Browsing by Author "Mathews, Kusum S."

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association Between Early Treatment With Tocilizumab and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
    (American Medical Association, 2020-10-20) Gupta, Shruti; Wang, Wei; Hayek, Salim S.; Chan, Lili; Mathews, Kusum S.; Melamed, Michal L.; Brenner, Samantha K.; Leonberg-Yoo, Amanda; Schenck, Edward J.; Radbel, Jared; Reiser, Jochen; Bansal, Anip; Srivastava, Anand; Zhou, Yan; Finkel, Diana; Green, Adam; Mallappallil, Mary; Faugno, Anthony J.; Zhang, Jingjing; Velez, Juan Carlos Q.; Shaefi, Shahzad; Parikh, Chirag R.; Charytan, David M.; Athavale, Ambarish M.; Friedman, Allon N.; Redfern, Roberta E.; Short, Samuel A. P.; Correa, Simon; Pokharel, Kapil K.; Admon, Andrew J.; Donnelly, John P.; Gershengorn, Hayley B.; Douin, David J.; Semler, Matthew W.; Hernán, Miguel A.; Leaf, David E.; STOP-COVID Investigators; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Importance: Therapies that improve survival in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are needed. Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin 6 receptor, may counteract the inflammatory cytokine release syndrome in patients with severe COVID-19 illness. Objective: To test whether tocilizumab decreases mortality in this population. Design, Setting, and Participants: The data for this study were derived from a multicenter cohort study of 4485 adults with COVID-19 admitted to participating intensive care units (ICUs) at 68 hospitals across the US from March 4 to May 10, 2020. Critically ill adults with COVID-19 were categorized according to whether they received or did not receive tocilizumab in the first 2 days of admission to the ICU. Data were collected retrospectively until June 12, 2020. A Cox regression model with inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for confounding. Exposures: Treatment with tocilizumab in the first 2 days of ICU admission. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to death, compared via hazard ratios (HRs), and 30-day mortality, compared via risk differences. Results: Among the 3924 patients included in the analysis (2464 male [62.8%]; median age, 62 [interquartile range {IQR}, 52-71] years), 433 (11.0%) received tocilizumab in the first 2 days of ICU admission. Patients treated with tocilizumab were younger (median age, 58 [IQR, 48-65] vs 63 [IQR, 52-72] years) and had a higher prevalence of hypoxemia on ICU admission (205 of 433 [47.3%] vs 1322 of 3491 [37.9%] with mechanical ventilation and a ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen of <200 mm Hg) than patients not treated with tocilizumab. After applying inverse probability weighting, baseline and severity-of-illness characteristics were well balanced between groups. A total of 1544 patients (39.3%) died, including 125 (28.9%) treated with tocilizumab and 1419 (40.6%) not treated with tocilizumab. In the primary analysis, during a median follow-up of 27 (IQR, 14-37) days, patients treated with tocilizumab had a lower risk of death compared with those not treated with tocilizumab (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92). The estimated 30-day mortality was 27.5% (95% CI, 21.2%-33.8%) in the tocilizumab-treated patients and 37.1% (95% CI, 35.5%-38.7%) in the non-tocilizumab–treated patients (risk difference, 9.6%; 95% CI, 3.1%-16.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among critically ill patients with COVID-19 in this cohort study, the risk of in-hospital mortality in this study was lower in patients treated with tocilizumab in the first 2 days of ICU admission compared with patients whose treatment did not include early use of tocilizumab. However, the findings may be susceptible to unmeasured confounding, and further research from randomized clinical trials is needed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US
    (American Medical Association, 2020-07-15) Gupta, Shruti; Hayek, Salim S.; Wang, Wei; Chan, Lili; Mathews, Kusum S.; Melamed, Michal L.; Brenner, Samantha K.; Leonberg-Yoo, Amanda; Schenck, Edward J.; Radbel, Jared; Reiser, Jochen; Bansal, Anip; Srivastava, Anand; Zhou, Yan; Sutherland, Anne; Green, Adam; Shehata, Alexandre M.; Goyal, Nitender; Vijayan, Anitha; Velez, Juan Carlos Q.; Shaefi, Shahzad; Parikh, Chirag R.; Arunthamakun, Justin; Athavale, Ambarish M.; Friedman, Allon N.; Short, Samuel A. P.; Kibbelaar, Zoe A.; Omar, Samah Abu; Admon, Andrew J.; Donnelly, John P.; Gershengorn, Hayley B.; Hernán, Miguel A.; Semler, Matthew W.; Leaf, David E.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Importance: The US is currently an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, yet few national data are available on patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critical illness from COVID-19. Objectives: To assess factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes for patients with COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study assessed 2215 adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at 65 hospitals across the US from March 4 to April 4, 2020. Exposures: Patient-level data, including demographics, comorbidities, and organ dysfunction, and hospital characteristics, including number of ICU beds. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Multilevel logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes. Results: A total of 2215 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.5 [14.5] years; 1436 [64.8%] male; 1738 [78.5%] with at least 1 chronic comorbidity) were included in the study. At 28 days after ICU admission, 784 patients (35.4%) had died, 824 (37.2%) were discharged, and 607 (27.4%) remained hospitalized. At the end of study follow-up (median, 16 days; interquartile range, 8-28 days), 875 patients (39.5%) had died, 1203 (54.3%) were discharged, and 137 (6.2%) remained hospitalized. Factors independently associated with death included older age (≥80 vs <40 years of age: odds ratio [OR], 11.15; 95% CI, 6.19-20.06), male sex (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.19-1.90), higher body mass index (≥40 vs <25: OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.25), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07-2.02), active cancer (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.35-3.43), and the presence of hypoxemia (Pao2:Fio2<100 vs ≥300 mm Hg: OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 2.11-4.08), liver dysfunction (liver Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 2 vs 0: OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.30–5.25), and kidney dysfunction (renal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 4 vs 0: OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.46–4.05) at ICU admission. Patients admitted to hospitals with fewer ICU beds had a higher risk of death (<50 vs ≥100 ICU beds: OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.16-4.99). Hospitals varied considerably in the risk-adjusted proportion of patients who died (range, 6.6%-80.8%) and in the percentage of patients who received hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, and other treatments and supportive therapies. Conclusions and Relevance: This study identified demographic, clinical, and hospital-level risk factors that may be associated with death in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and can facilitate the identification of medications and supportive therapies to improve outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US
    (American Medical Association, 2020-11) Gupta, Shruti; Hayek, Salim S.; Wang, Wei; Chan, Lili; Mathews, Kusum S.; Melamed, Michal L.; Brenner, Samantha K.; Leonberg-Yoo, Amanda; Schenck, Edward J.; Radbel, Jared; Reiser, Jochen; Bansal, Anip; Srivastava, Anand; Zhou, Yan; Sutherland, Anne; Green, Adam; Shehata, Alexandre M.; Goyal, Nitender; Vijayan, Anitha; Velez, Juan Carlos Q.; Shaefi, Shahzad; Parikh, Chirag R.; Arunthamakun, Justin; Athavale, Ambarish M.; Friedman, Allon N.; Short, Samuel A.P.; Kibbelaar, Zoe A.; Omar, Samah Abu; Admon, Andrew J.; Donnelly, John P.; Gershengorn, Hayley B.; Hernán, Miguel A.; Semler, Matthew W.; Leaf, David E.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Importance: The US is currently an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, yet few national data are available on patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critical illness from COVID-19. Objectives: To assess factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes for patients with COVID-19. Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter cohort study assessed 2215 adults with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at 65 hospitals across the US from March 4 to April 4, 2020. Exposures: Patient-level data, including demographics, comorbidities, and organ dysfunction, and hospital characteristics, including number of ICU beds. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Multilevel logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with death and to examine interhospital variation in treatment and outcomes. Results: A total of 2215 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.5 [14.5] years; 1436 [64.8%] male; 1738 [78.5%] with at least 1 chronic comorbidity) were included in the study. At 28 days after ICU admission, 784 patients (35.4%) had died, 824 (37.2%) were discharged, and 607 (27.4%) remained hospitalized. At the end of study follow-up (median, 16 days; interquartile range, 8-28 days), 875 patients (39.5%) had died, 1203 (54.3%) were discharged, and 137 (6.2%) remained hospitalized. Factors independently associated with death included older age (≥80 vs <40 years of age: odds ratio [OR], 11.15; 95% CI, 6.19-20.06), male sex (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.19-1.90), higher body mass index (≥40 vs <25: OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.25), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07-2.02), active cancer (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.35-3.43), and the presence of hypoxemia (Pao2:Fio2<100 vs ≥300 mm Hg: OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 2.11-4.08), liver dysfunction (liver Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 2-4 vs 0: OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.30-5.25), and kidney dysfunction (renal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 4 vs 0: OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.46-4.05) at ICU admission. Patients admitted to hospitals with fewer ICU beds had a higher risk of death (<50 vs ≥100 ICU beds: OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.16-4.99). Hospitals varied considerably in the risk-adjusted proportion of patients who died (range, 6.6%-80.8%) and in the percentage of patients who received hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, and other treatments and supportive therapies. Conclusions and relevance: This study identified demographic, clinical, and hospital-level risk factors that may be associated with death in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and can facilitate the identification of medications and supportive therapies to improve outcomes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Thrombosis, Bleeding, and the Observational Effect of Early Therapeutic Anticoagulation on Survival in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
    (ACP, 2021) Al-Samkari, Hanny; Gupta, Shruti; Leaf, Rebecca Karp; Wang, Wei; Rosovsky, Rachel P.; Brenner, Samantha K.; Hayek, Salim S.; Berlin, Hanna; Kapoor, Rajat; Shaefi, Shahzad; Melamed, Michal L.; Sutherland, Anne; Radbel, Jared; Green, Adam; Garibaldi, Brian T.; Srivastava, Anand; Leonberg-Yoo, Amanda; Shehata, Alexandre M.; Flythe, Jennifer E.; Rashidi, Arash; Goyal, Nitender; Chan, Lili; Mathews, Kusum S.; Hedayati, S. Susan; Dy, Rajany; Toth-Manikowski, Stephanie M.; Zhang, Jingjing; Mallappallil, Mary; Redfern, Roberta E.; Bansal, Amar D.; Short, Samuel A.P.; Vangel, Mark G.; Admon, Andrew J.; Semler, Matthew W.; Bauer, Kenneth A.; Hernán, Miguel A.; Leaf, David E.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Hypercoagulability may be a key mechanism of death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Objective: To evaluate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and examine the observational effect of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival. Design: In a multicenter cohort study of 3239 critically ill adults with COVID-19, the incidence of VTE and major bleeding within 14 days after intensive care unit (ICU) admission was evaluated. A target trial emulation in which patients were categorized according to receipt or no receipt of therapeutic anticoagulation in the first 2 days of ICU admission was done to examine the observational effect of early therapeutic anticoagulation on survival. A Cox model with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding was used. Setting: 67 hospitals in the United States. Participants: Adults with COVID-19 admitted to a participating ICU. Measurements: Time to death, censored at hospital discharge, or date of last follow-up. Results: Among the 3239 patients included, the median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 53 to 71 years), and 2088 (64.5%) were men. A total of 204 patients (6.3%) developed VTE, and 90 patients (2.8%) developed a major bleeding event. Independent predictors of VTE were male sex and higher D-dimer level on ICU admission. Among the 2809 patients included in the target trial emulation, 384 (11.9%) received early therapeutic anticoagulation. In the primary analysis, during a median follow-up of 27 days, patients who received early therapeutic anticoagulation had a similar risk for death as those who did not (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.35]). Limitation: Observational design. Conclusion: Among critically ill adults with COVID-19, early therapeutic anticoagulation did not affect survival in the target trial emulation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Wellness and Coping of Physicians Who Worked in ICUs During the Pandemic: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional North American Survey
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Burns, Karen E.A.; Moss, Marc; Lorens, Edmund; Jose, Elizabeth Karin Ann; Martin, Claudio M.; Viglianti, Elizabeth M.; Fox-Robichaud, Alison; Mathews, Kusum S.; Akgun, Kathleen; Jain, Snigdha; Gershengorn, Hayley; Mehta, Sangeeta; Han, Jenny E.; Martin, Gregory S.; Liebler, Janice M.; Stapleton, Renee D.; Trachuk, Polina; Vranas, Kelly C.; Chua, Abigail; Herridge, Margaret S.; Tsang, Jennifer L.Y.; Biehl, Michelle; Burnham, Ellen L.; Chen, Jen-Ting; Attia, Engi F.; Mohamed, Amira; Harkins, Michelle S.; Soriano, Sheryll M.; Maddux, Aline; West, Julia C.; Badke, Andrew R.; Bagshaw, Sean M.; Binnie, Alexandra; Carlos, W. Graham; Çoruh, Başak; Crothers, Kristina; D'Aragon, Frederick; Denson, Joshua Lee; Drover, John W.; Eschun, Gregg; Geagea, Anna; Griesdale, Donald; Hadler, Rachel; Hancock, Jennifer; Hasmatali, Jovan; Kaul, Bhavika; Kerlin, Meeta Prasad; Kohn, Rachel; Kutsogiannis, D. James; Matson, Scott M.; Morris, Peter E.; Paunovic, Bojan; Peltan, Ithan D.; Piquette, Dominique; Pirzadeh, Mina; Pulchan, Krishna; Schnapp, Lynn M.; Sessler, Curtis N.; Smith, Heather; Sy, Eric; Thirugnanam, Subarna; McDonald, Rachel K.; McPherson, Katie A.; Kraft, Monica; Spiegel, Michelle; Dodek, Peter M.; Diversity-Related Research Committee of the Women in Critical Care (WICC) Interest Group of the American Thoracic Society; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Objectives: Few surveys have focused on physician moral distress, burnout, and professional fulfilment. We assessed physician wellness and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: Cross-sectional survey using four validated instruments. Setting: Sixty-two sites in Canada and the United States. Subjects: Attending physicians (adult, pediatric; intensivist, nonintensivist) who worked in North American ICUs. Intervention: None. Measurements and main results: We analysed 431 questionnaires (43.3% response rate) from 25 states and eight provinces. Respondents were predominantly male (229 [55.6%]) and in practice for 11.8 ± 9.8 years. Compared with prepandemic, respondents reported significant intrapandemic increases in days worked/mo, ICU bed occupancy, and self-reported moral distress (240 [56.9%]) and burnout (259 [63.8%]). Of the 10 top-ranked items that incited moral distress, most pertained to regulatory/organizational ( n = 6) or local/institutional ( n = 2) issues or both ( n = 2). Average moral distress (95.6 ± 66.9), professional fulfilment (6.5 ± 2.1), and burnout scores (3.6 ± 2.0) were moderate with 227 physicians (54.6%) meeting burnout criteria. A significant dose-response existed between COVID-19 patient volume and moral distress scores. Physicians who worked more days/mo and more scheduled in-house nightshifts, especially combined with more unscheduled in-house nightshifts, experienced significantly more moral distress. One in five physicians used at least one maladaptive coping strategy. We identified four coping profiles (active/social, avoidant, mixed/ambivalent, infrequent) that were associated with significant differences across all wellness measures. Conclusions: Despite moderate intrapandemic moral distress and burnout, physicians experienced moderate professional fulfilment. However, one in five physicians used at least one maladaptive coping strategy. We highlight potentially modifiable factors at individual, institutional, and regulatory levels to enhance physician wellness.