- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Robertson, Michael J."
Now showing 1 - 10 of 13
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Acquired STAT4 deficiency as a consequence of cancer chemotherapy(2011-08-16) Lupov, Ivan; Chang, Hua-Chen; Randall, Stephen Karl, 1953-; Robertson, Michael J.Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 4 (STAT4) is an important transcription factor activated by IL-12 signaling. Activated STAT4 is essential for Th1 cell differentiation, a process characterized by increased potential for interferon (IFN)-γ production. Defective IFN-γ production due to STAT4 deficiency occurs after autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma. We have investigated the mechanisms of post-transplant STAT4 deficiency. The tumor-bearing state is ruled out to be the cause because STAT4 levels were not significantly different in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from lymphoma patients prior to treatment and healthy control subjects. The magnitude of the decrease in STAT4 levels corresponded with increasing intensity of chemotherapeutic treatment in vivo. Furthermore, treatment of normal PBMC cultures or a natural killer (NK) cell line with chemotherapy drugs in vitro also resulted in reduced STAT4 protein and reduced IL-12-induced IFN-γ production. Chemotherapy drugs are shown to have no impact on the stability of STAT4 mRNA, while steady-state levels of STAT4 transcripts are decreased in lymphoma patients. Our findings demonstrated that chemotherapeutic drugs up-regulate the ubiquitination rates of the STAT4 protein, which in turn promotes its degradation via the proteasome-mediated pathway. Treatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib largely reversed the chemotherapy-induced STAT4 deficiency. Thus, acquired STAT4 deficiency in lymphoma patients is a consequence of treatment with chemotherapy. These results have important implications for design of optimal immunotherapy for lymphoma.Item Cognitive and Situational Precipitants of Loneliness Among Patients With Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis(Oncology Nursing Society, 2016-03) Adams, Rebecca N.; Mosher, Catherine E.; Abonour, Rafat; Robertson, Michael J.; Champion, Victoria L.; Kroenke, Kurt; Department of Psychology, School of SciencePURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To identify situations and thoughts that may precipitate or protect against loneliness experienced by patients with cancer. RESEARCH APPROACH: Qualitative. SETTING: The hematology/oncology clinic at the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, an outpatient oncology center in Indianapolis. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 15 patients undergoing treatment for multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Individual, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted. Theoretical thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. FINDINGS: Factors that appeared to precipitate loneliness included several situations (e.g., physical isolation, social constraints such as criticism) and thoughts (e.g., unmet expectations for visits or questions about health, belief that others do not understand their cancer experience). Several situations (e.g., social support, normal routine) and thoughts (e.g., beliefs that time alone is desirable and that others' discomfort with cancer-related discussions is normative) appeared to protect against loneliness. Certain social situations were loneliness-inducing for some patients and not for others, suggesting that patients' thoughts about their situations, rather than the situations themselves, have the greatest impact on their loneliness. CONCLUSIONS: The current study fills gaps in loneliness theory by identifying cancer-related situations and thoughts that patients associate with their loneliness. Consistent with theory, patients reported feeling lonely when they had negative thoughts about their social situations. INTERPRETATION: Findings inform nursing assessment and intervention strategies to incorporate into care plans. For instance, when conducting assessments, nurses should be more attentive to patients' satisfaction with their social environment than actual characteristics of the environment. Normalizing patients' experiences and encouraging positive thoughts about others' behavior may reduce patients' loneliness.Item Current and emerging monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific antibodies in treatment of lymphoma(Elsevier, 2022-04-28) Atallah-Yunes, Suheil Albert; Robertson, Michael J.; Medicine, School of MedicineThe improvement in outcomes seen with the introduction of rituximab, a CD20 monoclonal antibody in combination with chemotherapy or as a single agent in the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas has paved the way for development of various forms of monoclonal antibodies that act in different ways against non-Hodgkin lymphoma tumor cells. These could directly target a single surface antigen resulting in various ways of tumor cells toxicity and killing. Other forms of monoclonal antibodies include antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies. The role of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of lymphoma will be reviewed, highlighting their mode of action, clinical efficacy, and side effects.Item Cytokine Based Immunotherapy for Cancer and Lymphoma: Biology, Challenges and Future Perspectives(Frontiers Media, 2022-04-20) Atallah-Yunes, Suheil Albert; Robertson, Michael J.; Medicine, School of MedicineCytokines regulate both the innate and adaptive immune responses to cancer. Although antitumor activity has been seen for several cytokines in preclinical models, they have had limited success as single therapeutic agents in clinical trials of cancer immunotherapy. However, the possible combinations of cytokines with other immune therapeutics and the advancement in genetic engineering, synthetic biology and cellular and immune therapy has led to the revival of interest in cytokines as anticancer agents. This article will review several immunostimulatory cytokines with anticancer activity, focusing on the those that have been studied in treatment of lymphoma and highlighting recent advances of potential clinical relevance.Item Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibition for Prophylaxis of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease(Massachusetts Medical Society, 2021-01-07) Farag, Sherif S.; Zaid, Mohammad Abu; Schwartz, Jennifer E.; Thakrar, Teresa C.; Blakley, Ann J.; Abonour, Rafat; Robertson, Michael J.; Broxmeyer, Hal E.; Zhang, Shuhong; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4; also known as CD26), a transmembrane receptor expressed on T cells, has a costimulatory function in activating T cells. In a mouse model, down-regulation of CD26 prevented graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but preserved graft-versus-tumor effects. Whether inhibition of DPP-4 with sitagliptin may prevent acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is not known. Methods: We conducted a two-stage, phase 2 clinical trial to test whether sitagliptin plus tacrolimus and sirolimus would reduce the incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD from 30% to no more than 15% by day 100. Patients received myeloablative conditioning followed by mobilized peripheral-blood stem-cell transplants. Sitagliptin was given orally at a dose of 600 mg every 12 hours starting the day before transplantation until day 14 after transplantation. Results: A total of 36 patients who could be evaluated, with a median age of 46 years (range, 20 to 59), received transplants from matched related or unrelated donors. Acute GVHD occurred in 2 of 36 patients by day 100; the incidence of grade II to IV GVHD was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1 to 16), and the incidence of grade III or IV GVHD was 3% (95% CI, 0 to 12). Nonrelapse mortality was zero at 1 year. The 1-year cumulative incidences of relapse and chronic GVHD were 26% (95% CI, 13 to 41) and 37% (95% CI, 22 to 53), respectively. GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 46% (95% CI, 29 to 62) at 1 year. Toxic effects were similar to those seen in patients undergoing allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Conclusions: In this nonrandomized trial, sitagliptin in combination with tacrolimus and sirolimus resulted in a low incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD by day 100 after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.Item A Dose-escalation Study of Recombinant Human Interleukin-18 in Combination With Ofatumumab After Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma(Wolters Kluwer, 2018-04) Robertson, Michael J.; Stamatkin, Christopher W.; Pelloso, David; Weisenbach, Jill; Prasad, Nagendra K.; Safa, Ahmad R.; Medicine, School of MedicineInterleukin-18 (IL-18) is an immunostimulatory cytokine that augments antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity mediated by human natural killer cells against antibody-coated lymphoma cells in vitro and that has antitumor activity in animal models. Ofatumumab is a CD20 monoclonal antibody with activity against human B-cell lymphomas. A phase I study of recombinant human (rh) IL-18 given with ofatumumab was undertaken in patients with CD20 lymphoma who had undergone high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Cohorts of 3 patients were given intravenous infusions of ofatumumab 1000 mg weekly for 4 weeks with escalating doses of rhIL-18 as a intravenous infusion weekly for 8 consecutive weeks. Nine male patients with CD20 lymphomas were given ofatumumab in combination with rhIL-18 at doses of 3, 10, and 30 μg/kg. No unexpected or dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The mean reduction from predose levels in the number of peripheral blood natural killer cells after the first rhIL-18 infusion was 91%, 96%, and 97% for the 3, 10, and 30 μg/kg cohorts, respectively. Serum concentrations of interferon-γ and chemokines transiently increased following IL-18 dosing. rhIL-18 can be given in biologically active doses by weekly infusions in combination with ofatumumab after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation to patients with lymphoma. A maximum tolerated dose of rhIL-18 plus ofatumumab was not determined. Further studies of rhIL-18 and CD20 monoclonal antibodies in B-cell malignancies are warranted.Item A Dose-Escalation Study of Recombinant Human Interleukin-18 Using Two Different Schedules of Administration in Patients with Cancer(American Association for Cancer Research, 2008-06) Robertson, Michael J.; Kirkwood, John M.; Logan, Theodore F.; Koch, Kevin M.; Kathman, Steven; Kirby, Lyndon C.; Bell, William N.; Thurmond, Linda M.; Weisenbach, Jill; Dar, Mohammed M.; Medicine, School of MedicinePurpose: Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is an immunostimulatory cytokine with antitumor activity in preclinical models. A phase I study of recombinant human IL-18 (rhIL-18) was done to determine the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and biological activities of rhIL-18 administered at different doses in two different schedules to patients with advanced cancer. Experimental design: Cohorts of three to four patients were given escalating doses of rhIL-18 as a 2-h i.v. infusion either on 5 consecutive days repeated every 28 days (group A) or once a week (group B) for up to 6 months. Toxicities were graded using standard criteria. Blood samples were obtained for safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic measurements. Results: Nineteen patients (10 melanoma and 9 renal cell cancer) were given rhIL-18 in doses of 100, 500, or 1,000 microg/kg (group A) or 100, 1,000, or 2,000 microg/kg (group B). Common side effects included chills, fever, headache, fatigue, and nausea. Common laboratory abnormalities included transient, asymptomatic grade 1 to 3 lymphopenia, grade 1 to 4 hyperglycemia, grade 1 to 2 anemia, neutropenia, hypoalbuminemia, liver enzyme elevations, and serum creatinine elevations. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Biological effects of rhIL-18 included transient lymphopenia and increased expression of activation antigens on lymphocytes. Increases in serum concentrations of IFN-gamma, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and IL-18-binding protein were observed following dosing. Conclusions: rhIL-18 can be given in biologically active doses by either weekly infusions or daily infusions for 5 days repeated every 28 days to patients with advanced cancer. Toxicity was generally mild to moderate, and a maximum tolerated dose of rhIL-18 by either schedule was not determined.Item Enhancement of Cancer Immunotherapy Using Immune Modulating Peptides(Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, 2013-04-05) Chang, Hua-Chen; Han, Ling; Lewis, David; Tung, Chun-Yu; Srinivasan, Mythily; Robertson, Michael J.; Yeh, Wu-KuangImmune Peptide Therapeutics (IPT) LLC, an Indiana-based small business and its research partner Indiana University previously identified a novel property of lunasin as a distinct class of immune modulating agent that enhances anti-tumor immunity, which may promote disease-free survival by limiting tumor progression, and thus prolong lives of cancer patients. Lunasin, a synthetic 43-amino acid peptide, was originally isolated from soybeans. Our studies have demonstrated that lunasin exerts robust synergistic effects with cytokines on augmenting IFNγ and granzyme B expression by Natural Killer (NK) cells, which is associated with increased tumoricidal activity of NK cells. In addition, this combination regimen is capable of rescuing IFNγ production ex vivo by NK cells from chemotherapy-treated Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) patients who are immunocompromised with acquired immune deficiency. The long-term goal is to develop an efficacious immunotherapy which will impact the treatment and improve the clinical outcomes for NHL patients. The dose-response study indicates the optimum concentration of lunasin is at the range of μM, which would undermine its use in clinical studies. To enhance the medicinal value lunasin must be optimized for in vitro and in vivo efficacy. The objective is to develop a second generation of lunasin, which will increase its potency to improve the performance. In this study we have implemented several strategies to design and modify the prototype. The newly developed peptide called IPT.103 has 15 amino acids that are in the D-isoform configuration. Activity of IPT.103 has been tested in vitro with EC50 of 0.78 μM as compared to 4.54 μM for lunasin. IPT.103 also has in vivo activity on enhancing the serum levels of IFNγ production using a mouse model. Taken together, we have developed a peptide derivative (IPT.103) that deviates from its parental type lunasin to increase intellectual merit for commercialization as well as support clinical application.Item Ipilimumab, Nivolumab and Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma: Phase 1 Results of a Multicenter Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial(Elsevier, 2020-09) Diefenbach, Catherine S.; Hong, Fangxin; Ambinder, Richard F.; Cohen, Jonathon B.; Robertson, Michael J.; David, Kevin A.; Advani, Ranjana H.; Fenske, Timothy S.; Barta, Stefan K.; Palmisiano, Neil D.; Svoboda, Jakub; Morgan, David S.; Karmali, Reem; Sharon, Elad; Streicher, Howard; Kahl, Brad S.; Ansell, Stephen M.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Recognising that the immune suppressive microenvironment promotes tumour growth in Hodgkin lymphoma, we hypothesised that activating immunity might augment the activity of targeted chemotherapy. We evaluated the safety and activity of combinations of brentuximab vedotin with nivolumab or ipilimumab, or both in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma aged 18 years or older who had relapsed after at least one line of therapy, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, and adequate organ and marrow function, with no pulmonary dysfunction were eligible for inclusion. Phase 1 primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicities of brentuximab vedotin combined with ipilimumab (ipilimumab group), nivolumab (nivolumab group), or both (triplet therapy group) using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design with expansion cohorts. During the dose escalation phase, patients were enrolled sequentially into one of six cohorts: in the ipilimumab group fixed brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (cohort A) or 3 mg/kg (cohort B); in the nivolumab group fixed nivolumab 3 mg/kg with brentuximab vedotin 1·2 mg/kg (cohort D) or 1·8 mg/kg (cohort E); and in the triplet therapy group fixed nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg with brentuximab vedotin 1·2 mg/kg (cohort G) or 1·8 mg/kg (cohort H). Additional patients were enrolled in the expansion phase at the same doses of cohorts B, E, and H. All drugs were given intravenously; brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab were given every 3 weeks, ipilimumab was given every 6 weeks in the ipilimumab group and every 12 weeks in the triplet therapy group. All eligible and treated patients were included in the analysis. This phase 1/2 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01896999. The phase 2, randomised portion of the trial is still enrolling. Findings: Between March 7, 2014, and Dec 28, 2017, 64 patients were enrolled; two patients in the ipilimumab group and one patient in the nivolumab group were excluded due to ineligibility after enrolment and 61 were evaluable. A total of six dose limiting toxicities were reported in four patients, and the doses used in cohorts B, E, and H were established as maximum tolerated doses and patients were subsequently enrolled onto expansion cohorts (C, F, and I) with these schedules. There were ten (43%) grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events in the ipilimumab group, three (16%) in the nivolumab group, and 11 (50%) in the triplet therapy group including: eight (13%) of 64 patients reporting rash, and colitis, gastritis, pancreatitis and arthritis, and diabetic ketoacidosis each occurring in one (2%) patient. There were two (3%) treatment related deaths, one in the nivolumab group and one in the triplet therapy group. The overall response rate was 76% (95% CI 53-92) in the ipilimumab group, 89% (65-99) in the nivolumab group, and 82% (60-95) in the triplet therapy group, and the complete response rate was 57% (95% CI 34-78%) in the ipilimumab group, 61% (36-83%) in the nivolumab group, and 73% (50-89%) in the triplet therapy group. With a median follow-up of 2·6 years (IQR 1·8-2·9) in the ipilimumab group, 2·4 years (2·2-2·6) in the nivolumab group, and 1·7 years (1·6-1·9) in the triplet therapy group, median progression-free survival is 1·2 years (95% CI 1·7-not reached) in the ipilimumab group, but was not reached in the other two treatment groups. Median overall survival has not been reached in any of the groups. Interpretation: There are clear differences in activity and toxicity of the three combination regimens. The tolerability and preliminary activity for the two most active regimens, brentuximab vedotin with nivolumab and the triplet therapy, are being compared in a randomised phase 2 trial (NCT01896999).Item Low CD34+ Cell Doses Are Associated with Increased Cost and Worse Outcome after Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Germ Cell Tumors(Elsevier, 2018) Hyder, Mustafa A.; Goebel, W. Scott; Ervin, Kirsten D.; Schwartz, Jennifer E.; Robertson, Michael J.; Thakrar, Teresa C.; Albany, Costantine; Farag, Sherif S.; Medicine, School of MedicineTandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves long-term survival of platinum-refractory germ cell tumor (GCT) patients. Studies, predominantly in lymphoma, showed that CD34+ cell doses > 5.0 × 106/kg/single transplant led to decreased resource utilization. Because most GCT patients have received prior cisplatin-based treatment, collecting >10 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg is challenging. We analyzed the effect of CD34+ cell dose on resource utilization and outcome in 131 GCT patients, median age 29.5 years (range, 16 to 58), undergoing tandem ASCT. Of 262 individual transplants performed, 120 were performed as inpatient and 142 as planned outpatient. Overall, median CD34+ dose per transplant was 3.1 × 106/kg (range, .8 to 16.0), with no significant difference between inpatient and outpatient transplants. Patients were divided into quartiles based on the CD34 cell dose infused: Q1, .8 to 1.9 × 106/kg; Q2, 2.0 to 2.9 × 106/kg; Q3, 3.0 to 4.1 × 106/kg; and Q4, 4.2 to 16.0 × 106/kg. For all patients higher CD34+ cell doses were associated with significantly shorter times to neutrophil (P <.001) and platelet recovery (P <.001). For inpatient transplants higher CD34+ doses were significantly associated with shorter length of hospital stay (P <.001); fewer days of filgrastim (P <.001), i.v. antibiotic (P = .012), and antifungal (P = .03) usage; and fewer RBC (P = .001) and platelet units transfused (P <.001), resulting in overall lower cost of care (P < .001). Of the 142 planned outpatient transplants, 100 admissions were required for a median length of hospital stay of 7.0 days (range, 1 to 18). Although there was no significant difference in the rates of hospitalization between patients in different CD34+ cell dose quartiles, a significant trend was observed for shorter hospitalization (P = .01) and fewer RBC (P = .002) and platelet (P = .005) transfusions with higher CD34+ cell dose quartiles. Patients receiving CD34+ cell doses in the lowest dose quartile (Q1) had significantly worse progression-free survival and overall survival compared with patients receiving higher CD34+ cell doses. Overall, resource utilization, including cost of care, is significantly reduced when patients receive higher CD34+ cell doses, indicating greater efforts to improve peripheral blood stem cell collection in this population are needed.