Browsing by Author "Girda, Eugenia"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A phase I study of talazoparib (BMN 673) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCI9782)
    (Wiley, 2022) Leal, Ticiana A.; Sharifi, Marina N.; Chan, Nancy; Wesolowski, Robert; Turk, Anita A.; Bruce, Justine Y.; O'Regan, Ruth M.; Eickhoff, Jens; Barroilhet, Lisa M.; Malhotra, Jyoti; Mehnert, Janice; Girda, Eugenia; Wiley, Elizabeth; Schmitz, Natalie; Andrews, Shannon; Liu, Glenn; Wisinski, Kari B.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins potentiate antitumor activity of platinum chemotherapy. This study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of PARP inhibitor talazoparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Methods: We conducted a phase I study of talazoparib with carboplatin AUC5-6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 of 21-day cycles in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients enrolled using a 3 + 3 design in two cohorts with talazoparib for 7 (schedule A) or 3 days (schedule B). After induction with 4-6 cycles of triplet therapy, patients received one of three maintenance options: (a) continuation of triplet (b) carboplatin/talazoparib, or (c) talazoparib monotherapy. Results: Forty-three patients were treated. The MTD for both schedules was talazoparib 250mcg daily. The main toxicity was myelosuppression including grade 3/4 hematologic treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Dose modification occurred in 87% and 100% of patients for schedules A and B, respectively. Discontinuation due to TRAEs was 13% in schedule A and 10% in B. Ten out of 22 evaluable patients in schedule A and 5/16 patients in schedule B had a complete or partial response. Twelve out of 43 patients received ≥6 cycles of talazoparib after induction, with a 13-month median duration of maintenance. Conclusion: We have established the recommended phase II dose of Talazoparib at 250mcg on a 3- or 7-day schedule with carboplatin AUC6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 of 21-day cycles. This regimen is associated with significant myelosuppression, and in addition to maximizing supportive care, modification of the chemotherapy component would be a consideration for further development of this combination with the schedules investigated in this study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A phase I study of talazoparib (BMN 673) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCI9782)
    (Wiley, 2022-11) Leal, Ticiana A.; Sharifi, Marina N.; Chan, Nancy; Wesolowski, Robert; Turk, Anita A.; Bruce, Justine Y.; O'Regan, Ruth M.; Eickhoff, Jens; Barroilhet, Lisa M.; Malhotra, Jyoti; Mehnert, Janice; Girda, Eugenia; Wiley, Elizabeth; Schmitz, Natalie; Andrews, Shannon; Liu, Glenn; Wisinski, Kari B.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Inhibitors of poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins potentiate antitumor activity of platinum chemotherapy. This study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of PARP inhibitor talazoparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Methods We conducted a phase I study of talazoparib with carboplatin AUC5‐6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 of 21‐day cycles in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients enrolled using a 3 + 3 design in two cohorts with talazoparib for 7 (schedule A) or 3 days (schedule B). After induction with 4–6 cycles of triplet therapy, patients received one of three maintenance options: (a) continuation of triplet (b) carboplatin/talazoparib, or (c) talazoparib monotherapy. Results Forty‐three patients were treated. The MTD for both schedules was talazoparib 250mcg daily. The main toxicity was myelosuppression including grade 3/4 hematologic treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs). Dose modification occurred in 87% and 100% of patients for schedules A and B, respectively. Discontinuation due to TRAEs was 13% in schedule A and 10% in B. Ten out of 22 evaluable patients in schedule A and 5/16 patients in schedule B had a complete or partial response. Twelve out of 43 patients received ≥6 cycles of talazoparib after induction, with a 13‐month median duration of maintenance. Conclusion We have established the recommended phase II dose of Talazoparib at 250mcg on a 3‐ or 7‐day schedule with carboplatin AUC6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 of 21‐day cycles. This regimen is associated with significant myelosuppression, and in addition to maximizing supportive care, modification of the chemotherapy component would be a consideration for further development of this combination with the schedules investigated in this study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Translational randomized phase II trial of cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab in advanced, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer
    (BMJ, 2022-03) Lheureux, Stephanie; Matei, Daniela E.; Konstantinopoulos, Panagiotis A.; Wang, Ben X.; Gadalla, Ramy; Block, Matthew S.; Jewell, Andrea; Gaillard, Stephanie L.; McHale, Michael; McCourt, Carolyn; Temkin, Sarah; Girda, Eugenia; Backes, Floor J.; Werner, Theresa L.; Duska, Linda; Kehoe, Siobhan; Colombo, Ilaria; Wang, Lisa; Li, Xuan; Wildman, Rachel; Soleimani, Shirin; Lien, Scott; Wright, John; Pugh, Trevor; Ohashi, Pamela S.; Brooks, David G.; Fleming, Gini F.; Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
    Background Combining immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents is a promising treatment strategy in endometrial cancer. To date, no biomarkers for response have been identified and data on post-immunotherapy progression are lacking. We explored the combination of a checkpoint inhibitor (nivolumab) and an antiangiogenic agent (cabozantinib) in immunotherapy-naïve endometrial cancer and in patients whose disease progressed on previous immunotherapy with baseline biopsy for immune profiling. Patients and methods In this phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03367741, registered December 11, 2017), women with recurrent endometrial cancer were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab with cabozantinib (Arm A) or nivolumab alone (Arm B). The primary endpoint was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-defined progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with carcinosarcoma or prior immune checkpoint inhibitor received combination treatment (Arm C). Baseline biopsy and serial peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were analyzed and associations between patient outcome and immune data from cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) and PBMCs were explored. Results Median PFS was 5.3 (90% CI 3.5 to 9.2) months in Arm A (n=36) and 1.9 (90% CI 1.6 to 3.4) months in Arm B (n=18) (HR=0.59, 90% CI 0.35 to 0.98; log-rank p=0.09, meeting the prespecified statistical significance criteria). The most common treatment-related adverse events in Arm A were diarrhea (50%) and elevated liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase 47%, alanine aminotransferase 42%). In-depth baseline CyTOF analysis across treatment arms (n=40) identified 35 immune-cell subsets. Among immunotherapy-pretreated patients in Arm C, non-progressors had significantly higher proportions of activated tissue-resident (CD103+CD69+) ɣδ T cells than progressors (adjusted p=0.009). Conclusions Adding cabozantinib to nivolumab significantly improved outcomes in heavily pretreated endometrial cancer. A subgroup of immunotherapy-pretreated patients identified by baseline immune profile and potentially benefiting from combination with antiangiogenics requires further investigation.