Browsing by Author "Schultz, Kirk R."

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The Biology of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Task Force Report from the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease
    (Elsevier, 2017-02) Cooke, Kenneth R.; Luznik, Leo; Sarantopoulos, Stefanie; Hakim, Frances T.; Jagasia, Madan; Fowler, Daniel H.; van den Brink, Marcel R. M.; Hansen, John A.; Parkman, Robertson; Miklos, David B.; Martin, Paul J.; Paczesny, Sophie; Vogelsang, Georgia; Pavletic, Steven; Ritz, Jerome; Schultz, Kirk R.; Blazar, Bruce R.; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the leading cause of late, nonrelapse mortality and disability in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients and a major obstacle to improving outcomes. The biology of chronic GVHD remains enigmatic, but understanding the underpinnings of the immunologic mechanisms responsible for the initiation and progression of disease is fundamental to developing effective prevention and treatment strategies. The goals of this task force review are as follows: • Summarize the current state of the science regarding pathogenic mechanisms of chronic GVHD and critical knowledge gaps. • Develop working hypotheses/overriding concepts for chronic GVHD development. • Define the usefulness of current preclinical models to test working hypotheses and ultimately discover and develop new therapeutic strategies. • Identify shortcomings of preclinical models, and define criteria for the creation of additional models to address these limitations. This document is intended as a review of our understanding of chronic GVHD biology and therapies resulting from preclinical studies, and as a platform for developing innovative clinical strategies to prevent and treat chronic GVHD.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Composite GRFS and CRFS Outcomes After Adult Alternative Donor HCT
    (American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020-06-20) Mehta, Rohtesh S.; Holtan, Shernan G.; Wang, Tao; Hemmer, Michael T.; Spellman, Stephen R.; Arora, Mukta; Couriel, Daniel R.; Alousi, Amin M.; Pidala, Joseph; Abdel-Azim, Hisham; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Ahmed, Ibrahim A.; Al-Homsi, Samer; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Antin, Joseph H.; Askar, Medhat; Auletta, Jeffery J.; Bhatt, Vijaya Raj; Chee, Lynette; Chhabra, Saurabh; Daly, Andrew; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Gajewski, James; Gale, Robert Peter; Gergis, Usama; Hematti, Peiman; Hildebrandt, Gerhard C.; Hogan, William J.; Inamoto, Yoshihiro; Martino, Rodrigo; Majhail, Navneet S.; Marks, David I.; Nishihori, Taiga; Olsson, Richard F.; Pawarode, Attaphol; Diaz, Miguel Angel; Prestidge, Tim; Rangarajan, Hemalatha G.; Ringden, Olle; Saad, Ayman; Savani, Bipin N.; Schoemans, Hélène; Seo, Sachiko; Schultz, Kirk R.; Solh, Melhem; Spitzer, Thomas; Storek, Jan; Teshima, Takanori; Verdonck, Leo F.; Wirk, Baldeep; Yared, Jean A.; Cahn, Jean-Yves; Weisdorf, Daniel J.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Purpose: There is no consensus on the best choice of an alternative donor (umbilical cord blood [UCB], haploidentical, one-antigen mismatched [7/8]-bone marrow [BM], or 7/8-peripheral blood [PB]) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients lacking an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor. Methods: We report composite end points of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD)-free relapse-free survival (CRFS) in 2,198 patients who underwent UCB (n = 838), haploidentical (n = 159), 7/8-BM (n = 241), or 7/8-PB (n = 960) HCT. All groups were divided by myeloablative conditioning (MAC) intensity or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), except haploidentical group in which most received RIC. To account for multiple testing, P < .0071 in multivariable analysis and P < .00025 in direct pairwise comparisons were considered statistically significant. Results: In multivariable analysis, haploidentical group had the best GRFS, CRFS, and overall survival (OS). In the direct pairwise comparison of other groups, among those who received MAC, there was no difference in GRFS or CRFS among UCB, 7/8-BM, and 7/8-PB with serotherapy (alemtuzumab or antithymocyte globulin) groups. In contrast, the 7/8-PB without serotherapy group had significantly inferior GRFS, higher cGVHD, and a trend toward worse CRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.69; P = .002) than the 7/8-BM group and higher cGVHD and trend toward inferior CRFS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.63; P = .0006) than the UCB group. Among patients with RIC, all groups had significantly inferior GRFS and CRFS compared with the haploidentical group. Conclusion: Recognizing the limitations of a registry retrospective analysis and the possibility of center selection bias in choosing donors, our data support the use of UCB, 7/8-BM, or 7/8-PB (with serotherapy) grafts for patients undergoing MAC HCT and haploidentical grafts for patients undergoing RIC HCT. The haploidentical group had the best GRFS, CRFS, and OS of all groups.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on outcomes of adult Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a study by the Acute Leukemia Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research
    (Ferrata Storti Foundation, 2019-09-26) Lazaryan, Aleksandr; Dolan, Michelle; Zhang, Mei-Jie; Wang, Hai-Lin; Kharfan-Dabaja, Mohamed A.; Marks, David I.; Bejanyan, Nelli; Copelan, Edward; Majhail, Navneet S.; Waller, Edmund K.; Chao, Nelson; Prestidge, Tim; Nishihori, Taiga; Kebriaei, Partow; Inamoto, Yoshihiro; Hamilton, Betty; Hashmi, Shahrukh K.; Kamble, Rammurti T.; Bacher, Ulrike; Hildebrandt, Gerhard C.; Stiff, Patrick J.; McGuirk, Joseph; Aldoss, Ibrahim; Beitinjaneh, Amer M.; Muffly, Lori; Vij, Ravi; Olsson, Richard F.; Byrne, Michael; Schultz, Kirk R.; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Seftel, Matthew; Savoie, Mary Lynn; Savani, Bipin N.; Verdonck, Leo F.; Cairo, Mitchell S.; Hossain, Nasheed; Bhatt, Vijaya Raj; Frangoul, Haydar A.; Abdel-Azim, Hisham; Al Malki, Monzr; Munker, Reinhold; Rizzieri, David; Khera, Nandita; Nakamura, Ryotaro; Ringdén, Olle; van der Poel, Marjolein; Murthy, Hemant S.; Liu, Hongtao; Mori, Shahram; De Oliveira, Satiro; Bolaños-Meade, Javier; Elsawy, Mahmoud; Barba, Pere; Nathan, Sunita; George, Biju; Pawarode, Attaphol; Grunwald, Michael; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Wang, Youjin; Assal, Amer; Castillo Caro, Paul; Kuwatsuka, Yachiyo; Seo, Sachiko; Ustun, Celalettin; Politikos, Ioannis; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Saber, Wael; Sandmaier, Brenda M.; De Lima, Marcos; Litzow, Mark; Bachanova, Veronika; Weisdorf, Daniel; Acute Leukemia Committee of the CIBMTR; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Cytogenetic risk stratification at diagnosis has long been one of the most useful tools to assess prognosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To examine the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, we studied 1731 adults with Philadelphia-negative ALL in complete remission who underwent myeloablative or reduced intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning transplant from unrelated or matched sibling donors reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. A total of 632 patients had abnormal conventional metaphase cytogenetics. The leukemia-free survival and overall survival rates at 5 years after transplantation in patients with abnormal cytogenetics were 40% and 42%, respectively, which were similar to those in patients with a normal karyotype. Of the previously established cytogenetic risk classifications, modified Medical Research Council-Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score was the only independent prognosticator of leukemia-free survival (P=0.03). In the multivariable analysis, monosomy 7 predicted post-transplant relapse [hazard ratio (HR)=2.11; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.04-4.27] and treatment failure (HR=1.97; 95% CI: 1.20-3.24). Complex karyotype was prognostic for relapse (HR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.06-2.69), whereas t(8;14) predicted treatment failure (HR=2.85; 95% CI: 1.35-6.02) and overall mortality (HR=3.03; 95% CI: 1.44-6.41). This large study suggested a novel transplant-specific cytogenetic scheme with adverse [monosomy 7, complex karyotype, del(7q), t(8;14), t(11;19), del(11q), tetraploidy/near triploidy], intermediate (normal karyotype and all other abnormalities), and favorable (high hyperdiploidy) risks to prognosticate leukemia-free survival (P=0.02). Although some previously established high-risk Philadelphia-negative cytogenetic abnormalities in ALL can be overcome by transplantation, monosomy 7, complex karyotype, and t(8;14) continue to pose significant risks and yield inferior outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of T Cell Dose on Outcome of T Cell-Replete HLA-Matched Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
    (Elsevier, 2019) Saad, Ayman; Lamb, Lawrence; Wang, Tao; Hemmer, Michael T.; Spellman, Stephen; Couriel, Daniel; Alousi, Amin; Pidala, Joseph; Abdel-Azim, Hisham; Agrawal, Vaibhav; Aljurf, Mahmoud; Beitinjaneh, Amer M.; Bhatt, Vijaya Raj; Buchbinder, David; Byrne, Michael; Cahn, Jean-Yves; Cairo, Mitchell; Castillo, Paul; Chhabra, Saurabh; Diaz, Miguel Angel; Farhan, Shatha; Floisand, Yngvar; Frangoul, Hadar A.; Gadalla, Shahinaz M.; Gajewski, James; Gale, Robert Peter; Gandhi, Manish; Gergis, Usama; Hamilton, Betty Ky; Hematti, Peiman; Hildebrandt, Gerhard C.; Kamble, Rammurti T.; Kanate, Abraham S.; Khandelwal, Pooja; Lazaryn, Aleksandr; MacMillan, Margaret; Marks, David I.; Martino, Rodrigo; Mehta, Parinda A.; Nishihori, Taiga; Olsson, Richard F.; Patel, Sagar S.; Qayed, Muna; Rangarajan, Hemalatha G.; Reshef, Ran; Ringden, Olle; Savani, Bipin N.; Schouten, Harry C.; Schultz, Kirk R.; Seo, Sachiko; Shaffer, Brian C.; Solh, Melhem; Teshima, Takanori; Urbano-Ispizua, Alvaro; Verdonck, Leo F.; Vij, Ravi; Waller, Edmund K.; William, Basem; Wirk, Baldeep; Yared, Jean A.; Yu, Lolie C.; Arora, Mukta; Hashmi, Shahrukh; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Data on whether the T cell dose of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) products influences transplantation outcomes are conflicting. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we identified 2736 adult patients who underwent first allogeneic PBSC transplantation for acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome between 2008 and 2014 using an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) or an 8/8-matched unrelated donor (MUD). We excluded ex vivo and in vivo T cell-depleted transplantations. Correlative analysis was performed between CD3+ T cell dose and the risk of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Using maximum likelihood estimation, we identified CD3+ T cell dose cutoff that separated the risk of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grade II-IV in both the MSD and MUD groups. A CD3+ T cell dose cutoff of 14 × 107 cells/kg identified MSD/low CD3+ (n = 223) and MSD/high CD3+ (n = 1214), and a dose of 15 × 107 cells/kg identified MUD/low CD3+ (n = 197) and MUD/high CD3+ (n = 1102). On univariate analysis, the MSD/high CD3+ group had a higher cumulative incidence of day +100 aGVHD grade II-IV compared with the MSD/low CD3+ group (33% versus 25%; P = .009). There were no differences between the 2 groups in engraftment rate, risk of aGVHD grade III-IV or chronic GVHD (cGVHD), NRM, relapse, DFS, or OS. The MUD/high CD3+ group had a higher cumulative incidence of day +100 aGVHD grade II-IV compared with the MUD/low CD3+ group (49% versus 41%; P = .04). There were no differences between the 2 groups in engraftment rate, risk of severe aGVHD or cGVHD, NRM, relapse, DFS, or OS. Multivariate analysis of the MSD and MUD groups failed to show an association between CD3+ T cell dose and the risk of either aGVHD grade II-IV (P = .10 and .07, respectively) or cGVHD (P = .80 and .30, respectively). Subanalysis of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and CD4+/CD8+ ratio failed to identify cutoff values predictive of transplantation outcomes; however, using the log-rank test, the sample size was suboptimal for identifying a difference at this cutoff cell dose. In this registry study, the CD3+ T cell dose of PBSC products did not influence the risk of aGVHD or cGVHD or other transplantation outcomes when using an MSD or an 8/8-matched MUD. Subset analyses of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell doses were not possible given our small sample size.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: III. The 2014 Biomarker Working Group Report
    (Elsevier B.V., 2015-05) Paczesny, Sophie; Hakim, Frances T.; Pidala, Joseph; Cooke, Kenneth; Lathrop, Julia; Griffith, Linda M.; Hansen, John; Jagasia, Madan; Miklos, David; Pavletic, Steven; Parkman, Robertson; Russek-Cohen, Estelle; Flowers, Mary E.D.; Lee, Stephanie; Martin, Paul; Vogelsang, Georgia; Walton, Marc; Schultz, Kirk R.; Department of Pediatrics, IU School of Medicine
    Biology-based markers to confirm or aid in the diagnosis or prognosis of chronic GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or monitor its progression are critically needed to facilitate evaluation of new therapies. Biomarkers have been defined as any characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of a normal biological or pathogenic process, a pharmacologic response to a therapeutic intervention. Applications of biomarkers in chronic GVHD clinical trials or patient management include: a) diagnosis and assessment of chronic GVHD disease activity, including distinguishing irreversible damage from continued disease activity, b) prognostic risk to develop chronic GVHD, and c) prediction of response to therapy. Sample collection for chronic GVHD biomarkers studies should be well-documented following established quality control guidelines for sample acquisition, processing, preservation and testing, at intervals that are both calendar- and event-driven. The consistent therapeutic treatment of subjects and standardized documentation needed to support biomarker studies are most likely to be provided in prospective clinical trials. To date, no chronic GVHD biomarkers have been qualified for utilization in clinical applications. Since our previous chronic GVHD Biomarkers Working Group report in 2005, an increasing number of chronic GVHD candidate biomarkers are available for further investigation. This paper provides a four-part framework for biomarker investigations: identification, verification, qualification, and application with terminology based on Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines.