Browsing by Author "Pike, Caitlin A."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open for Health: How Open Access Can Create a More Equitable World
    (2021-10-08) Pike, Caitlin A.
    This lesson plan was created for the Scholarly Communications Notebook (SCN). The SCN is a hub of open teaching and learning content on scholarly communications topics that is both a complement to an open book-level introduction to scholarly communication librarianship and a disciplinary and course community for inclusively sharing models and practices. IMLS funded the SCN in 2019. In this lesson plan, there is an optional reading list to review the literature related to OA, health equity, and social justice to provide background on the topics depending on student familiarity. A brief PowerPoint lecture is included to provide an overview, and then students will break into groups, and each group will be given a topic with questions to spark discussion on the subject. Questions such as "Historically, how has access to health information created benefits or barriers to users?" or "When thinking about medical research, what stakeholders are concerned about open access and why?" Each group will select a notetaker to keep track of the responses, and time will be given at the end of the class to report out and have a wider discussion with each other.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Providing Evidence about the Pandemic: Librarian Roles on a Rapid Response Team for COVID-19
    (2021-05-27) Craven, Hannah J.; Hinrichs, Rachel J.; Pike, Caitlin A.; Blevins, Amy E.
    BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 has led to a deluge of information. Health leaders/personnel need curated and synthesized information to aid their decision making regarding diagnosis, treatment, mitigation, reopening plans, etc. A collaboration involving the state department of health has been developed to respond to those needs. Several programs were created simultaneously, two of which depend on active librarian involvement. One focuses on rapid expert responses to questions from state leadership supported by annotated bibliographies. The other is a daily digest of emerging literature including reviews on patient care, law and ethics, communication, forecasting and surveillance, schools, and mitigation. DESCRIPTION: Librarians from several libraries at a university are responding to the need for synthesized high-quality information related to the pandemic. These librarians have expertise in the areas of evidence-based medicine, data management, public health, and law. From the beginning, librarians have been heavily involved in creating workflows related to project and data management. Project management included having a standard process for tracking questions, delivering information, and team development. Librarians developed the team through onboarding, defining roles, scheduling, consistent communication, and shared document templates. Librarians created data management processes such as citation management, readme files, file management/naming conventions, data backup, etc. Librarians encouraged adoption of creative commons license notices on public-facing work to make the information more accessible. Project assessment was built into workflows and includes tracking: questions, turn around time, updates, and return on investment. CONCLUSION: Since the inception of this program, librarians have answered over 108 questions and provided 18 updates to annotated bibliographies. The average turnaround time for creating annotated bibliographies is 16 hours with a range of 2-48 hours. In addition, librarians have provided searches to support over 900 blog posts for WISE Indiana. While the pandemic has been stressful, this project provided us with an outlet to support our state. In addition, this project has led to: increased visibility for librarians, salary savings for the library, and recognition for our contributions that led to the receipt of an Award for Excellence in Public Health from Dr. Kristina Box​, the State Health Commissioner for Indiana.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Review of menopausal palpitations measures
    (BMC, 2021-05-31) Sheng, Ying; Carpenter, Janet S.; Elomba, Charles D.; Alwine, Jennifer S.; Yue, Min; Pike, Caitlin A.; Chen, Chen X.; Tisdale, James E.; School of Nursing
    Palpitations are reported commonly by women around the time of menopause as skipped, missed, irregular, and/or exaggerated heartbeats or heart pounding. However, much less is known about palpitations than other menopausal symptoms such as vasomotor symptoms. The objective of this review was to integrate evidence on menopausal palpitations measures. Keyword searching was done in PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for English-language, descriptive articles containing data on menopause and palpitations and meeting other pre-specified inclusion criteria. Of 670 articles, 110 met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Results showed that 11 different measures were used across articles, with variability within and between measures. Inconsistencies in the wording of measurement items, recall periods, and response options were observed even when standardized measures were used. Most measures were limited to assessing symptom presence and severity. Findings suggest that efforts should be undertaken to (1) standardize conceptual and operational definitions of menopausal palpitations and (2) develop a patient-friendly, conceptually clear, psychometrically sound measure of menopausal palpitations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Systematic Review of Palpitations Prevalence by Menopausal Status
    (Springer, 2021-03) Carpenter, Janet S.; Sheng, Ying; Elomba, Charles D.; Alwine, Jennifer S.; Yue, Min; Pike, Caitlin A.; Chen, Chen X.; Tisdale, James E.; School of Nursing
    Purpose of the Review The purpose was to systematically review evidence on the prevalence of palpitations by menopausal stage. Palpitations are a feeling of missed, irregular, or exaggerated heart beats. Recent Findings Carefully delineated search, screening, and data extraction strategies resulted in five articles for review. Articles offered cross-sectional findings from menopausal symptom surveys from five countries between 1974 and 2011 with clinic- and community-based samples of premenopausal, perimenopausal, and postmenopausal women. Reported studies were good (n = 2) to fair (n = 3) quality with low (n = 2) to moderate (n = 3) bias. Menopausal palpitations were not the focus of any study but were assessed as a single item of heart racing, pounding, or discomfort over the past 2 weeks, month, or year. Palpitations prevalence rates by menopausal stage were 3.7 to 40.2% premenopausal, 20.1 to 40.2% perimenopausal, and 15.7 to 54.1% postmenopausal. Three of five articles showed that compared with premenopausal and postmenopausal women, palpitation prevalence was significantly higher among perimenopausal and surgically postmenopausal women. Summary Good-quality evidence on palpitation prevalence by menopausal stage is limited but suggests that physiological changes of menopause may play a role in this symptom. Measurement varied, suggesting a need to standardize the assessment of menopausal palpitations. The review findings suggest a strong need for clinicians and researchers to collaborate to standardize documentation of menopausal palpitations across the menopause transition.