomes were GS, creatinine and allograft biopsy rate at 1 year, DGF rate, and death during transplant hospitalization. Results: Vasopressin group had lower mean maximum and minimum SBP and DBP in the operating room (OR). Median vasopressin start time post-DDKT was 2 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 1-6), and duration of use was 42 hours (IQR 24-63). DGF, creatinine at 1 year, and allograft biopsy rates were comparable. No deaths occurred during transplant hospitalization. Multivariable analysis did not find an effect of vasopressin use on GS. Conclusion: Treatment of hypotensive DDKTRs with vasopressin is safe and facilitated similar graft function and survival with that of nonhypotensive patients. In the absence of a randomized control trial, our study supports the safety of vasopressin therapy to prevent the adverse effects of hypotension.