Browsing by Author "Rizzo, Alessandro"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: is it the right strategy to inhibit VEGF?
    (AME Publishing, 2021-03) Mollica, Veronica; Rizzo, Alessandro; Di Nunno, Vincenzo; Santoni, Matteo; Cheng, Liang; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio; Scarpelli, Marina; Cimadamore, Alessia; Montironi, Rodolfo; Massari, Francesco; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Despite several clinical trials have assessed different agents in the adjuvant setting, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) still remains a disease orphan of an effective adjuvant treatment. In fact, systemic therapies targeting angiogenesis that have been observed to be effective in metastatic setting failed to show an improvement in terms of clinical outcomes when used ad adjuvant treatments. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis of 5 randomized clinical trials to assess the impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting angiogenesis after surgery: ASSURE, S-TRAC, PROTECT, ATLAS, SORCE. Among the 6,531 patients assessed, we confirmed the lack of efficacy of adjuvant treatments in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (pooled-HR 0.93, 95% CI, 0.84–1.02, P=0.16) and overall survival (OS) (pooled-HR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.88–1.09, P=0.54). To the best of our knowledge, we still ignore why some treatments active in the metastatic setting do not show similar efficacy as adjuvant treatment. Exploring possible reasons of this apparently conflicting results is important as it may offer new insights that should be evaluated in next generation adjuvant trials. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reported significant results—as monotherapy or in combinations with other anticancer agents—in metastatic setting, and the results of trials evaluating these agents in the adjuvant setting are awaited.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Current Strategies and Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
    (MDPI, 2020-06-02) Mollica, Veronica; Rizzo, Alessandro; Montironi, Rodolfo; Cheng, Liang; Giunchi, Francesca; Schiavina, Riccardo; Santoni, Matteo; Fiorentino, Michelangelo; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio; Brunocilla, Eugenio; Brandi, Giovanni; Massari, Francesco; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a frequent cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Metastatic UC has been historically associated with poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of approximately 15 months and a 5-year survival rate of 18%. Although platinum-based chemotherapy remains the mainstay of medical treatment for patients with metastatic UC, chemotherapy clinical trials produced modest benefit with short-lived, disappointing responses. In recent years, the better understanding of the role of immune system in cancer control has led to the development and approval of several immunotherapeutic approaches in UC therapy, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have been revolutionizing the treatment of metastatic UC. Because of a better tumor molecular profiling, FGFR inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, anti-HER2 agents, and antibody drug conjugates targeting Nectin-4 are also emerging as new therapeutic options. Moreover, a wide number of trials is ongoing with the aim to evaluate several other alterations and pathways as new potential targets in metastatic UC. In this review, we will discuss the recent advances and highlight future directions of the medical treatment of UC, with a particular focus on recently published data and ongoing active and recruiting trials.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Is There a Role for Immunotherapy in Prostate Cancer?
    (MDPI, 2020-09-08) Rizzo, Alessandro; Mollica, Veronica; Cimadamore, Alessia; Santoni, Matteo; Scarpelli, Marina; Giunchi, Francesca; Cheng, Liang; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio; Fiorentino, Michelangelo; Montironi, Rodolfo; Massari, Francesco; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    In the last decade, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of several hematological and solid malignancies, reporting unprecedented response rates. Unfortunately, this is not the case for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), as several phase I and II trials assessing programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors have shown limited benefits. Moreover, despite sipuleucel-T representing the only cancer vaccine approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for mCRPC following the results of the IMPACT trial, the use of this agent is relatively limited in everyday clinical practice. The identification of specific histological and molecular biomarkers that could predict response to immunotherapy represents one of the current challenges, with an aim to detect subgroups of mCRPC patients who may benefit from immune checkpoint monoclonal antibodies as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents. Several unanswered questions remain, including the following: is there—or will there ever be—a role for immunotherapy in prostate cancer? In this review, we aim at underlining the failures and promises of immunotherapy in prostate cancer, summarizing the current state of art regarding cancer vaccines and immune checkpoint monoclonal antibodies, and discussing future research directions in this immunologically “cold” malignancy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    TNM staging towards a personalized approach in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: what will the future be like?—a narrative review
    (AME Publishing, 2021-03) Rizzo, Alessandro; Mollica, Veronica; Cimadamore, Alessia; Santoni, Matteo; Scarpelli, Marina; Schiavina, Riccardo; Cheng, Liang; Lopez-Beltran, Antonio; Brunocilla, Eugenio; Montironi, Rodolfo; Massari, Francesco; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine
    The American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, with its periodical updates and modifications, has represented and still represents the basis of cancer staging. The historical, long-standing limitations of anatomic-based TNM staging have been recently “threatened” by the impressive amount of data derived from molecular analyses, which have led to an unprecedented level of understanding of cancer genomics. In fact, current era of personalized oncology has witnessed important efforts towards the integration between clinical, anatomical and molecular features; however, despite the promises, personalized oncology faces many obstacles, due to the complex relationship between tumor biomarkers, previously unknown cancer subtypes and clinical and anatomical characteristics. With regard to urothelial carcinoma (UC), the characterization of tumors in large cohorts of patients has provided important information concerning genetic alterations, revealing the presence of biologically relevant subtypes of UC. In the current review, we will provide an overview regarding this recent “translation” from the anatomic-based TNM to a novel horizon, aiming at further “tailoring” personalized oncology, especially focusing on recently published data about the molecular landscape of UC with its therapeutic and prognostic implications.