Browsing by Author "Keck, Juanita F."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cancer Treatment-Related Fatigue: Psychometric Testing of the Cancer Treatment-Related Fatigue Representation Scale (CTRFRep) in Patients Undergoing Radiation Treatment for Cancer
    (2010-02-02T21:24:42Z) Reuille, Kristina M.; Welch, Janet L.; Keck, Juanita F.; Fulton, Janet S.; Friesth, Barbara Manz
    Cancer treatment-related fatigue (CTRF) is recognized as a prevalent and bothersome symptom for patients with cancer. In a model of the CTRF experience, CTRF representation, or the beliefs, thoughts and emotions surrounding the experience of CTRF, is believed to mediate the relationship between CTRF intensity and CTRF distress. To date, there is no reported measure of CTRF representation. The purpose of this descriptive, cross-sectional study guided by Leventhal’s Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation was to evaluate an instrument designed to measure CTRF representation, the CTRF Representation scale (CTRFRep), based on an existing measure, the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). The study included 47 patients (mean age=57.7 years) receiving radiation therapy for cancer interviewed one month post-treatment. 77% of patients had fatigue during treatment. Three content experts and one theory expert assessed content validity of the CTRFRep. The content experts included three behavioral oncology nurse researchers whose focus is on symptom management and/or fatigue. The theory expert was a nurse researcher who is an expert in the area of self-regulation theory. As tested, the CTRFRep consisted of 105 items in 10 subscales addressing beliefs about the Identity, Timeline (Acute vs. Chronic/Cyclical), Consequences (positive/negative), Cause, Control (Treatment/Personal), Symptom Coherence, and Emotional Representation of CTRF. When evaluating psychometrics, the Identity and Cause subscales are analyzed independent of the other subscales. For the Identity subscale, symptoms most reported as related to CTRF were lack of energy, loss of strength, and feeling blue. For the Cause subscale, the most common beliefs regarding causes of CTRF were cancer treatment(s), having cancer, and stress or worry. Results indicate adequate reliability in six of eight remaining subscales (α>=0.70); the item N in those subscales was reduced from 56 to 34. To address construct validity, logistic regression assessed whether CTRFRep mediated the relationship between CTRF intensity and CTRF distress. After controlling for negative affect, the Identity and Consequences subscales were significant mediators – the Acute vs. Chronic Timeline and Emotional Representation scales were partial mediators – of the relationship between CTRF intensity on CTRF distress. These findings indicate fatigue is a problem for people undergoing treatment for cancer, and the CTRFRep may be a reliable and valid measure of CTRF representation for patients undergoing radiation treatment for cancer. Small sample size prevented successful factor analysis of the CTRFRep. Further research of the CTRFRep is warranted.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Predictors of Health-related Quality of Life at One Month after Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
    (Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, 2011-04-08) Wang, Hsiao-Lan; Mikesky, Alan; Keck, Juanita F.; Bunnell, Karen; Buelow, Janice; Rawl, Susan M.
    Significance: Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors frequently experience treatment-related complications that may cause decrements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Before interventions can be designed to enhance HRQOL in the early postoperative period, descriptive research is needed to determine predictors of HRQOL in this understudied population. Problem and Purpose: The proposed study identified predictors of global HRQOL, and physical, functional, emotional, and social well-being at one month after HNC surgery. Variables examined as potential predictors included shoulder pain, shoulder function, and functional impairments (disfigurement, and eating, speech, and breathing impairments). Theoretical Framework: The University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing Symptom Management Model was modified and used to guide the study. Methods and Analysis: In this exploratory, cross-sectional study, we examined a convenience sample of 29 patients who had undergone HNC surgery with curative intent one month previously. Global HRQOL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) General Scale, including four well-being subscales. Shoulder pain intensity was measured using the Brief Pain Inventory, shoulder pain distress was measured using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, and functional impairment was measured using the FACIT Head and Neck Subscale. Shoulder function was assessed using a goniometer. Pearson correlations were initially applied to determine correlates (p <0.20) that should be entered in subsequent stepwise regression models. Findings and Implications: The only significant predictor of global HRQOL was eating impairment (B = -0.20, p = 0.02). Predictors of physical well-being were shoulder pain distress (B = -0.10, p = 0.02) and eating impairment (B = 0.27, p = 0.03). Predictors of functional well-being were speech impairment (B = -0.43, p < 0.01) and disfigurement (B = - 0.20, p = 0.02). No significant predictors were found for emotional and social well-being. The findings suggested that patients’ physical and functional well-being can be influenced by eating impairment, shoulder pain distress, speech impairment, or disfigurement at one month after HNC surgery. Nurses need to monitor nutrition intake, provide proper pain management, and collaborate with speech and physical therapists to promote early rehabilitation. A longitudinal study with a larger sample size is warranted to describe needs for multidisciplinary care to improve HQOL after HNC surgery.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Shoulder Pain after Neck Dissection among Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    (2009-11-04T18:53:26Z) Wang, Hsiao-Lan; Keck, Juanita F.; Rawl, Susan M.; Buelow, Janice M.; Mikesky, Alan E.
    Shoulder pain was constantly reported as a problematic symptom causing dysfunction and quality of life interference after neck dissection in head and neck cancer patients. Due to a lack of conceptual framework and inconsistency of instrument selection, a comparison among previous studies was almost impossible, making it difficult to understand the phenomenon. The current study applied the University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing Symptom Management Model. The purposes of the study were to (a) describe the symptom experience of shoulder pain at 1 month after neck dissection, (b) describe the relationships among symptom experience of shoulder pain, functional status, and quality of life, and (c) identify the contextual variables, concurrent symptoms, and/or adherence predicting symptom experience of shoulder pain, functional status, and/or quality of life. This was a descriptive study with a convenience sample of head and neck cancer patients. The data were collected via a medical record review, a self-administered survey, and a physical examination. The data from 29 patients were entered for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and multiple regressions. At 1 month after surgery, 62% of patients reported they had shoulder pain at some point within a week. Their shoulder pain was from mild to moderate. Fifty-nine percent complained that shoulder pain bothered them about the moderated level. In the final model, symptom experience, shoulder pain, was significantly correlated with one outcome, active shoulder abduction, but not the other, total quality of life, generic quality of life, and head and neck quality of life. Active shoulder abduction was significantly correlated with three quality of life measures. Adding significant predictors of symptom experience and outcomes into the final model, there is a potential that the model would be useful to guide treatment strategies. Treatment for myofascial pain of the levator scapulae could relieve shoulder pain after neck dissection and improve head and neck quality of life. Those with level V dissection were high risk populations of developing shoulder pain. Risk factors of quality of life, which were depression, loss of sensation, and radiation would describe how an intervention could change or unchange the patient’s life.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Shoulder Pain, Functional Status, and Health-Related Quality of Life after Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
    (2013-12) Wang, Hsiao-Lan; Keck, Juanita F.; Weaver, Michael T.; Mikesky, Alan; Bunnell, Karen; Buelow, Janice M; Rawl, Susan M.
    Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients experience treatment-related complications that may interfere with health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The purpose of this study was to describe the symptom experience (shoulder pain) and functional status factors that are related to global and domain-specific HRQOL at one month after HNC surgery. In this exploratory study, we examined 29 patients. The outcome variables included global HRQOL as well as physical, functional, emotional, and social well-being. Symptom experience and functional status factors were the independent variables. In the symptom experience variables, shoulder pain distress was negatively associated with physical well-being (R2 = 0.24). Among the functional status variables, eating impairment was negatively related to global HRQOL (R2 = 0.18) and physical well-being (R2 = 0.21). Speaking impairment and impaired body image explained a large amount of the variance in functional well-being (R2 = 0.45). This study provided initial results regarding symptom experience and functional status factors related to poor HRQOL in the early postoperative period for HNC patients.