Browsing by Author "Turk, Anita A."

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A phase I study of talazoparib (BMN 673) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCI9782)
    (Wiley, 2022) Leal, Ticiana A.; Sharifi, Marina N.; Chan, Nancy; Wesolowski, Robert; Turk, Anita A.; Bruce, Justine Y.; O'Regan, Ruth M.; Eickhoff, Jens; Barroilhet, Lisa M.; Malhotra, Jyoti; Mehnert, Janice; Girda, Eugenia; Wiley, Elizabeth; Schmitz, Natalie; Andrews, Shannon; Liu, Glenn; Wisinski, Kari B.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins potentiate antitumor activity of platinum chemotherapy. This study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of PARP inhibitor talazoparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Methods: We conducted a phase I study of talazoparib with carboplatin AUC5-6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 of 21-day cycles in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients enrolled using a 3 + 3 design in two cohorts with talazoparib for 7 (schedule A) or 3 days (schedule B). After induction with 4-6 cycles of triplet therapy, patients received one of three maintenance options: (a) continuation of triplet (b) carboplatin/talazoparib, or (c) talazoparib monotherapy. Results: Forty-three patients were treated. The MTD for both schedules was talazoparib 250mcg daily. The main toxicity was myelosuppression including grade 3/4 hematologic treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Dose modification occurred in 87% and 100% of patients for schedules A and B, respectively. Discontinuation due to TRAEs was 13% in schedule A and 10% in B. Ten out of 22 evaluable patients in schedule A and 5/16 patients in schedule B had a complete or partial response. Twelve out of 43 patients received ≥6 cycles of talazoparib after induction, with a 13-month median duration of maintenance. Conclusion: We have established the recommended phase II dose of Talazoparib at 250mcg on a 3- or 7-day schedule with carboplatin AUC6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 of 21-day cycles. This regimen is associated with significant myelosuppression, and in addition to maximizing supportive care, modification of the chemotherapy component would be a consideration for further development of this combination with the schedules investigated in this study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A phase I study of talazoparib (BMN 673) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCI9782)
    (Wiley, 2022-11) Leal, Ticiana A.; Sharifi, Marina N.; Chan, Nancy; Wesolowski, Robert; Turk, Anita A.; Bruce, Justine Y.; O'Regan, Ruth M.; Eickhoff, Jens; Barroilhet, Lisa M.; Malhotra, Jyoti; Mehnert, Janice; Girda, Eugenia; Wiley, Elizabeth; Schmitz, Natalie; Andrews, Shannon; Liu, Glenn; Wisinski, Kari B.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Inhibitors of poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins potentiate antitumor activity of platinum chemotherapy. This study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of PARP inhibitor talazoparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Methods We conducted a phase I study of talazoparib with carboplatin AUC5‐6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 of 21‐day cycles in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients enrolled using a 3 + 3 design in two cohorts with talazoparib for 7 (schedule A) or 3 days (schedule B). After induction with 4–6 cycles of triplet therapy, patients received one of three maintenance options: (a) continuation of triplet (b) carboplatin/talazoparib, or (c) talazoparib monotherapy. Results Forty‐three patients were treated. The MTD for both schedules was talazoparib 250mcg daily. The main toxicity was myelosuppression including grade 3/4 hematologic treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs). Dose modification occurred in 87% and 100% of patients for schedules A and B, respectively. Discontinuation due to TRAEs was 13% in schedule A and 10% in B. Ten out of 22 evaluable patients in schedule A and 5/16 patients in schedule B had a complete or partial response. Twelve out of 43 patients received ≥6 cycles of talazoparib after induction, with a 13‐month median duration of maintenance. Conclusion We have established the recommended phase II dose of Talazoparib at 250mcg on a 3‐ or 7‐day schedule with carboplatin AUC6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 of 21‐day cycles. This regimen is associated with significant myelosuppression, and in addition to maximizing supportive care, modification of the chemotherapy component would be a consideration for further development of this combination with the schedules investigated in this study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Acceptance and commitment therapy for fatigue interference in advanced gastrointestinal cancer and caregiver burden: protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial
    (BMC, 2021-04-20) Mosher, Catherine E.; Secinti, Ekin; Kroenke, Kurt; Helft, Paul R.; Turk, Anita A.; Loehrer, Patrick J., Sr.; Sehdev, Amikar; Al-Hader, Ahmad A.; Champion, Victoria L.; Johns, Shelley A.; Psychology, School of Science
    Background: Fatigue interference with activities, mood, and cognition is one of the most prevalent and bothersome concerns of advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients. As fatigue interferes with patient functioning, family caregivers often report feeling burdened by increasing responsibilities. Evidence-based interventions jointly addressing cancer patient fatigue interference and caregiver burden are lacking. In pilot studies, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has shown promise for addressing symptom-related suffering in cancer patients. The current pilot trial seeks to test a novel, dyadic ACT intervention for both advanced GI cancer patients with moderate-to-severe fatigue interference and their family caregivers with significant caregiving burden or distress. Methods: A minimum of 40 patient-caregiver dyads will be randomly assigned to either the ACT intervention or an education/support control condition. Dyads in both conditions attend six weekly 50-min telephone sessions. Outcomes are assessed at baseline as well as 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention. We will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of ACT for improving patient fatigue interference and caregiver burden. Secondary outcomes include patient sleep interference and patient and caregiver engagement in daily activities, psychological flexibility, and quality of life. We will also explore the effects of ACT on patient and caregiver physical and mental health service use. Discussion: Findings will inform a large-scale trial of intervention efficacy. Results will also lay the groundwork for further novel applications of ACT to symptom interference with functioning and caregiver burden in advanced cancer.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Acceptance and commitment therapy for patient fatigue interference and caregiver burden in advanced gastrointestinal cancer: Results of a pilot randomized trial
    (Sage, 2022) Mosher, Catherine E.; Secinti, Ekin; Wu, Wei; Kashy, Deborah A.; Kroenke, Kurt; Bricker, Jonathan B.; Helft, Paul R.; Turk, Anita A.; Loehrer, Patrick J., Sr.; Sehdev, Amikar; Al-Hader, Ahmad A.; Champion, Victoria L.; Johns, Shelley A.; Psychology, School of Science
    Background: Fatigue often interferes with functioning in patients with advanced cancer, resulting in increased family caregiver burden. Acceptance and commitment therapy, a promising intervention for cancer-related suffering, has rarely been applied to dyads coping with advanced cancer. Aim: To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for patient-caregiver dyads coping with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Primary outcomes were patient fatigue interference and caregiver burden. Design: In this pilot trial, dyads were randomized to six weekly sessions of telephone-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy or education/support, an attention control. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention. Setting/participants: Forty patients with stage III-IV gastrointestinal cancer and fatigue interference and family caregivers with burden or distress were recruited from two oncology clinics and randomized. Results: The eligibility screening rate (54%) and retention rate (81% at 2 weeks post-intervention) demonstrated feasibility. At 2 weeks post-intervention, acceptance and commitment therapy participants reported high intervention helpfulness (mean=4.25/5.00). Group differences in outcomes were not statistically significant. However, when examining within-group change, acceptance and commitment therapy patients showed moderate decline in fatigue interference at both follow-ups, whereas education/support patients did not show improvement at either follow-up. Acceptance and commitment therapy caregivers showed medium decline in burden at 2 weeks that was not sustained at 3 months, whereas education/support caregivers showed little change in burden. Conclusions: Acceptance and commitment therapy showed strong feasibility, acceptability, and promise and warrants further testing.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of acceptance and commitment therapy on physical and psychological symptoms in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients and caregivers: Secondary results of a pilot randomized trial
    (Elsevier, 2023) Burns, Marcia F.; Secinti, Ekin; Johns, Shelley A.; Wu, Wei; Helft, Paul R.; Turk, Anita A.; Loehrer, Patrick J.; Sehdev, Amikar; Al-Hader, Ahmad A.; Mosher, Catherine E.; Psychology, School of Science
    Patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer often experience high symptom burden, which is associated with heightened distress in both patients and their family caregivers. Few interventions have been tested to jointly address patient and caregiver symptoms in advanced gastrointestinal cancer. In a randomized pilot trial, telephone-based, dyadic acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) was found to be feasible in this population. The present secondary analyses examined the impact of this intervention on patient and caregiver physical and psychological symptoms. Patients and caregivers (N = 40 dyads) were recruited from clinics in Indianapolis, Indiana and randomized to either six weeks of telephone-based ACT or education/support, an attention control condition. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks and 3 months post-intervention. Study group differences in outcomes were not statistically significant. However, when examining within-group change, only ACT patients experienced moderate reductions in pain severity and interference at 2 weeks post-intervention (effect size [ES]=−0.47; −0.51) as well as moderate reductions in depressive symptoms at 2 weeks (ES=−0.42) and 3 months (ES=−0.41) post-intervention. ACT caregivers experienced moderate reductions in sleep disturbance (ES=−0.56; −0.49) and cognitive concerns (ES=−0.61; −0.85) across follow-ups. Additionally, caregivers in both conditions experienced moderate reductions in fatigue (ES=−0.38 to −0.70) and anxiety (ES=−0.40 to −0.49) across follow-ups. Findings suggest that ACT may improve certain symptoms in dyads coping with advanced gastrointestinal cancer and warrant replication in a larger trial.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Making National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center Knowledge Accessible to Community Oncologists via an Online Tumor Board: Longitudinal Observational Study
    (JMIR, 2022-05-19) Kalra, Maitri; Henry, Elizabeth; McCann, Kelly; Karuturi, Meghan S.; Bustamante Alvarez, Jean G.; Parkes, Amanda; Wesolowski, Robert; Wei, Mei; Mougalian, Sarah S.; Durm, Gregory; Qin, Angel; Schonewolf, Caitlin; Trivedi, Meghna; Armaghani, Avan J.; Wilson, Frederick H.; Iams, Wade T.; Turk, Anita A.; Vikas, Praveen; Cecchini, Michael; Lubner, Sam; Pathak, Priyadarshini; Spencer, Kristen; Koshkin, Vadim S.; Labriola, Matthew K.; Marshall, Catherine H.; Beckermann, Katy E.; theMednet.org NCI-CCC Tumor Board Program Collaborative Group; Sharifi, Marina N.; Bejjani, Anthony C.; Hotchandani, Varsha; Housri, Samir; Housri, Nadine; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Expert knowledge is often shared among multidisciplinary academic teams at tumor boards (TBs) across the country, but these conversations exist in silos and do not reach the wider oncology community. Objective: Using an oncologist-only question and answer (Q&A) website, we sought to document expert insights from TBs at National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCI-CCCs) to provide educational benefits to the oncology community. Methods: We designed a process with the NCI-CCCs to document and share discussions from the TBs focused on areas of practice variation on theMednet, an interactive Q&A website of over 13,000 US oncologists. The faculty translated the TB discussions into concise, non-case-based Q&As on theMednet. Answers were peer reviewed and disseminated in email newsletters to registered oncologists. Reach and engagement were measured. Following each Q&A, a survey question asked how the TB Q&As impacted the readers' practice. Results: A total of 23 breast, thoracic, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary programs from 16 NCI-CCC sites participated. Between December 2016 and July 2021, the faculty highlighted 368 questions from their TBs. Q&As were viewed 147,661 times by 7381 oncologists at 3515 institutions from all 50 states. A total of 277 (75%) Q&As were viewed every month. Of the 1063 responses to a survey question on how the Q&A affected clinicians' practices, 646 (61%) reported that it confirmed their current practice, 163 (20%) indicated that a Q&A would change their future practice, and 214 (15%) reported learning something new. Conclusions: Through an online Q&A platform, academics at the NCI-CCCs share knowledge outside the walls of academia with oncologists across the United States. Access to up-to-date expert knowledge can reassure clinicians' practices, significantly impact patient care in community practices, and be a source of new knowledge and education.