Browsing by Author "Glazer, Kara"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Clinical predictors of non-response to lithium treatment in the Pharmacogenomics of Bipolar Disorder (PGBD) study
    (Wiley, 2021) Lin, Yian; Maihofer, Adam X.; Stapp, Emma; Ritchey, Megan; Alliey‐Rodriguez, Ney; Anand, Amit; Balaraman, Yokesh; Berrettini, Wade H.; Bertram, Holli; Bhattacharjee, Abesh; Calkin, Cynthia V.; Conroy, Carla; Coryell, William; D'Arcangelo, Nicole; DeModena, Anna; Biernacka, Joanna M.; Fisher, Carrie; Frazier, Nicole; Frye, Mark; Gao, Keming; Garnham, Julie; Gershon, Elliot; Glazer, Kara; Goes, Fernando S.; Goto, Toyomi; Karberg, Elizabeth; Harrington, Gloria; Jakobsen, Petter; Kamali, Masoud; Kelly, Marisa; Leckband, Susan G.; Lohoff, Falk W.; Stautland, Andrea; McCarthy, Michael J.; McInnis, Melvin G.; Mondimore, Francis; Morken, Gunnar; Nurnberger, John I.; Oedegaard, Ketil J.; Syrstad, Vigdis Elin Giever; Ryan, Kelly; Schinagle, Martha; Schoeyen, Helle; Andreassen, Ole A.; Shaw, Marth; Shilling, Paul D.; Slaney, Claire; Tarwater, Bruce; Calabrese, Joseph R.; Alda, Martin; Nievergelt, Caroline M.; Zandi, Peter P.; Kelsoe, John R.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Background Lithium is regarded as a first-line treatment for bipolar disorder (BD), but partial response and non-response commonly occurs. There exists a need to identify lithium non-responders prior to initiating treatment. The Pharmacogenomics of Bipolar Disorder (PGBD) Study was designed to identify predictors of lithium response. Methods The PGBD Study was an eleven site prospective trial of lithium treatment in bipolar I disorder. Subjects were stabilized on lithium monotherapy over 4 months and gradually discontinued from all other psychotropic medications. After ensuring a sustained clinical remission (defined by a score of ≤3 on the CGI for 4 weeks) had been achieved, subjects were followed for up to 2 years to monitor clinical response. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the relationship between clinical measures and time until failure to remit or relapse. Results A total of 345 individuals were enrolled into the study and included in the analysis. Of these, 101 subjects failed to remit or relapsed, 88 achieved remission and continued to study completion, and 156 were terminated from the study for other reasons. Significant clinical predictors of treatment failure (p < 0.05) included baseline anxiety symptoms, functional impairments, negative life events and lifetime clinical features such as a history of migraine, suicidal ideation/attempts, and mixed episodes, as well as a chronic course of illness. Conclusions In this PGBD Study of lithium response, several clinical features were found to be associated with failure to respond to lithium. Future validation is needed to confirm these clinical predictors of treatment failure and their use clinically to distinguish who will do well on lithium before starting pharmacotherapy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    National Network of Depression Centers' Recommendations on Harmonizing Clinical Documentation of Electroconvulsive Therapy
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2022) Zandi, Peter P.; Morreale, Michael; Reti, Irving M.; Maixner, Daniel F.; McDonald, William M.; Patel, Paresh D.; Achtyes, Eric; Bhati, Mahendra T.; Carr, Brent R.; Conroy, Susan K.; Cristancho, Mario; Dubin, Marc J.; Francis, Andrew; Glazer, Kara; Ingram, Wendy; Khurshid, Khurshid; McClintock, Shawn M.; Pinjari, Omar F.; Reeves, Kevin; Rodriguez, Nelson F.; Sampson, Shirlene; Seiner, Stephen J.; Selek, Salih; Sheline, Yvette; Smetana, Roy W.; Soda, Takahiro; Trapp, Nicholas T.; Wright, Jesse H.; Husain, Mustafa; Weiner, Richard D.; Psychiatry, School of Medicine
    Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly therapeutic and cost-effective treatment for severe and/or treatment-resistant major depression. However, because of the varied clinical practices, there is a great deal of heterogeneity in how ECT is delivered and documented. This represents both an opportunity to study how differences in implementation influence clinical outcomes and a challenge for carrying out coordinated quality improvement and research efforts across multiple ECT centers. The National Network of Depression Centers, a consortium of 26+ US academic medical centers of excellence providing care for patients with mood disorders, formed a task group with the goals of promoting best clinical practices for the delivery of ECT and to facilitate large-scale, multisite quality improvement and research to advance more effective and safe use of this treatment modality. The National Network of Depression Centers Task Group on ECT set out to define best practices for harmonizing the clinical documentation of ECT across treatment centers to promote clinical interoperability and facilitate a nationwide collaboration that would enable multisite quality improvement and longitudinal research in real-world settings. This article reports on the work of this effort. It focuses on the use of ECT for major depressive disorder, which accounts for the majority of ECT referrals in most countries. However, most of the recommendations on clinical documentation proposed herein will be applicable to the use of ECT for any of its indications.