Browsing by Author "Saunders-Pullman, Rachel"
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Cancer outcomes among Parkinson's disease patients with leucine rich repeat kinase 2 mutations, idiopathic Parkinson's disease patients, and nonaffected controls(Wiley, 2019-09) Agalliu, llir; Ortega, Roberto A.; San Luciano, Marta; Mirelman, Anat; Pont-Sunyer, Claustre; Brockmann, Kathrin; Vilas, Dolores; Tolosa, Eduardo; Berg, Daniela; Warø, Bjørg; Glickman, Amanda; Raymond, Deborah; Inzelberg, Rivka; Ruiz-Martinez, Javier; Mondragon, Elisabet; Friedman, Eitan; Hassin-Baer, Sharon; Alcalay, Roy N.; Mejia-Santana, Helen; Aasly, Jan; Foroud, Tatiana; Marder, Karen; Giladi, Nir; Bressman, Susan; Saunders-Pullman, Rachel; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineBACKGROUND: Increased cancer risk has been reported in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients carrying the leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) G2019S mutation (LRRK2-PD) in comparison with idiopathic PD (IPD). It is unclear whether the elevated risk would be maintained when compared with unaffected controls. METHODS: Cancer outcomes were compared among 257 LRRK2-PD patients, 712 IPD patients, and 218 controls recruited from 7 LRRK2 consortium centers using mixed-effects logistic regression. Data were then pooled with a previous study to examine cancer risk between 401 LRRK2-PD and 1946 IPD patients. RESULTS: Although cancer prevalence was similar among LRRK2-PD patients (32.3%), IPD patients (27.5%), and controls (27.5%; P = 0.33), LRRK2-PD had increased risks of leukemia (odds ratio [OR] = 4.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-10.61) and skin cancer (OR = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.09-2.37). In the pooled analysis, LRRK2-PD patients had also elevated risks of leukemia (OR = 9.84; 95% CI, 2.15-44.94) and colon cancer (OR = 2.34; 95% CI, 1.15-4.74) when compared with IPD patients. CONCLUSIONS: The increased risks of leukemia as well as skin and colon cancers among LRRK2-PD patients suggest that LRRK2 mutations heighten risks of certain cancers. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.Item Finding useful biomarkers for Parkinson's disease(American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2018-08-15) Chen-Plotkin, Alice S.; Albin, Roger; Alcalay, Roy; Babcock, Debra; Bajaj, Vikram; Bowman, Dubois; Buko, Alex; Cedarbaum, Jesse; Chelsky, Daniel; Cookson, Mark; Dawson, Ted; Dewey, Richard; Foroud, Tatiana; Frasier, Mark; German, Dwight; Gwinn, Katrina; Huang, Xuemei; Kopil, Catherine; Kremer, Thomas; Lasch, Shirley; Marek, Ken; Marto, Jarrod; Merchant, Kalpana; Mollenhauer, Brit; Naito, Anna; Potashkin, Judith; Reimer, Alyssa; Rosenthal, Liana; Saunders-Pullman, Rachel; Scherzer, Clemens R.; Sherer, Todd; Singleton, Andrew; Sutherland, Margaret; Thiele, Ines; van der Brug, Marcel; Van Keuren-Jensen, Kendall; Vaillancourt, David; Walt, David; West, Andrew; Zhang, Jing; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineParkinson’s Disease affects more than 4 million people worldwide, and biomarkers to bolster the therapeutic development pipeline are urgently needed. The recent advent of an “ecosystem” of shared biosample biorepositories and data enables us to consider how to focus PD biomarker activity to best translate efforts into real-world impact.Item Genetic Testing for Parkinson Disease: Are We Ready?(American Academy of Neurology, 2021-02) Cook, Lola; Schulze, Jeanine; Kopil, Catherine; Hastings, Tara; Naito, Anna; Wojcieszek, Joanne; Payne, Katelyn; Alcalay, Roy N.; Klein, Christine; Saunders-Pullman, Rachel; Simuni, Tatyana; Foroud, Tatiana; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicinePurpose of review: With the advent of precision medicine and demand for genomic testing information, we may question whether it is time to offer genetic testing to our patients with Parkinson disease (PD). This review updates the current genetic landscape of PD, describes what genetic testing may offer, provides strategies for evaluating whom to test, and provides resources for the busy clinician. Recent findings: Patients with PD and their relatives, in various settings, have expressed an interest in learning their PD genetic status; however, physicians may be hesitant to widely offer testing due to the perceived low clinical utility of PD genetic test results. The rise of clinical trials available for patients with gene-specific PD and emerging information on genotype-phenotype correlations are starting to shift this discussion about testing. Summary: By learning more about the various genetic testing options for PD and utility of results for patients and their care, clinicians may become more comfortable with widespread PD genetic testing in the research and clinical setting.Item Genetic Testing in Parkinson's Disease(Wiley, 2023) Pal, Gian; Cook, Lola; Schulze, Jeanine; Verbrugge, Jennifer; Alcalay, Roy N.; Merello, Marcelo; Sue, Carolyn M.; Bardien, Soraya; Bonifati, Vincenzo; Chung, Sun Ju; Foroud, Tatiana; Gatto, Emilia; Hall, Anne; Hattori, Nobutaka; Lynch, Tim; Marder, Karen; Mascalzoni, Deborah; Novaković, Ivana; Thaler, Avner; Raymond, Deborah; Salari, Mehri; Shalash, Ali; Suchowersky, Oksana; Mencacci, Niccolò E.; Simuni, Tanya; Saunders-Pullman, Rachel; Klein, Christine; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineGenetic testing for persons with Parkinson's disease is becoming increasingly common. Significant gains have been made regarding genetic testing methods, and testing is becoming more readily available in clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer settings. Although the potential utility of clinical testing is expanding, there are currently no proven gene-targeted therapies, but clinical trials are underway. Furthermore, genetic testing practices vary widely, as do knowledge and attitudes of relevant stakeholders. The specter of testing mandates financial, ethical, and physician engagement, and there is a need for guidelines to help navigate the myriad of challenges. However, to develop guidelines, gaps and controversies need to be clearly identified and analyzed. To this end, we first reviewed recent literature and subsequently identified gaps and controversies, some of which were partially addressed in the literature, but many of which are not well delineated or researched. Key gaps and controversies include: (1) Is genetic testing appropriate in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals without medical actionability? (2) How, if at all, should testing vary based on ethnicity? (3) What are the long-term outcomes of consumer- and research-based genetic testing in presymptomatic PD? (4) What resources are needed for clinical genetic testing, and how is this impacted by models of care and cost-benefit considerations? Addressing these issues will help facilitate the development of consensus and guidelines regarding the approach and access to genetic testing and counseling. This is also needed to guide a multidisciplinary approach that accounts for cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic factors in developing testing guidelines.Item Genomewide Association Studies of LRRK2 Modifiers of Parkinson's Disease(Wiley, 2021-07) Lai, Dongbing; Alipanahi, Babak; Fontanillas, Pierre; Schwantes, Tae-Hwi; Aasly, Jan; Alcalay, Roy N.; Beecham, Gary W.; Berg, Daniela; Bressman, Susan; Brice, Alexis; Brockman, Kathrin; Clark, Lorraine; Cookson, Mark; Das, Sayantan; Van Deerlin, Vivianna; Follett, Jordan; Farrer, Matthew J.; Trinh, Joanne; Gasser, Thomas; Goldwurm, Stefano; Gustavsson, Emil; Klein, Christine; Lang, Anthony E.; Langston, J. William; Latourelle, Jeanne; Lynch, Timothy; Marder, Karen; Marras, Connie; Martin, Eden R.; McLean, Cory Y.; Mejia-Santana, Helen; Molho, Eric; Myers, Richard H.; Nuytemans, Karen; Ozelius, Laurie; Payami, Haydeh; Raymond, Deborah; Rogaeva, Ekaterina; Rogers, Michael P.; Ross, Owen A.; Samii, Ali; Saunders-Pullman, Rachel; Schüle, Birgitt; Schulte, Claudia; Scott, William K.; Tanner, Caroline; Tolosa, Eduardo; Tomkins, James E.; Vilas, Dolores; Trojanowski, John Q.; Uitti, Ryan; Vance, Jeffery M.; Visanji, Naomi P.; Wszolek, Zbigniew K.; Zabetian, Cyrus P.; Mirelman, Anat; Giladi, Nir; Urtreger, Avi Orr; Cannon, Paul; Fiske, Brian; Foroud, Tatiana; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineObjective: The aim of this study was to search for genes/variants that modify the effect of LRRK2 mutations in terms of penetrance and age-at-onset of Parkinson's disease. Methods: We performed the first genomewide association study of penetrance and age-at-onset of Parkinson's disease in LRRK2 mutation carriers (776 cases and 1,103 non-cases at their last evaluation). Cox proportional hazard models and linear mixed models were used to identify modifiers of penetrance and age-at-onset of LRRK2 mutations, respectively. We also investigated whether a polygenic risk score derived from a published genomewide association study of Parkinson's disease was able to explain variability in penetrance and age-at-onset in LRRK2 mutation carriers. Results: A variant located in the intronic region of CORO1C on chromosome 12 (rs77395454; p value = 2.5E-08, beta = 1.27, SE = 0.23, risk allele: C) met genomewide significance for the penetrance model. Co-immunoprecipitation analyses of LRRK2 and CORO1C supported an interaction between these 2 proteins. A region on chromosome 3, within a previously reported linkage peak for Parkinson's disease susceptibility, showed suggestive associations in both models (penetrance top variant: p value = 1.1E-07; age-at-onset top variant: p value = 9.3E-07). A polygenic risk score derived from publicly available Parkinson's disease summary statistics was a significant predictor of penetrance, but not of age-at-onset. Interpretation: This study suggests that variants within or near CORO1C may modify the penetrance of LRRK2 mutations. In addition, common Parkinson's disease associated variants collectively increase the penetrance of LRRK2 mutations. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:82-94.Item International Genetic Testing and Counseling Practices for Parkinson's Disease(Wiley, 2023) Saunders-Pullman, Rachel; Raymond, Deborah; Ortega, Roberto A.; Shalash, Ali; Gatto, Emilia; Salari, Mehri; Markgraf, Maggie; Alcalay, Roy N.; Mascalzoni, Deborah; Mencacci, Niccolò E.; Bonifati, Vincenzo; Merello, Marcelo; Chung, Sun Ju; Novakovic, Ivana; Bardien, Soraya; Pal, Gian; Hall, Anne; Hattori, Nobutaka; Lynch, Timothy; Thaler, Avner; Sue, Carolyn M.; Foroud, Tatiana; Verbrugge, Jennifer; Schulze, Jeanine; Cook, Lola; Marder, Karen; Suchowersky, Oksana; Klein, Christine; Simuni, Tatyana; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineBackground: There is growing clinical and research utilization of genetic testing in Parkinson's disease (PD), including direct-to-consumer testing. Objectives: The aim is to determine the international landscape of genetic testing in PD to inform future worldwide recommendations. Methods: A web-based survey assessing current practices, concerns, and barriers to genetic testing and counseling was administered to the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society membership. Results: Common hurdles across sites included cost and access to genetic testing, and counseling, as well as education on genetic counseling. Region-dependent differences in access to and availability of testing and counseling were most notable in Africa. High-income countries also demonstrated heterogeneity, with European nations more likely to have genetic testing covered through insurance than Pan-American and Asian countries. Conclusions: This survey highlights not only diversity of barriers in different regions but also the shared and highly actionable needs for improved education and access to genetic counseling and testing for PD worldwide. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.Item Parkinson's disease biomarkers: perspective from the NINDS Parkinson's Disease Biomarkers Program(Future Medicine, 2017-05) Gwinn, Katrina; David, Karen K.; Swanson-Fischer, Christine; Albin, Roger; St Hillaire-Clarke, Coryse; Sieber, Beth-Anne; Lungu, Codrin; Bowman, F. DuBois; Alcalay, Roy N.; Babcock, Debra; Dawson, Ted M.; Dewey, Richard B., Jr.; Foroud, Tatiana; German, Dwight; Huang, Xuemei; Petyuk, Vlad; Potashkin, Judith A.; Saunders-Pullman, Rachel; Sutherland, Margaret; Walt, David R.; West, Andrew B.; Zhang, Jing; Chen-Plotkin, Alice; Scherzer, Clemens R.; Vaillancourt, David E.; Rosenthal, Liana S.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineBiomarkers for Parkinson's disease (PD) diagnosis, prognostication and clinical trial cohort selection are an urgent need. While many promising markers have been discovered through the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Parkinson's Disease Biomarker Program (PDBP) and other mechanisms, no single PD marker or set of markers are ready for clinical use. Here we discuss the current state of biomarker discovery for platforms relevant to PDBP. We discuss the role of the PDBP in PD biomarker identification and present guidelines to facilitate their development. These guidelines include: harmonizing procedures for biofluid acquisition and clinical assessments, replication of the most promising biomarkers, support and encouragement of publications that report negative findings, longitudinal follow-up of current cohorts including the PDBP, testing of wearable technologies to capture readouts between study visits and development of recently diagnosed (de novo) cohorts to foster identification of the earliest markers of disease onset.Item Relevance of genetic testing in the gene-targeted trial era: the Rostock Parkinson's disease study(Oxford University Press, 2024) Westenberger, Ana; Skrahina, Volha; Usnich, Tatiana; Beetz, Christian; Vollstedt, Eva-Juliane; Laabs, Björn-Hergen; Paul, Jefri J.; Curado, Filipa; Skobalj, Snezana; Gaber, Hanaa; Olmedillas, Maria; Bogdanovic, Xenia; Ameziane, Najim; Schell, Nathalie; Aasly, Jan Olav; Afshari, Mitra; Agarwal, Pinky; Aldred, Jason; Alonso-Frech, Fernando; Anderson, Roderick; Araújo, Rui; Arkadir, David; Avenali, Micol; Balal, Mehmet; Benizri, Sandra; Bette, Sagari; Bhatia, Perminder; Bonello, Michael; Braga-Neto, Pedro; Brauneis, Sarah; Costa Cardoso, Francisco Eduardo; Cavallieri, Francesco; Classen, Joseph; Cohen, Lisa; Coletta, Della; Crosiers, David; Cullufi, Paskal; Dashtipour, Khashayar; Demirkiran, Meltem; de Carvalho Aguiar, Patricia; De Rosa, Anna; Djaldetti, Ruth; Dogu, Okan; Dos Santos Ghilardi, Maria Gabriela; Eggers, Carsten; Elibol, Bulent; Ellenbogen, Aaron; Ertan, Sibel; Fabiani, Giorgio; Falkenburger, Björn H.; Farrow, Simon; Fay-Karmon, Tsviya; Ferencz, Gerald J.; Fonoff, Erich Talamoni; Fragoso, Yara Dadalti; Genç, Gençer; Gorospe, Arantza; Grandas, Francisco; Gruber, Doreen; Gudesblatt, Mark; Gurevich, Tanya; Hagenah, Johann; Hanagasi, Hasmet A.; Hassin-Baer, Sharon; Hauser, Robert A.; Hernández-Vara, Jorge; Herting, Birgit; Hinson, Vanessa K.; Hogg, Elliot; Hu, Michele T.; Hummelgen, Eduardo; Hussey, Kelly; Infante, Jon; Isaacson, Stuart H.; Jauma, Serge; Koleva-Alazeh, Natalia; Kuhlenbäumer, Gregor; Kühn, Andrea; Litvan, Irene; López-Manzanares, Lydia; Luxmore, McKenzie; Manandhar, Sujeena; Marcaud, Veronique; Markopoulou, Katerina; Marras, Connie; McKenzie, Mark; Matarazzo, Michele; Merello, Marcelo; Mollenhauer, Brit; Morgan, John C.; Mullin, Stephen; Musacchio, Thomas; Myers, Bennett; Negrotti, Anna; Nieves, Anette; Nitsan, Zeev; Oskooilar, Nader; Öztop-Çakmak, Özgür; Pal, Gian; Pavese, Nicola; Percesepe, Antonio; Piccoli, Tommaso; Pinto de Souza, Carolina; Prell, Tino; Pulera, Mark; Raw, Jason; Reetz, Kathrin; Reiner, Johnathan; Rosenberg, David; Ruiz-Lopez, Marta; Ruiz Martinez, Javier; Sammler, Esther; Santos-Lobato, Bruno Lopes; Saunders-Pullman, Rachel; Schlesinger, Ilana; Schofield, Christine M.; Schumacher-Schuh, Artur F.; Scott, Burton; Sesar, Ángel; Shafer, Stuart J.; Sheridan, Ray; Silverdale, Monty; Sophia, Rani; Spitz, Mariana; Stathis, Pantelis; Stocchi, Fabrizio; Tagliati, Michele; Tai, Yen F.; Terwecoren, Annelies; Thonke, Sven; Tönges, Lars; Toschi, Giulia; Tumas, Vitor; Urban, Peter Paul; Vacca, Laura; Vandenberghe, Wim; Valente, Enza Maria; Valzania, Franco; Vela-Desojo, Lydia; Weill, Caroline; Weise, David; Wojcieszek, Joanne; Wolz, Martin; Yahalom, Gilad; Yalcin-Cakmakli, Gul; Zittel, Simone; Zlotnik, Yair; Kandaswamy, Krishna K.; Balck, Alexander; Hanssen, Henrike; Borsche, Max; Lange, Lara M.; Csoti, Ilona; Lohmann, Katja; Kasten, Meike; Brüggemann, Norbert; Rolfs, Arndt; Klein, Christine; Bauer, Peter; Neurology, School of MedicineEstimates of the spectrum and frequency of pathogenic variants in Parkinson's disease (PD) in different populations are currently limited and biased. Furthermore, although therapeutic modification of several genetic targets has reached the clinical trial stage, a major obstacle in conducting these trials is that PD patients are largely unaware of their genetic status and, therefore, cannot be recruited. Expanding the number of investigated PD-related genes and including genes related to disorders with overlapping clinical features in large, well-phenotyped PD patient groups is a prerequisite for capturing the full variant spectrum underlying PD and for stratifying and prioritizing patients for gene-targeted clinical trials. The Rostock Parkinson's disease (ROPAD) study is an observational clinical study aiming to determine the frequency and spectrum of genetic variants contributing to PD in a large international cohort. We investigated variants in 50 genes with either an established relevance for PD or possible phenotypic overlap in a group of 12 580 PD patients from 16 countries [62.3% male; 92.0% White; 27.0% positive family history (FH+), median age at onset (AAO) 59 years] using a next-generation sequencing panel. Altogether, in 1864 (14.8%) ROPAD participants (58.1% male; 91.0% White, 35.5% FH+, median AAO 55 years), a PD-relevant genetic test (PDGT) was positive based on GBA1 risk variants (10.4%) or pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in LRRK2 (2.9%), PRKN (0.9%), SNCA (0.2%) or PINK1 (0.1%) or a combination of two genetic findings in two genes (∼0.2%). Of note, the adjusted positive PDGT fraction, i.e. the fraction of positive PDGTs per country weighted by the fraction of the population of the world that they represent, was 14.5%. Positive PDGTs were identified in 19.9% of patients with an AAO ≤ 50 years, in 19.5% of patients with FH+ and in 26.9% with an AAO ≤ 50 years and FH+. In comparison to the idiopathic PD group (6846 patients with benign variants), the positive PDGT group had a significantly lower AAO (4 years, P = 9 × 10-34). The probability of a positive PDGT decreased by 3% with every additional AAO year (P = 1 × 10-35). Female patients were 22% more likely to have a positive PDGT (P = 3 × 10-4), and for individuals with FH+ this likelihood was 55% higher (P = 1 × 10-14). About 0.8% of the ROPAD participants had positive genetic testing findings in parkinsonism-, dystonia/dyskinesia- or dementia-related genes. In the emerging era of gene-targeted PD clinical trials, our finding that ∼15% of patients harbour potentially actionable genetic variants offers an important prospect to affected individuals and their families and underlines the need for genetic testing in PD patients. Thus, the insights from the ROPAD study allow for data-driven, differential genetic counselling across the spectrum of different AAOs and family histories and promote a possible policy change in the application of genetic testing as a routine part of patient evaluation and care in PD.Item The Commercial Genetic Testing Landscape for Parkinson’s Disease(Elsevier, 2021) Cook, Lola; Schulze, Jeanine; Verbrugge, Jennifer; Beck, James C.; Marder, Karen S.; Saunders-Pullman, Rachel; Klein, Christine; Naito, Anna; Alcalay, Roy N.; ClinGen Parkinson’s Disease Gene Curation Expert Panel; MDS Task Force for Recommendations for Genetic Testing in Parkinson’s Disease; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineIntroduction: There have been no specific guidelines regarding which genes should be tested in the clinical setting for Parkinson's disease (PD) or parkinsonism. We evaluated the types of clinical genetic testing offered for PD as the first step of our gene curation. Methods: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Genetic Testing Registry (GTR) was queried on 12/7/2020 to identify current commercial PD genetic test offerings by clinical laboratories, internationally. Results: We identified 502 unique clinical genetic tests for PD, from 28 Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-approved clinical laboratories. These included 11 diagnostic PD panels. The panels were notable for their differences in size, ranging from 5 to 62 genes. Five genes for variant query were included in all panels (SNCA, PRKN, PINK-1, PARK7 (DJ1), and LRRK2). Notably, the addition of the VPS35 and GBA genes was variable. Panel size differences stemmed from inclusion of genes linked to atypical parkinsonism and dystonia disorders, and genes in which the link to PD causation is controversial. Conclusion: There is an urgent need for expert opinion regarding which genes should be included in a commercial laboratory multi-gene panel for PD.