Browsing by Author "Tonismae, Tiffany"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Antenatal Periviability Counseling and Decision Making: A Retrospective Examination by the Investigating Neonatal Decisions for Extremely Early Deliveries Study Group
    (Thieme, 2020) Feltman, Dalia; Fritz, Katie A.; Datta, Avisek; Carlos, Christine; Hayslett, Drew; Tonismae, Tiffany; Lawrence, Christin; Batton, Emily; Coleman, Tasha; Jain, Meenu; Andrews, Bree; Famuyide, Mobolaji; Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne; Laventhal, Naomi; Leuthner, Steven; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Objective To describe periviability counseling practices and decision making. Study Design This is a retrospective review of mothers and newborns delivering between 22 and 24 completed weeks from 2011 to 2015 at six U.S. centers. Maternal and fetal/neonatal clinical and maternal sociodemographic data from medical records and geocoded sociodemographic information were collected. Separate analyses examined characteristics surrounding receiving neonatology consultation; planning neonatal resuscitation; and centers' planned resuscitation rates. Results Neonatology consultations were documented for 40, 63, and 72% of 498 mothers delivering at 22, 23, and 24 weeks, respectively. Consult versus no-consult mothers had longer median admission-to-delivery intervals (58.7 vs. 8.7 h, p < 0.001). Consultations were seen more frequently when parental decision making was evident. In total, 76% of mothers had neonatal resuscitation planned. Resuscitation versus no-resuscitation newborns had higher mean gestational ages (24.0 vs. 22.9 weeks, p < 0.001) and birthweights (618 vs. 469 g, p < 0.001). Planned resuscitation rates differed at higher (HR) versus lower (LR) rate centers at 22 (43 vs. 7%, p < 0.001) and 23 (85 vs. 58%, p < 0.001) weeks. HR versus LR centers' populations had more socioeconomic hardship markers but fewer social work consultations (odds ratio: 0.31; confidence interval: 0.15–0.59, p < 0.001). Conclusion Areas requiring improvement included delivery/content of neonatology consultations, social work support, consideration of centers' patient populations, and opportunities for shared decisions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Trial Assessing Resident Performance After Novel Video Instruction
    (Cureus, 2021-06-05) Shanks, Anthony L.; Brann, Maria; Bute, Jennifer J.; Borse, Vyvian; Tonismae, Tiffany; Scott, Nikki; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Introduction; Delivering bad news to patients is an essential skill for physicians, which is often developed through patient encounters. Residents in our program participate in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) on an annual basis to evaluate their skills in these scenarios. Our objectives were to develop an educational video and determine if an educational video provided to residents prior to OSCEs would improve performance. Methods: Previous OSCEs were reviewed to identify best practices and to create a four-minute video highlighting the "do's and don'ts" of delivering bad news. Residents in two post-graduate year (PGY) classes were randomized to watch the video prior to or after a standardized patient encounter. Three masked reviewers assessed resident empathy, attention, and understanding on 10 five-point Likert scales and assigned a total score (scale: 0-50). Hedges' g was used to assess mean scores and effect size. Results: A total of 17 residents participated in the evaluation: nine in the pre-OSCE video group and eight in the control group. Residents randomized to the video prior to the patient encounter had a mean score of 37.01 (SD=3.6). Residents randomized to the control group had a mean score of 35.38 (SD=4.85). Hedges' g was 0.37 (95% CI: -0.59 to 1.33). Conclusion: Residents randomized to the video group had a small increase in OSCE performance, which was not statistically significant. The novel video was helpful and addresses the need for a quick pre-assessment educational tool, though interns and graduating medical students may be a more appropriate target audience for instruction.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Patients with Mood Disorders Require Higher Doses of Buprenorphine for Management of Opioid Use Disorder But Have No Increased Risk of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
    (Metrodora, 2021) Tonismae, Tiffany; McDowell, Misty; Torres, Loraine; Slaven, James E.; Quinney, Sara K.; Schubert, Frank; Pell Abernathy, Mary; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Objective: This study compared differences in buprenorphine doses needed to treat opioid use disorder in pregnant women with and without mood disorders and to compare the development of neonatal abstinence syndrome in infants delivered to mothers treated with buprenorphine in patients with history of mood disorders versus those without mood disorder. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included women with opioid use disorder prescribed buprenorphine who had at least one outpatient visit at with the Indiana University Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine during pregnancy and delivered within the Indiana University Health system. Charts were reviewed for maternal demographics, medical history and medication use, and neonatal outcomes. Cases included those patients with history of mood disorder including depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder based on initial appointment intake forms. Starting and maximum doses of buprenorphine during pregnancy were recorded. Outcomes were compared using Student’s t-tests and Analysis of Variance models for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. All analytic assumptions were verified, with non-parametric tests being performed where necessary. Results: A total of 266 women were treated with opioids, of which 171 were diagnosed with a mood disorder: 148 depression, 130 anxiety, and 19 post-traumatic stress disorder. Over 40% of the patients had a history of dual diagnoses. Patients with a history of depression or anxiety required a higher dose of buprenorphine during pregnancy (p=0.0217, p=0.0165) compared to those without a history of mood disorder. There was no significant difference in the doses in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder versus controls. In those with a diagnosis of mood disorder, there was no difference in buprenorphine dose between women on medication versus those not on medication for depression, anxiety, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. There was no statistical difference between patients with or without mood disorder and the development of neonatal abstinence syndrome. For those that developed neonatal abstinence syndrome, infants whose mothers had anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder required 2-6 extra days of morphine treatment compared to those infants of mothers without mood disorder (p=0.0088, p=0.0291), no difference seen for depression or a combination of mood disorders. Development of neonatal abstinence syndrome or length of treatment did not vary if the mother was on medication for treatment of her mood disorder. Conclusion: Pregnant women with a mood disorder require higher doses of buprenorphine compared to patients without a mood disorder. In women with mood disorders, there was no difference in buprenorphine dose in women treated with medication compared to those not taking medication for mood disorders. While, there was no difference in the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome in infants whose mothers also had a mood disorder, infants born of women with anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder had longer stays at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit as they needed 2-6 extra days of morphine treatment. These findings may help guide provider counseling of these women in discussion of post-delivery expectations.