Browsing by Author "Mummery, Catherine J."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in the DIAN-TU-001 Trial of Gantenerumab and Solanezumab: Lessons from a Trial in Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease
    (Wiley, 2022) Joseph-Mathurin, Nelly; Llibre-Guerra, Jorge J.; Li, Yan; McCullough, Austin A.; Hofmann, Carsten; Wojtowicz, Jakub; Park, Ethan; Wang, Guoqiao; Preboske, Gregory M.; Wang, Qing; Gordon, Brian A.; Chen, Charles D.; Flores, Shaney; Aggarwal, Neelum T.; Berman, Sarah B.; Bird, Thomas D.; Black, Sandra E.; Borowski, Bret; Brooks, William S.; Chhatwal, Jasmeer P.; Clarnette, Roger; Cruchaga, Carlos; Fagan, Anne M.; Farlow, Martin; Fox, Nick C.; Gauthier, Serge; Hassenstab, Jason; Hobbs, Diana A.; Holdridge, Karen C.; Honig, Lawrence S.; Hornbeck, Russ C.; Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R.; Jack, Clifford R., Jr.; Jimenez-Velazquez, Ivonne Z.; Jucker, Mathias; Klein, Gregory; Levin, Johannes; Mancini, Michele; Masellis, Mario; McKay, Nicole S.; Mummery, Catherine J.; Ringman, John M.; Shimada, Hiroyuki; Snider, B. Joy; Suzuki, Kazushi; Wallon, David; Xiong, Chengjie; Yaari, Roy; McDade, Eric; Perrin, Richard J.; Bateman, Randall J.; Salloway, Stephen P.; Benzinger, Tammie L. S.; Clifford, David B.; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Objective: To determine the characteristics of participants with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in a trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease (DIAD). Methods: 142 DIAD mutation carriers received either gantenerumab SC (n = 52), solanezumab IV (n = 50), or placebo (n = 40). Participants underwent assessments with the Clinical Dementia Rating® (CDR®), neuropsychological testing, CSF biomarkers, β-amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor ARIA. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses evaluated potential ARIA-related risk factors. Results: Eleven participants developed ARIA-E, including 3 with mild symptoms. No ARIA-E was reported under solanezumab while gantenerumab was associated with ARIA-E compared to placebo (odds ratio [OR] = 9.1, confidence interval [CI][1.2, 412.3]; p = 0.021). Under gantenerumab, APOE-ɛ4 carriers were more likely to develop ARIA-E (OR = 5.0, CI[1.0, 30.4]; p = 0.055), as were individuals with microhemorrhage at baseline (OR = 13.7, CI[1.2, 163.2]; p = 0.039). No ARIA-E was observed at the initial 225 mg/month gantenerumab dose, and most cases were observed at doses >675 mg. At first ARIA-E occurrence, all ARIA-E participants were amyloid-PET+, 60% were CDR >0, 60% were past their estimated year to symptom onset, and 60% had also incident ARIA-H. Most ARIA-E radiologically resolved after dose adjustment and developing ARIA-E did not significantly increase odds of trial discontinuation. ARIA-E was more frequently observed in the occipital lobe (90%). ARIA-E severity was associated with age at time of ARIA-E. Interpretation: In DIAD, solanezumab was not associated with ARIA. Gantenerumab dose over 225 mg increased ARIA-E risk, with additional risk for individuals APOE-ɛ4(+) or with microhemorrhage. ARIA-E was reversible on MRI in most cases, generally asymptomatic, without additional risk for trial discontinuation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Avoid or Embrace? Practice Effects in Alzheimer’s Disease Prevention Trials
    (Frontiers Media, 2022-06-16) Aschenbrenner, Andrew J.; Hassenstab, Jason; Wang, Guoqiao; Li, Yan; Xiong, Chengjie; McDade, Eric; Clifford, David B.; Salloway, Stephen; Farlow, Martin; Yaari, Roy; Cheng, Eden Y. J.; Holdridge, Karen C.; Mummery, Catherine J.; Masters, Colin L.; Hsiung, Ging-Yuek; Surti, Ghulam; Day, Gregory S.; Weintraub, Sandra; Honig, Lawrence S.; Galvin, James E.; Ringman, John M.; Brooks, William S.; Fox, Nick C.; Snyder, Peter J.; Suzuki, Kazushi; Shimada, Hiroyuki; Gräber, Susanne; Bateman, Randall J.; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit (DIAN-TU); Neurology, School of Medicine
    Demonstrating a slowing in the rate of cognitive decline is a common outcome measure in clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Selection of cognitive endpoints typically includes modeling candidate outcome measures in the many, richly phenotyped observational cohort studies available. An important part of choosing cognitive endpoints is a consideration of improvements in performance due to repeated cognitive testing (termed "practice effects"). As primary and secondary AD prevention trials are comprised predominantly of cognitively unimpaired participants, practice effects may be substantial and may have considerable impact on detecting cognitive change. The extent to which practice effects in AD prevention trials are similar to those from observational studies and how these potential differences impact trials is unknown. In the current study, we analyzed data from the recently completed DIAN-TU-001 clinical trial (TU) and the associated DIAN-Observational (OBS) study. Results indicated that asymptomatic mutation carriers in the TU exhibited persistent practice effects on several key outcomes spanning the entire trial duration. Critically, these practice related improvements were larger on certain tests in the TU relative to matched participants from the OBS study. Our results suggest that the magnitude of practice effects may not be captured by modeling potential endpoints in observational studies where assessments are typically less frequent and drug expectancy effects are absent. Using alternate instrument forms (represented in our study by computerized tasks) may partly mitigate practice effects in clinical trials but incorporating practice effects as outcomes may also be viable. Thus, investigators must carefully consider practice effects (either by minimizing them or modeling them directly) when designing cognitive endpoint AD prevention trials by utilizing trial data with similar assessment frequencies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Downstream Biomarker Effects of Gantenerumab or Solanezumab in Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease: The DIAN-TU-001 Randomized Clinical Trial
    (American Medical Association, 2024) Wagemann, Olivia; Liu, Haiyan; Wang, Guoqiao; Shi, Xinyu; Bittner, Tobias; Scelsi, Marzia A.; Farlow, Martin R.; Clifford, David B.; Supnet-Bell, Charlene; Santacruz, Anna M.; Aschenbrenner, Andrew J.; Hassenstab, Jason J.; Benzinger, Tammie L. S.; Gordon, Brian A.; Coalier, Kelley A.; Cruchaga, Carlos; Ibanez, Laura; Perrin, Richard J.; Xiong, Chengjie; Li, Yan; Morris, John C.; Lah, James J.; Berman, Sarah B.; Roberson, Erik D.; van Dyck, Christopher H.; Galasko, Douglas; Gauthier, Serge; Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R.; Brooks, William S.; Pariente, Jérémie; Mummery, Catherine J.; Day, Gregory S.; Ringman, John M.; Mendez, Patricio Chrem; St. George-Hyslop, Peter; Fox, Nick C.; Suzuki, Kazushi; Okhravi, Hamid R.; Chhatwal, Jasmeer; Levin, Johannes; Jucker, Mathias; Sims, John R.; Holdridge, Karen C.; Proctor, Nicholas K.; Yaari, Roy; Andersen, Scott W.; Mancini, Michele; Llibre-Guerra, Jorge; Bateman, Randall J.; McDade, Eric; Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network–Trials Unit; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Importance: Effects of antiamyloid agents, targeting either fibrillar or soluble monomeric amyloid peptides, on downstream biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma are largely unknown in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease (DIAD). Objective: To investigate longitudinal biomarker changes of synaptic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration in individuals with DIAD who are receiving antiamyloid treatment. Design, setting, and participants: From 2012 to 2019, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trial Unit (DIAN-TU-001) study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, investigated gantenerumab and solanezumab in DIAD. Carriers of gene variants were assigned 3:1 to either drug or placebo. The present analysis was conducted from April to June 2023. DIAN-TU-001 spans 25 study sites in 7 countries. Biofluids and neuroimaging from carriers of DIAD gene variants in the gantenerumab, solanezumab, and placebo groups were analyzed. Interventions: In 2016, initial dosing of gantenerumab, 225 mg (subcutaneously every 4 weeks) was increased every 8 weeks up to 1200 mg. In 2017, initial dosing of solanezumab, 400 mg (intravenously every 4 weeks) was increased up to 1600 mg every 4 weeks. Main outcomes and measures: Longitudinal changes in CSF levels of neurogranin, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), chitinase 3-like 1 protein (YKL-40), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light protein (NfL), and plasma levels of GFAP and NfL. Results: Of 236 eligible participants screened, 43 were excluded. A total of 142 participants (mean [SD] age, 44 [10] years; 72 female [51%]) were included in the study (gantenerumab, 52 [37%]; solanezumab, 50 [35%]; placebo, 40 [28%]). Relative to placebo, gantenerumab significantly reduced CSF neurogranin level at year 4 (mean [SD] β = -242.43 [48.04] pg/mL; P < .001); reduced plasma GFAP level at year 1 (mean [SD] β = -0.02 [0.01] ng/mL; P = .02), year 2 (mean [SD] β = -0.03 [0.01] ng/mL; P = .002), and year 4 (mean [SD] β = -0.06 [0.02] ng/mL; P < .001); and increased CSF sTREM2 level at year 2 (mean [SD] β = 1.12 [0.43] ng/mL; P = .01) and year 4 (mean [SD] β = 1.06 [0.52] ng/mL; P = .04). Solanezumab significantly increased CSF NfL (log) at year 4 (mean [SD] β = 0.14 [0.06]; P = .02). Correlation analysis for rates of change found stronger correlations between CSF markers and fluid markers with Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography for solanezumab and placebo. Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial supports the importance of fibrillar amyloid reduction in multiple AD-related processes of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in CSF and plasma in DIAD. Additional studies of antiaggregated amyloid therapies in sporadic AD and DIAD are needed to determine the utility of nonamyloid biomarkers in determining disease modification.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Single ascending dose results from an ongoing Phase 1 study of mivelsiran (ALN‐APP), the first investigational RNA interference therapeutic targeting amyloid precursor protein for Alzheimer’s disease
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Cohen, Sharon; Ducharme, Simon; Brosch, Jared R.; Vijverberg, Everard G. B.; Sostelly, Alexandre; Goteti, Sasikiran; Farrugia, Lynn; Avbersek, Andreja; Kaspar, Cristin; Mummery, Catherine J.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Mivelsiran (ALN‐APP) is an investigational, intrathecally administered RNA interference therapeutic designed to lower levels of amyloid‐β (Aβ) peptide, a key driver of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) pathogenesis, by reducing upstream production of amyloid precursor protein (APP). We report additional safety, pharmacodynamic, and biomarker data from the double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, single ascending dose part of the ongoing mivelsiran Phase 1 study (NCT05231785). Method: Patients with early‐onset AD (symptom onset <65 years of age, Clinical Dementia Rating global score 0.5 or 1.0, and Mini‐Mental State Examination score >20) were randomized to single intrathecal doses of mivelsiran (25mg, 50mg, or 75mg) or placebo and evaluated for 6 months (plus up to 6‐months follow‐up if needed to achieve washout). Primary endpoint was frequency of adverse events (AEs). Pharmacological effects of mivelsiran (secondary endpoints) and exploratory biomarkers of disease progression were also evaluated. Result: As of November 16, 2023, 20 patients (mean [range] age, 61.3 [53–73] years; 60.0% male; 80.0% white) were randomized to mivelsiran or placebo in 25mg (N = 6, 2:1 randomization), 50mg (N = 8, 3:1), and 75mg (N = 6, 2:1) cohorts. In these pooled cohorts, AEs were reported in 19 patients (95.0%), all of mild or moderate severity (Table 1). One patient experienced two mild AEs that were considered both study drug and procedure related. No serious AEs or deaths occurred. Reductions from baseline in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) soluble APPα and APPβ levels were rapid and sustained through ongoing data capture (i.e., Month 6 with mivelsiran 50mg and Month 10 with mivelsiran 75mg; Table 2), and were accompanied by sustained reductions from baseline in CSF Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels available through Month 6 (Table 3). Safety and pharmacodynamic data of up to 6 months from additional mivelsiran dose cohorts will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: In this ongoing Phase 1 single ascending dose study, mivelsiran 50mg and 75mg were well tolerated and produced robust, durable reductions in CSF levels of soluble APP and downstream Aβ42 and Aβ40, key proteins implicated in progression of AD and CAA. These interim results support further evaluation of mivelsiran in patients with AD or CAA.