Browsing by Author "Henderson, Christopher E."
Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Clinical Practice Guideline to Improve Locomotor Function Following Chronic Stroke, Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, and Brain Injury(Wolters Kluwer, 2020-01) Hornby, T. George; Reisman, Darcy S.; Ward, Irene G.; Scheets, Patricia L.; Miller, Allison; Haddad, David; Fox, Emily J.; Fritz, Nora E.; Hawkins, Kelly; Henderson, Christopher E.; Hendron, Kathryn L.; Holleran, Carey L.; Lynskey, James E.; Walter, Amber; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineBackground: Individuals with acute-onset central nervous system (CNS) injury, including stroke, motor incomplete spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury, often experience lasting locomotor deficits, as quantified by decreases in gait speed and distance walked over a specific duration (timed distance). The goal of the present clinical practice guideline was to delineate the relative efficacy of various interventions to improve walking speed and timed distance in ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following these specific diagnoses. Methods: A systematic review of the literature published between 1995 and 2016 was performed in 4 databases for randomized controlled clinical trials focused on these specific patient populations, at least 6 months postinjury and with specific outcomes of walking speed and timed distance. For all studies, specific parameters of training interventions including frequency, intensity, time, and type were detailed as possible. Recommendations were determined on the basis of the strength of the evidence and the potential harm, risks, or costs of providing a specific training paradigm, particularly when another intervention may be available and can provide greater benefit. Results: Strong evidence indicates that clinicians should offer walking training at moderate to high intensities or virtual reality–based training to ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury to improve walking speed or distance. In contrast, weak evidence suggests that strength training, circuit (ie, combined) training or cycling training at moderate to high intensities, and virtual reality–based balance training may improve walking speed and distance in these patient groups. Finally, strong evidence suggests that body weight–supported treadmill training, robotic-assisted training, or sitting/standing balance training without virtual reality should not be performed to improve walking speed or distance in ambulatory individuals greater than 6 months following acute-onset CNS injury to improve walking speed or distance. Discussion: The collective findings suggest that large amounts of task-specific (ie, locomotor) practice may be critical for improvements in walking function, although only at higher cardiovascular intensities or with augmented feedback to increase patient's engagement. Lower-intensity walking interventions or impairment-based training strategies demonstrated equivocal or limited efficacy. Limitations: As walking speed and distance were primary outcomes, the research participants included in the studies walked without substantial physical assistance. This guideline may not apply to patients with limited ambulatory function, where provision of walking training may require substantial physical assistance. Summary: The guideline suggests that task-specific walking training should be performed to improve walking speed and distance in those with acute-onset CNS injury although only at higher intensities or with augmented feedback. Future studies should clarify the potential utility of specific training parameters that lead to improved walking speed and distance in these populations in both chronic and subacute stages following injury. Disclaimer: These recommendations are intended as a guide for clinicians to optimize rehabilitation outcomes for persons with chronic stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury to improve walking speed and distance.Item Contributions of Stepping Intensity and Variability to Mobility in Individuals Poststroke(American Heart Association, 2019-08-22) Hornby, T. George; Henderson, Christopher E.; Plawecki, Abbey; Lucas, Emily; Lotter, Jennifer; Holthus, Molly; Brazg, Gabrielle; Fahey, Meghan; Woodward, Jane; Ardestani, Marzieh; Roth, Elliot J.; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineBackground and Purpose: The amount of task-specific stepping practice provided during rehabilitation post-stroke can influence locomotor recovery, and reflects one aspect of exercise “dose” that can affect the efficacy of specific interventions. Emerging data suggest that markedly increasing the intensity and variability of stepping practice may also be critical, although such strategies are discouraged during traditional rehabilitation. The goal of this study was to determine the individual and combined contributions of intensity and variability of stepping practice to improving walking speed and distance in individuals post-stroke. Methods: This Phase 2, randomized, blinded assessor clinical trial was performed between May 2015-November 2018. Individuals between 18-85 years old with hemiparesis post-stroke of >6 months duration were recruited. Of the 152 individuals screened, 97 were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 training groups, with 90 completing >10 sessions. Interventions consisted of either high intensity stepping (70-80% heart rate [HR] reserve) of variable, difficult stepping tasks (high-variable), high intensity stepping performing only forward walking (high-forward), and low intensity stepping in variable contexts at 30-40% HR reserve (low-variable). Participants received up to 30 sessions over 2 months, with testing at baseline, post-training and a 3-month follow-up. Primary outcomes included walking speeds and timed distance, with secondary measures of dynamic balance, transfers, spatiotemporal kinematics and metabolic measures. Results: All walking gains were significantly greater following either high-intensity group vs low-variable training (all p<0.001) with significant correlations with stepping amount and rate (r=0.48-60; p<0.01). Additional gains in spatiotemporal symmetry were observed with high-intensity training, and balance confidence increased only following high-variable training in individuals with severe impairments. Conclusion: High intensity stepping training resulted in greater improvements in walking ability and gait symmetry than low-intensity training in individuals with chronic stroke, with potential greater improvements in balance confidence.Item Gains in Daily Stepping Activity in People With Chronic Stroke After High-Intensity Gait Training in Variable Contexts(Oxford University Press, 2022) Hornby, T. George; Plawecki, Abbey; Lotter, Jennifer K.; Scofield, Molly E.; Lucas, Emily; Henderson, Christopher E.; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineObjective: Many physical therapist interventions provided to individuals with chronic stroke can lead to gains in gait speed or endurance (eg, 6-Minute Walk Test [6MWT]), although changes in objective measures of participation are not often observed. The goal of this study was to determine the influence of different walking interventions on daily stepping (steps per day) and the contributions of demographic, training, and clinical measures to these changes. Methods: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, steps per day at baseline and changes in steps per day following 1 of 3 locomotor interventions were evaluated in individuals who were ambulatory and >6 months after stroke. Data were collected on 58 individuals who received ≤30 sessions of high-intensity training (HIT) in variable contexts (eg, tasks and environments; n = 19), HIT focused on forward walking (n = 19), or low-intensity variable training (n = 20). Primary outcomes were steps per day at baseline, at post-training, and at a 3-month follow-up, and secondary outcomes were gait speed, 6MWT, balance, and balance confidence. Correlation and regression analyses identified demographic and clinical variables associated with steps per day. Results: Gains in steps per day were observed across all groups combined, with no between-group differences; post hoc within-group analyses revealed significant gains only following HIT in variable contexts. Both HIT groups showed gains in endurance (6MWT), with increases in balance confidence only following HIT in variable contexts. Changes in steps per day were associated primarily with gains in 6MWT, with additional associations with baseline 6MWT, lower-extremity Fugl-Meyer scores, and changes in balance confidence. Conclusion: HIT in variable contexts elicited gains in daily stepping, with changes primarily associated with gains in gait endurance. Impact: Providing HIT in variable contexts appears to improve measures of participation (eg, daily stepping) that may be associated with clinical measures of function. Gains in multiple measures of mobility and participation with HIT in variable contexts may improve the efficiency and value of physical therapy services.Item Improved walking function in laboratory does not guarantee increased community walking in stroke survivors: Potential role of gait biomechanics(Elsevier, 2019-06-25) Ardestani, Marzieh M.; Henderson, Christopher E.; Hornby, T. George; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineReduced daily stepping in stroke survivors may contribute to decreased functional capacity and increased mortality. We investigated the relationships between clinical and biomechanical walking measures that may contribute to changes in daily stepping activity following physical interventions provided to participants with subacute stroke. Following ≤40 rehabilitation sessions, 39 participants were categorized into three groups: responders/retainers increased daily stepping >500 steps/day post-training (POST) without decreases in stepping at 2-6 month follow-up (F/U); responders/non-retainers increased stepping at POST but declined >500 steps/day at F/U; and, non-responders did not change daily stepping from baseline testing (BSL). Gait kinematics and kinetics were evaluated during graded treadmill assessments at BSL and POST. Clinical measures of gait speed, timed walking distance, balance and balance confidence were measured at BSL, POST and F/U. Between-group comparisons and regression analyses were conducted to predict stepping activity from BSL and POST measurements. Baseline and changes in clinical measures of walking demonstrated selective associations with stepping, although kinematic measures appeared to better discriminate responders. Specific measures suggest greater paretic vs non-paretic kinematic changes in responders with training, although greater non-paretic changes predicted greater gains (i.e., smaller declines) in stepping in retainers at F/U. No kinetic variables were primary predictors of changes in stepping activity at POST or F/U. The combined findings indicate specific biomechanical assessments may help differentiate changes in daily stepping activity post-stroke.Item Increasing the Amount and Intensity of Stepping Training During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Improves Locomotor and Non-Locomotor Outcomes(Sage, 2022) Henderson, Christopher E.; Plawecki, Abbey; Lucas, Emily; Lotter, Jennifer K.; Scofield, Molly; Carbone, Angela; Jang, Jeong H.; Hornby, T. George Hornby; FIRST-Indiana team; Baumgartner, Christina; Breuninger, William; England, Emily; Keys, Amanda; Meier, Jennifer; Nobbe, Carolyn; Pylitt, Alison; Shoger, Lindsay; Wilkie, Kelly; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineBackground: The efficacy of traditional rehabilitation interventions to improve locomotion post-stroke, including providing multiple exercises targeting impairments and activity limitations, is uncertain. Emerging evidence rather suggests attempts to prioritize stepping practice at higher cardiovascular intensities may facilitate greater locomotor outcomes. Objective: The present study was designed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of high-intensity training (HIT) to usual care during inpatient rehabilitation post-stroke. Methods: Changes in stepping activity and functional outcomes were compared over 9 months during usual-care (n = 131 patients < 2 months post-stroke), during an 18-month transition phase with attempts to implement HIT (n = 317), and over 12 months following HIT implementation (n = 208). The transition phase began with didactic and hands-on education, and continued with meetings, mentoring, and audit and feedback. Fidelity metrics included percentage of sessions prioritizing gait interventions and documenting intensity. Demographics, training measures, and outcomes were compared across phases using linear or logistic regression analysis, Kruskal-Wallis tests, or χ2 analysis. Results: Across all phases, admission scores were similar except for balance (usual-care>HIT; P < .02). Efforts to prioritize stepping and achieve targeted intensities during HIT vs transition or usual-care phases led to increased steps/day (P < .01). During HIT, gains in 10-m walk [HIT median = 0.13 m/s (interquartile range: 0-0.35) vs usual-care = 0.07 m/s (0-0.24), P = .01] and 6-min walk [50 (9.3-116) vs 2.1 (0-56) m, P < .01] were observed, with additional improvements in transfers and stair-climbing. Conclusions: Greater efforts to prioritize walking and reach higher intensities during HIT led to increased steps/day, resulting in greater gains in locomotor and non-locomotor outcomes.Item Kinematic and Neuromuscular Adaptations in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury after High- versus Low-Intensity Locomotor Training(Mary Ann Liebert, 2019-05-28) Ardestani, Marzieh M.; Henderson, Christopher E.; Salehi, Seyed H.; Mahtani, Gordhan B.; Schmit, Brian D.; Hornby, T. George; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineRecent data demonstrate improved locomotion with high-intensity locomotor training (LT) in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), although concerns remain regarding reinforcement of abnormal motor strategies. The present study evaluated the effects of LT intensity on kinematic and neuromuscular coordination in individuals with iSCI. Using a randomized, crossover design, participants with iSCI received up to 20 sessions of high-intensity LT, with attempts to achieve 70–85% of age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax), or low-intensity LT (50–65% HRmax), following which the other intervention was performed. Specific measures included spatiotemporal variables, sagittal-plane gait kinematics, and neuromuscular synergies from electromyographic (EMG) recordings. Correlation analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between variables. Significant improvements in sagittal-plane joint excursions and intralimb hip-knee coordination were observed following high- but not low-intensity LT when comparing peak treadmill (TM) speed before and after LT. Neuromuscular complexity (i.e., number of synergies to explain >90% of EMG variance) was also increased following high- but not low-intensity LT. Comparison of speed-matched trials confirmed significant improvements in the knee excursion of the less impaired limb and intralimb hip-knee coordination, as well as improvements in neuromuscular complexity following high-intensity LT. These findings suggest greater neuromuscular complexity may be due to LT and not necessarily differences in speeds. Only selected kinematic changes (i.e., weak hip excursion) was correlated to improvements in treadmill speed. In conclusion, LT intensity can facilitate gains in kinematic variables and neuromuscular synergies in individuals with iSCI.Item Locomotor Kinematics and Kinetics Following High-Intensity Stepping Training in Variable Contexts Poststroke(SAGE, 2020-06-06) Ardestani, Marzieh M.; Henderson, Christopher E.; Mahtani, Gordhan; Connolly, Mark; Hornby, T. George; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineBackground and Purpose Previous studies suggest individuals post-stroke can achieve substantial gains in walking function following high-intensity locomotor training (LT). Recent findings also indicate practice of variable stepping tasks targeting locomotor deficits can mitigate selected impairments underlying reduced walking speeds. The goal of this study was to investigate alterations in locomotor biomechanics following three different LT paradigms. Methods This secondary analysis of a randomized trial recruited individuals 18–85 years old and >6 months post-stroke. We compared changes in spatiotemporal, joint kinematics and kinetics following up to 30 sessions of high-intensity (>70% heart rate reserve [HRR]) LT of variable tasks targeting paretic limb and balance impairments (high-variable, HV), high-intensity LT focused only on forward walking (high-forward, HF), or low-intensity LT (<40% HRR) of variable tasks (low-variable, LV). Sagittal spatiotemporal and joint kinematics, and concentric joint powers were compared between groups. Regressions and principle component (PC) analyses were conducted to evaluate relative contributions or importance of biomechanical changes to between and within groups. Results Biomechanical data were available on 50 participants who could walk ≥0.1 m/s on a motorized treadmill. Significant differences in spatiotemporal parameters, kinematic consistency, and kinetics were observed between HV and HF vs LV. Resultant PC analyses were characterized by paretic powers and kinematic consistency following HV, while HF and LV were characterized by non-paretic powers. Conclusion High-intensity LT results in greater changes in kinematics and kinetics as compared to lower-intensity interventions. The results may suggest greater paretic-limb contributions with high-intensity variable stepping training that targets specific biomechanical deficits.Item Predicting Discharge Walking Function With High-Intensity Stepping Training During Inpatient Rehabilitation in Nonambulatory Patients Poststroke(Elsevier, 2020) Henderson, Christopher E.; Fahey, Megan; Brazg, Gabi; Moore, Jennifer L.; Hornby, T. George; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineObjective This cohort investigation identified primary predictors of discharge walking function of nonambulatory individuals poststroke with high-intensity training (HIT) during inpatient rehabilitation. Design Observational cohort investigation. Setting Inpatient rehabilitation. Participants Data were collected from individuals (N=257) <6 months poststroke who required assistance to walk at admission. Intervention Clinical physical therapy interventions attempted to maximize stepping practice at higher intensities. Main Outcome Measures Primary outcomes included the discharge level of assistance required during walking (minimal or no assistance) and attainment of specific gait speed thresholds (0.4 and 0.8 m/s) during the 10-m walk test. Independent predictors were demographics, training interventions (including steps/day), baseline Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and paretic leg strength. Results Participants performed a median (interquartile range) of 1270 (533-2297) steps per day throughout inpatient rehabilitation, with significant differences between those who walked with versus without assistance at discharge. Logistic regressions indicate steps per day was a primary predictor of unassisted walking recovery; removal of steps per day resulted in primary predictors of baseline BBS and strength. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses indicate significant areas under the curve for BBS and relatively low cutoff scores of 5.5 points at admission to walk without assistance at any speed. ROC analyses performed using 1-week outcomes indicate BBS scores of 5-17 points were needed to achieve locomotor thresholds. Conclusion Stepping activity, BBS, and paretic leg strength were primary predictors of walking outcomes in patients performing HIT, and ROC analyses indicated recovery of independent walking could be achieved in low functioning patients early poststroke.Item Step Monitor Accuracy During PostStroke Physical Therapy and Simulated Activities(Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Henderson, Christopher E.; Toth, Lindsay; Kaplan, Andrew; Hornby, T. George; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineIntroduction/purpose: The amount of stepping activity during rehabilitation post-stroke can predict walking outcomes, although the most accurate methods to evaluate stepping activity are uncertain with conflicting findings on available stepping monitors during walking assessments. Rehabilitation sessions also include non-stepping activities and the ability of activity monitors to differentiate these activities from stepping is unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the accuracy of different activity monitors worn by individuals post-stroke with variable walking speeds during clinical physical therapy (PT) and research interventions focused on walking. Methods: In Part I, 28 participants post-stroke wore a StepWatch, ActiGraph with and without a Low Frequency Extension (LFE) filter, and Fitbit on paretic and non-paretic distal shanks at or above the ankle during clinical PT or research interventions with steps simultaneously hand counted. Mean absolute percent errors were compared between limbs and tasks performed. In Part II, 12 healthy adults completed 8 walking and 9 non-walking tasks observed during clinical PT or research. Data were descriptively analyzed and used to assist interpretation of Part I results. Results: Part I results indicate most devices did not demonstrate an optimal limb configuration during research sessions focused on walking, with larger errors during clinical PT on the non-paretic limb. Using the limb that minimized errors for each device, the StepWatch had smaller errors than the ActiGraph and Fitbit (p<0.01), particularly in those who walked < 0.8 m/s. Conversely, errors from the ActiGraph-LFE demonstrated inconsistent differences in step counts between Fitbit and ActiGraph. Part II results indicate that errors observed during different stepping and non-stepping activities were often device-specific, with non-stepping tasks frequently detected as stepping. Conclusions: The StepWatch and ActiGraph-LFE had smaller errors than the Fitbit or ActiGraph, with greater errors in those walking at slower speeds. Inclusion of non-stepping activities affected step counts and should be considered when measuring stepping activity in individuals post-stroke to predict locomotor outcomes following rehabilitation.Item Stepwise Regression and Latent Profile Analyses of Locomotor Outcomes Poststroke(American Heart Association, 2020-10) Hornby, T. George; Henderson, Christopher E.; Holleran, Carey L.; Lovell, Linda; Roth, Elliot J.; Jang, Jeong Hoon; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of MedicineBackground and purpose: Previous data suggest patient demographics and clinical presentation are primary predictors of motor recovery poststroke, with minimal contributions of physical interventions. Other studies indicate consistent associations between the amount and intensity of stepping practice with locomotor outcomes. The goal of this study was to determine the relative contributions of these combined variables to locomotor outcomes poststroke across a range of patient demographics and baseline function. Methods: Data were pooled from 3 separate trials evaluating the efficacy of high-intensity training, low-intensity training, and conventional interventions. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and training activities from 144 participants >1-month poststroke were included in stepwise regression analyses to determine their relative contributions to locomotor outcomes. Subsequent latent profile analyses evaluated differences in classes of participants based on their responses to interventions. Results: Stepwise regressions indicate primary contributions of stepping activity on locomotor outcomes, with additional influences of age, duration poststroke, and baseline function. Latent profile analyses revealed 2 main classes of outcomes, with the largest gains in those who received high-intensity training and achieved the greatest amounts of stepping practice. Regression and latent profile analyses of only high-intensity training participants indicated age, baseline function, and training activities were primary determinants of locomotor gains. Participants with the smallest gains were older (≈60 years), presented with slower gait speeds (<0.40 m/s), and performed 600 to 1000 less steps/session. Conclusions: Regression and cluster analyses reveal primary contributions of training interventions on mobility outcomes in patients >1-month poststroke. Age, duration poststroke, and baseline impairments were secondary predictors.