- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Ralston, Rick K."
Now showing 1 - 10 of 16
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Context and characteristics of the research metrics librarian(2019-10-25) Craven, Hannah J.; Grooten, Todd M.; Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Ralston, Rick K.; Odell, Jere D.Item Data visualization for truth maintenance in clinical decision support systems(2015-06-19) Liu, Gilbert C.; Odell, Jere D.; Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Ralston, Rick K.; Carroll, Aaron E.; Downs, Stephen M.Background and objectives The goal is to inform proactive initiatives to expand the knowledge base of clinical decision support systems. Design and setting We describe an initiative in which research informationists and health services researchers employ visualization tools to map logic models for clinical decision support within an electronic health record. Materials and methods We mapped relationships using software for social network analysis: NodeXL and CMAP. We defined relationships by shared observations, such as two Arden rules within medical logic modules that consider the same clinical observation, or by the presence of common keywords that were used to label rules according to standardized vocabularies. Results We studied the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, an electronic medical record that contains 170 unique variables representing discrete clinical observations. These variables were used in 300 medical logic modules (MLM's) that prompted health care providers to deliver preventive counseling or otherwise served as clinical decision support. Using data visualization tools, we generated maps that illustrate connections, or lack thereof, between clinical topics within CHICA's MLMs. Conclusions The development of such maps may allow multiple disciplines commonly interacting over EMR platforms, and various perspectives (clinicians, programmers, informationists) to work more effectively as teams to refine the EMR by programming logic routines to address co-morbidities or other instances where domains of medical knowledge should be connected.Item Do local citation patterns support use of the impact factor for collection development?(Medical Library Association, 2008-10) Ralston, Rick K.; Gall, Carole; Brahmi, Frances A.Item Enhancing research on a clinical decision support and geographic information system: getting involved as informationists(Midwest Chapter, Medical Library Association, 2013-10-07) Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Ralston, Rick K.; Odell, Jere D.; Zimmerman, Carly; Liu, Gilbert C.In 2012, the National Library of Medicine (NLM) funded its first ever administrative supplement for informationists. The purpose of these grants is to enhance multidisciplinary basic and clinical research by integrating information specialists (informationists) on research teams in order to improve the capture, organization, and management of biomedical research data. Three informationists at the Indiana University School of Medicine were awarded one of these supplements to work on the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system. CHICA is a computer decision support system that interfaces with existing electronic medical record systems (EMRS) and delivers "just in time" patient-relevant guidelines to physicians during the clinical encounter. CHICA-GIS integrates a geographic information system (GIS) with CHICA to refer pediatricians and parents to relevant health services (as needed, for physical activity, dental care, or tutoring) near the patient's neighborhood. The informationists are enhancing the CHICA-GIS system by: improving the accuracy and accessibility of information, managing and mapping the knowledge which undergirds the CHICA-GIS decision support tool, supporting community engagement and consumer health information outreach, and facilitating the dissemination of new CHICA-GIS research results and services. This paper describes the initial process for approaching and collaborating with researchers, writing the grant and getting funded, and progress on the project goals to date.Item Exploring the publishing patterns and journal use of Graduate Medical Education (GME) residents in a large medical school(Midwest Chapter of the Medical Library Association, 2023-10-13) Ralston, Rick K.; Stumpff, Julia C.; Ramirez, MirianOBJECTIVE: Graduate Medical Education residents are often encouraged or required to publish their scholarship, and librarians are asked for assistance during that process. We investigated the publication patterns of residents and the journals they cite in their publications. This knowledge will help librarians better instruct residents and inform collection development efforts that support resident publishing. METHODS: Residents who completed their training between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019, were searched in Scopus. Included in this analysis were case studies/series, original research, or review articles authored by residents affiliated with our institution and published from one year after the trainee start date to 18 months after the trainee termination date. The analysis included journals in which residents published, number of publications, number of residents publishing, number of citations per publication, distribution of publishing among programs, journals cited within publications, months from start date to first publication, and subject area impact of journals in which residents published. RESULTS: Of 266 residents analyzed, 34% published at least one article. The 291 articles included in the study appeared in 188 different journals. The surgery department had the most publications and citations. Urology and Otolaryngology tied for most publications per resident with 8.33. Otolaryngology had the most citations per resident with 110.7. The top 20 journals cited in resident publications were cited 50 times or more. The median time to publication of residents' first article was 38.6 months. 48% of journals in which residents published ranked in the top 50% of their category by JIF. CONCLUSIONS: GME residents publish in a wide variety of journals, and almost half of residents' articles are published in high-impact journals (Q1 & Q2) in their subject area. A majority of residents published between 2-4 years after their start date. Libraries might provide guidance about publishing original research to support their scholarly publishing. Further, libraries can evaluate if their collections meet their residents’ research needs by examining journals cited in residents’ publications.Item Exploring the publishing patterns and journal use of Graduate Medical Education (GME) residents in a large medical school.(2023-05-19) Stumpff, Julia C.; Ramirez, Mirian; Ralston, Rick K.OBJECTIVE: Graduate Medical Education (GME) residents are required to meet ACGME-mandated scholarship requirements.(1) Often those residents are encouraged to publish the resulting scholarship, and librarians are asked for assistance during that process. We will investigate two things: the publication patterns of residents and the journals they cite in their publications. By examining publication patterns, we will learn which types of articles residents typically author, in which departments trainees publish, etc. This knowledge will help librarians better target guidance provided to residents. Likewise, the analysis of the cited journals will inform collection development efforts that support resident publishing. METHODS: This is a descriptive ‘baseline’ exploratory study. 266 residents who completed their training between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019, were searched in Scopus. Included in this analysis are case study/case series, original research, or review articles authored by residents and with our institution listed by any author. Articles were limited to publication dates that were one year after the trainee start date and 18 months after the trainee termination date. Excluded were published curriculum, editorials, conference papers, and conference posters. Articles were coded separately by two different authors (case study/case series, original research, or review articles). When there were disagreements, a third author made the final decision. The analysis included journals in which GME residents published, number of publications, number of residents publishing, number of publications cited, distribution of publishing among programs, and journals cited within publications. RESULTS: Out of the residents matriculating 2018-19, 34% published at least one article, and they published in 188 different journals. 291 total articles were published by residents, and of those articles, the majority, 60%, were original research. 41% of first authors were GME residents. Of resident program areas, Surgery had the highest number of publications and citations. When analyzing publications per resident, Urology and Otolaryngology tied for first with 8.33. Otolaryngology had the most citations per resident with 110.7. There were 8073 cited references in 2288 journals. The top 20 journals were cited more than 50 times. CONCLUSIONS: GME residents publish in a wide variety of journals. Libraries might provide guidance about publishing original research to support their scholarly publishing. Further, libraries can evaluate if their collections meet their residents’ research needs by examining journals cited in residents’ publications. The limitations of this study are that the analysis included one institution and one year of matriculating residents. Also, inter-program comparisons did not account for differing time-in-residency. Next steps are to analyze the inter-program data by time-in-residency, use the Chi-Squared test to look for relationships, and analyze journal data by program area. Eventually, other GME trainees’ publications will be analyzed. The analysis will then expand to trainees from multiple years for a more complete picture of GME trainee publishing. 1. Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Common Program Requirements (Residency). July 1, 2022. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/cprresidency_2022v3.pdfItem Getting off obesity island: how informationists can enhance clinical decision support(Medical Library Association, 2014-05-19) Odell, Jere D.; Ralston, Rick K.; Whipple, Elizabeth C.Clinical decision support (CDS) will play a key role in improving the health of patients; informationists can support the development of CDS systems by indexing rule libraries and mapping the system logic. This work can help rule developers make more informed choices and understand how rules are related conceptually and operationally. With a map, rules can be written to bridge isolated concepts (islands) and rules that are no longer needed can be weeded. Here we explore the added value that informationists bring to projects by reporting on the role of informationists working on a pediatric CDS.Item Identifying Inconsistencies and Reporting Deficits in Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork (TMB) Case Reports Authored by TMB Practitioners: a TMB-Adapted CAse REport (CARE) Guidelines Audit Through 2014(2016-09) Munk, Niki; Shue, Sarah; Freeland, Emilee; Ralston, Rick K.; Boulanger, Karen T.; Department of Health Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesIntroduction: Case reports are a fundamental tool through which therapeutic massage and bodywork (TMB) practitioners can inform research and impact their field by detailing the presentation, treatment, and follow-up of a single individual encountered in practice. Inconsistencies in case reporting limit their impact as fundamental sources of clinical evidence. Using the TMB-adapted CAse REport (CARE) guidelines, the current study sought to provide a rich description regarding the reporting quality of TMB practitioner authored TMB case reports in the literature. Methods: 1) Systematic identification of published, peer-reviewed TMB case reports authored by TMB practitioners following PRISMA recommendations; 2) audit development based on TMB-adapted CARE guidelines; 3) audit implementation; and 4) descriptive analysis of audit scores. Results: Our search identified 977 articles and 35 met study inclusion criteria. On average, TMB case reports included approximately 58% of the total items identified as necessary by the TMB-adapted CARE guidelines. Introduction sections of case reports had the best item reporting (80% on average), while Case Presentation (54%) and Results (52%) sections scored moderately overall, with only 20% of necessary Practitioner Description items included on average. Audit scores revealed inconsistent abstract reporting and few audited case reports including client race (20%), perspective (26%), and occupation/ activities (40%); practitioner practice setting (12%), training (12%), scope-of-practice (29%), and credentialing (20%); adverse events or lack thereof (17%); and some aspect of informed consent (34%). Treatment descriptor item reporting varied from high to low. Various implications of concern are discussed. Conclusion: The current audit and descriptive analysis highlight several reporting inconsistencies in TMB case reports prior to 2015. Reporting guidelines for case reports are important if standards for, and impact of, TMB case reports are desired. Adherence to reporting specifications outlined by the TMB-adapted CARE guidelines could improve the impact and usability of TMB case reports in research, education, and practice.Item Identifying Inconsistencies and Reporting Deficits in Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork (TMB) Case Reports Authored by TMB Practitioners: a TMB-Adapted CAse REport (CARE) Guidelines Audit Through 2014(Massage Therapy Foundation, 2016-09-09) Munk, Niki; Shue, Sarah; Freeland, Emilee; Ralston, Rick K.; Boulanger, Karen T.; Department of Health Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesINTRODUCTION: Case reports are a fundamental tool through which therapeutic massage and bodywork (TMB) practitioners can inform research and impact their field by detailing the presentation, treatment, and follow-up of a single individual encountered in practice. Inconsistencies in case reporting limit their impact as fundamental sources of clinical evidence. Using the TMB-adapted CAse REport (CARE) guidelines, the current study sought to provide a rich description regarding the reporting quality of TMB practitioner authored TMB case reports in the literature. METHODS: 1) Systematic identification of published, peer-reviewed TMB case reports authored by TMB practitioners following PRISMA recommendations; 2) audit development based on TMB-adapted CARE guidelines; 3) audit implementation; and 4) descriptive analysis of audit scores. RESULTS: Our search identified 977 articles and 35 met study inclusion criteria. On average, TMB case reports included approximately 58% of the total items identified as necessary by the TMB-adapted CARE guidelines. Introduction sections of case reports had the best item reporting (80% on average), while Case Presentation (54%) and Results (52%) sections scored moderately overall, with only 20% of necessary Practitioner Description items included on average. Audit scores revealed inconsistent abstract reporting and few audited case reports including client race (20%), perspective (26%), and occupation/activities (40%); practitioner practice setting (12%), training (12%), scope-of-practice (29%), and credentialing (20%); adverse events or lack thereof (17%); and some aspect of informed consent (34%). Treatment descriptor item reporting varied from high to low. Various implications of concern are discussed. CONCLUSION: The current audit and descriptive analysis highlight several reporting inconsistencies in TMB case reports prior to 2015. Reporting guidelines for case reports are important if standards for, and impact of, TMB case reports are desired. Adherence to reporting specifications outlined by the TMB-adapted CARE guidelines could improve the impact and usability of TMB case reports in research, education, and practice.Item Identifying Inconsistencies and Reporting Deficits in Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork (TMB) Case Reports: A Systematic Review and TMB Adapted CAse REport (CARE) Guidelines Audit(Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, 2015-04-17) Munk, Niki; Shue, Sarah; Freeland, Emilee; Ralston, Rick K.; Boulanger, KarenIntroduction: Case reports are a fundamental tool through which practitioners in applied disciplines are able to inform research and impact their field by detailing the presentation, treatment, and follow-up of a single individual they’ve encountered in practice. Ideally, published case reports contribute to reductions in the research/practice gap by allowing practitioners to describe current practice situations and outcomes to researchers. Unfortunately, inconsistencies in case reporting across applied disciplines have limited the impact of these fundamental sources of clinical evidence. In 2013, reporting guidelines for case reports (CARE guidelines) were published to standardize the reporting of medical case reports. In recognition of discipline differences and reporting needs, the therapeutic massage and bodywork (TMB) adapted CARE guidelines were published in late 2014 to specifically guide reporting of case reports involving massage therapy applied as a treatment. The TMB adapted CARE guidelines identified 5 primary case report components (pre-manuscript, Introduction, Case Presentation, Results, and Discussion), each with unique subcomponents (e.g., title, keywords, abstract for the pre-manuscript component) ranging in number from 6 - 31. By checking off each component and subcomponent included in any given case report, a summary score for TMB adapted CARE guidelines compliance (range: 0 – 65) can be derived. In order to determine whether the consistency of TMB case reporting is improved after publication of the TMB adapted CARE guidelines, a pre-guideline state of TMB case reports is needed. The current study seeks to provide rich descriptive statistics about the state of TMB related case reports in the literature prior to 2015. Methods: A systematic review using PubMed and CINAHL databases identified 935 unique citations using first the MeSH term “Therapy, Soft Tissue” as the subject heading and publication type “case reports” and then a keyword search in PubMed (acupressure, shiatsu, zhi ya, chih ya, reflexology, rolfing, bodywork, massage, case report, case reports, case study, case studies NOT carotid sinus massage, heart massage, cardiac massage, animals) and CINAHL (subject headings: massage therapists, massage, reflexology, case study). Study inclusion/exclusion criteria required: case report, human, English, peer-reviewed, published prior to 2015. Administered massage treatment(s) had to have been from a professional TMB practitioner who had a role in the case’s reporting and publication. N=34 articles met inclusion criteria and were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Through a REDCap data collection form, components and subcomponents of the TMB adapted CARE reporting guidelines included in each article were identified. Variable coding and descriptive statistics were completed using SAS 9.3 by a non-reviewing team member. TMB adapted CARE reporting compliance scores were determined for each case report. Results: Preliminary results for n=30 (final presentation to include all N=34) indicate mean compliance scores = 40.3 (±9.2) and ranged from 10-50. Article sections with the most robust scoring included pre-manuscript items and introduction with average section scores obtaining 75% and 70% of the possible points, respectively. Case presentation and results sections scored the poorest, obtaining an average of 58% and 53% of the possible points, respectively. Conclusions: Case reports in the TMB field published before possible exposure to the TMB adapted CARE guidelines demonstrate inconsistent and deficient reporting. If case reports in the TMB field are to have an impact, consistent and rigorous reporting must be adopted. In an effort to improve the state and impact of TMB case reports in the literature, TMB practitioners should use the TMB adapted CARE guidelines as a checklist when preparing their case reports for publication.