Browsing by Author "Lago, Argentina Lario"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Association of Plasma P-tau217 and P-tau181 with clinical phenotype, neuropathology, and imaging markers in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a retrospective diagnostic performance study
    (Elsevier, 2021) Thijssen, Elisabeth H.; La Joie, Renaud; Strom, Amelia; Fonseca, Corrina; Iaccarino, Leonardo; Wolf, Amy; Spina, Salvatore; Allen, Isabel E.; Cobigo, Yann; Heuer, Hilary; VandeVrede, Lawren; Proctor, Nicholas K.; Lago, Argentina Lario; Baker, Suzanne; Sivasankaran, Rajeev; Kieloch, Agnieszka; Kinhikar, Arvind; Yu, Lili; Valentin, Marie-Anne; Jeromin, Andreas; Zetterberg, Henrik; Hansson, Oskar; Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas; Graham, Danielle; Blennow, Kaj; Kramer, Joel H.; Grinberg, Lea T.; Seeley, William W.; Rosen, Howard; Boeve, Bradley F.; Miller, Bruce L.; Teunissen, Charlotte E.; Rabinovici, Gil D.; Rojas, Julio C.; Dage, Jeffrey L.; Boxer, Adam L.; Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration investigators; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) are associated with Alzheimer's disease tau pathology. We compared the diagnostic value of both biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired participants and patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease syndromes, or frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) syndromes. Methods: In this retrospective multicohort diagnostic performance study, we analysed plasma samples, obtained from patients aged 18-99 years old who had been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (Alzheimer's disease dementia, logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia, or posterior cortical atrophy), FTLD syndromes (corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, non-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia, or semantic variant primary progressive aphasia), or mild cognitive impairment; the participants were from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Memory and Aging Center, San Francisco, CA, USA, and the Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium (ARTFL; 17 sites in the USA and two in Canada). Participants from both cohorts were carefully characterised, including assessments of CSF p-tau181, amyloid-PET or tau-PET (or both), and clinical and cognitive evaluations. Plasma p-tau181 and p-tau217 were measured using electrochemiluminescence-based assays, which differed only in the biotinylated antibody epitope specificity. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to determine diagnostic accuracy of both plasma markers using clinical diagnosis, neuropathological findings, and amyloid-PET and tau-PET measures as gold standards. Difference between two area under the curve (AUC) analyses were tested with the Delong test. Findings: Data were collected from 593 participants (443 from UCSF and 150 from ARTFL, mean age 64 years [SD 13], 294 [50%] women) between July 1 and Nov 30, 2020. Plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 were correlated (r=0·90, p<0·0001). Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 concentrations were increased in people with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (n=75, mean age 65 years [SD 10]) relative to cognitively unimpaired controls (n=118, mean age 61 years [SD 18]; AUC=0·98 [95% CI 0·95-1·00] for p-tau217, AUC=0·97 [0·94-0·99] for p-tau181; pdiff=0·31) and in pathology-confirmed Alzheimer's disease (n=15, mean age 73 years [SD 12]) versus pathologically confirmed FTLD (n=68, mean age 67 years [SD 8]; AUC=0·96 [0·92-1·00] for p-tau217, AUC=0·91 [0·82-1·00] for p-tau181; pdiff=0·22). P-tau217 outperformed p-tau181 in differentiating patients with Alzheimer's disease syndromes (n=75) from those with FTLD syndromes (n=274, mean age 67 years [SD 9]; AUC=0·93 [0·91-0·96] for p-tau217, AUC=0·91 [0·88-0·94] for p-tau181; pdiff=0·01). P-tau217 was a stronger indicator of amyloid-PET positivity (n=146, AUC=0·91 [0·88-0·94]) than was p-tau181 (n=214, AUC=0·89 [0·86-0·93]; pdiff=0·049). Tau-PET binding in the temporal cortex was more strongly associated with p-tau217 than p-tau181 (r=0·80 vs r=0·72; pdiff<0·0001, n=230). Interpretation: Both p-tau217 and p-tau181 had excellent diagnostic performance for differentiating patients with Alzheimer's disease syndromes from other neurodegenerative disorders. There was some evidence in favour of p-tau217 compared with p-tau181 for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease syndromes versus FTLD syndromes, as an indication of amyloid-PET-positivity, and for stronger correlations with tau-PET signal. Pending replication in independent, diverse, and older cohorts, plasma p-tau217 and p-tau181 could be useful screening tools to identify individuals with underlying amyloid and Alzheimer's disease tau pathology.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical and neuropathological associations of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, p‐tau217 and neurofilament light in sporadic frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders
    (Wiley, 2025-01-29) Rajbanshi, Binita; Araujo, Igor Prufer Q. C.; VandeVrede, Lawren; Ljubenkov, Peter A.; Staffaroni, Adam M.; Heuer, Hilary W.; Lago, Argentina Lario; Ramos, Eliana Marisa; Petrucelli, Leonard; Gendron, Tania; Dage, Jeffrey L.; Seeley, William W.; Grinberg, Lea T.; Spina, Salvatore; Bateman, Randall J.; Rosen, Howard J.; Boeve, Bradley F.; Boxer, Adam L.; Rojas, Julio C.; ALLFTD Consortium; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Plasma amyloid beta42/amyloid beta40 (Aβ42/Aβ40) and phosphorylated tau217 (p-tau217) identify individuals with primary Alzheimer's disease (AD). They may detect AD co-pathology in the setting of other primary neurodegenerative diseases, but this has not been systematically studied. Methods: We compared the clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropathological associations of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 (mass spectrometry), p-tau217 (electrochemiluminescence), and neurofilament light ([NfL], single molecule array [Simoa]), as markers of AD co-pathology, in a sporadic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohort (n = 620). Results: Aβ42/Aβ40 showed no clinicopathological associations. High p-tau217 was present in amnestic dementia (AmD) presumed to be due to FTD, logopenic primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), and APOEε4 carriers, and correlated with worse baseline and longitudinal clinical scores, lower hippocampal volumes, and more severe AD co-pathology (Braak Stage). NfL was elevated in all FTD phenotypes, and correlated with clinical scores and frontotemporal brain volumes. Discussion: Plasma p-tau217 has clinical, neuroimaging, and neuropathological correlates in sporadic FTD and may identify FTD cases with AD co-pathology. Highlights: Alzheimer's disease (AD) features could be identified with plasma phosphorylated tau217 (p-tau217) in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).Plasma p-tau217 is a better discriminator of AD co-pathology and AD-associated features in FTLD than plasma amyloid beta42/amyloid beta40 (Aβ42/Aβ40) and neurofilament light (NfL).In FTLD, plasma p-tau217, but not Aβ42/Aβ40 or neurofilament light, has phenotypical, neurocognitive, and neuroimaging correlates suggestive of AD co-pathology.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light across FTD spectrum disorders
    (Springer Nature, 2025-03-12) Sheth, Udit; Öijerstedt, Linn; Heckman, Michael G.; White, Launia J.; Heuer, Hilary W.; Lago, Argentina Lario; Forsberg, Leah K.; Faber, Kelley M.; Foroud, Tatiana M.; Rademakers, Rosa; Ramos, Eliana Marisa; Appleby, Brian S.; Bozoki, Andrea C.; Darby, R. Ryan; Dickerson, Bradford C.; Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko; Galasko, Douglas R.; Ghoshal, Nupur; Graff-Radford, Neill R.; Grant, Ian M.; Hales, Chadwick M.; Hsiung, Ging-Yuek Robin; Huey, Edward D.; Irwin, David; Kwan, Justin Y.; Litvan, Irene; Mackenzie, Ian R.; Masdeu, Joseph C.; Mendez, Mario F.; Onyike, Chiadi U.; Pascual, Belen; Pressman, Peter S.; Roberson, Erik D.; Snyder, Allison; Tartaglia, M. Carmela; Seeley, William W.; Dickson, Dennis W.; Rosen, Howard J.; Boeve, Bradley F.; Boxer, Adam L.; Petrucelli, Leonard; Gendron, Tania F.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    Background: Therapeutic development for frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is hindered by the lack of biomarkers that inform susceptibility/risk, prognosis, and the underlying causative pathology. Blood glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) has garnered attention as a FTD biomarker. However, investigations of GFAP in FTD have been hampered by symptomatic and histopathologic heterogeneity and small cohort sizes contributing to inconsistent findings. Therefore, we evaluated plasma GFAP as a FTD biomarker and compared its performance to that of neurofilament light (NfL) protein, a leading FTD biomarker. Methods: We availed ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) study resources to conduct a comprehensive cross-sectional and longitudinal examination of the susceptibility/risk, prognostic, and predictive performance of GFAP and NfL in the largest series of well-characterized presymptomatic FTD mutation carriers and participants with sporadic or familial FTD syndromes. Utilizing single molecule array technology, we measured GFAP and NfL in plasma from 161 controls, 127 presymptomatic mutation carriers, 702 participants with a FTD syndrome, and 67 participants with mild behavioral and/or cognitive changes. We used multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for co-variates to examine the biomarker utility of baseline GFAP and NfL concentrations or their rates of change. Results: Compared to controls, GFAP and NfL were elevated in each FTD syndrome but GFAP, unlike NfL, poorly discriminated controls from participants with mild symptoms. Similarly, both baseline GFAP and NfL were higher in presymptomatic mutation carriers who later phenoconverted, but NfL better distinguished non-converters from phenoconverters. We additionally observed that GFAP and NfL were associated with disease severity indicators and survival, but NfL far outperformed GFAP. Nevertheless, we validated findings that the GFAP/NfL ratio may discriminate frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau versus TDP-43 pathology. Conclusions: Our head-to-head comparison of plasma GFAP and NfL as biomarkers for FTD indicate that NfL consistently outmatched GFAP as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for participants with a FTD syndrome, and as a susceptibility/risk biomarker for people at genetic risk of FTD. Our findings underscore the need to include leading biomarkers in investigations evaluating new biomarkers if the field is to fully ascertain their performance and clinical value.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Temporal order of clinical and biomarker changes in familial frontotemporal dementia
    (Springer Nature, 2022) Staffaroni, Adam M.; Quintana, Melanie; Wendelberger, Barbara; Heuer, Hilary W.; Russell, Lucy L.; Cobigo, Yann; Wolf, Amy; Goh, Sheng-Yang Matt; Petrucelli, Leonard; Gendron, Tania F.; Heller, Carolin; Clark, Annie L.; Taylor, Jack Carson; Wise, Amy; Ong, Elise; Forsberg, Leah; Brushaber, Danielle; Rojas, Julio C.; VandeVrede, Lawren; Ljubenkov, Peter; Kramer, Joel; Casaletto, Kaitlin B.; Appleby, Brian; Bordelon, Yvette; Botha, Hugo; Dickerson, Bradford C.; Domoto-Reilly, Kimiko; Fields, Julie A.; Foroud, Tatiana; Gavrilova, Ralitza; Geschwind, Daniel; Ghoshal, Nupur; Goldman, Jill; Graff-Radford, Jonathon; Graff-Radford, Neill; Grossman, Murray; Hall, Matthew G. H.; Hsiung, Ging-Yuek; Huey, Edward D.; Irwin, David; Jones, David T.; Kantarci, Kejal; Kaufer, Daniel; Knopman, David; Kremers, Walter; Lago, Argentina Lario; Lapid, Maria I.; Litvan, Irene; Lucente, Diane; Mackenzie, Ian R.; Mendez, Mario F.; Mester, Carly; Miller, Bruce L.; Onyike, Chiadi U.; Rademakers, Rosa; Ramanan, Vijay K.; Ramos, Eliana Marisa; Rao, Meghana; Rascovsky, Katya; Rankin, Katherine P.; Roberson, Erik D.; Savica, Rodolfo; Tartaglia, M. Carmela; Weintraub, Sandra; Wong, Bonnie; Cash, David M.; Bouzigues, Arabella; Swift, Imogen J.; Peakman, Georgia; Bocchetta, Martina; Todd, Emily G.; Convery, Rhian S.; Rowe, James B.; Borroni, Barbara; Galimberti, Daniela; Tiraboschi, Pietro; Masellis, Mario; Finger, Elizabeth; van Swieten, John C.; Seelaar, Harro; Jiskoot, Lize C.; Sorbi, Sandro; Butler, Chris R.; Graff, Caroline; Gerhard, Alexander; Langheinrich, Tobias; Laforce, Robert; Sanchez-Valle, Raquel; de Mendonça, Alexandre; Moreno, Fermin; Synofzik, Matthis; Vandenberghe, Rik; Ducharme, Simon; Le Ber, Isabelle; Levin, Johannes; Danek, Adrian; Otto, Markus; Pasquier, Florence; Santana, Isabel; Kornak, John; Boeve, Bradley F.; Rosen, Howard J.; Rohrer, Jonathan D.; Boxer, Adam L.; Frontotemporal Dementia Prevention Initiative (FPI) Investigators; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Unlike familial Alzheimer’s disease, we have been unable to accurately predict symptom onset in presymptomatic familial frontotemporal dementia (f-FTD) mutation carriers, which is a major hurdle to designing disease prevention trials. We developed multimodal models for f-FTD disease progression and estimated clinical trial sample sizes in C9orf72, GRN, and MAPT mutation carriers. Models included longitudinal clinical and neuropsychological scores, regional brain volumes, and plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) in 796 carriers and 412 non-carrier controls. We found that the temporal ordering of clinical and biomarker progression differed by genotype. In prevention-trial simulations employing model-based patient selection, atrophy and NfL were the best endpoints, whereas clinical measures were potential endpoints in early symptomatic trials. F-FTD prevention trials are feasible but will likely require global recruitment efforts. These disease progression models will facilitate the planning of f-FTD clinical trials, including the selection of optimal endpoints and enrollment criteria to maximize power to detect treatment effects.