Browsing by Author "Fountzilas, Christos"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A phase I study of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor ceritinib in combination with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors
    (Wiley, 2021) Fountzilas, Christos; Adjei, Alex; Opyrchal, Mateusz; Evans, Rachel; Ghasemi, Mohammad; Attwood, Kristopher; Groman, Adrienne; Bshara, Wiam; Goey, Andrew; Wilton, John; Ma, Wen Wee; Iyer, Renuka; Medicine, School of Medicine
    In this phase I, dose-escalation study, we sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase/c-ROS oncogene 1 receptor (ALK/ROS1) inhibitor ceritinib in combination with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives were characterization of the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of these combinations, and identification of potential biomarkers of efficacy. Ceritinib was combined with gemcitabine (Arm 1), gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Arm 2) or gemcitabine/cisplatin (Arm 3). Drug concentrations in plasma were measured by tandem mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS/MS). We analyzed archival tumor tissue for ALK, ROS1, hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-MET) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) expression by immunohistochemistry. Arm 2 closed early secondary to toxicity. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). There was one DLT in Arm 1 (grade 3 ALT increase) and three DLTs in Arm 3 (grade 3 acute renal failure, grade 3 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 dyspnea). The MTD of ceritinib was determined to be 600 mg (Arm 1) and 450 mg orally daily (Arm 3). Main toxicities were hematologic, constitutional and gastrointestinal as expected by the chemotherapy backbone. The apparent clearance for ceritinib decreased substantially after repeated dosing; cisplatin did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of ceritinib. The overall response rate was 20%; the median progression-free survival was 4.8 months. Three out of five response-evaluable cholangiocarcinoma patients had clinical benefit. Increased expression of c-MET was associated with a lack of clinical benefit. Ceritinib in combination with gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin has a manageable toxicity profile. Further development of this strategy in tumors with ALK or ROS1 fusions is warranted.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of niraparib in patients with previously treated homologous recombination defective metastatic esophageal/gastroesophageal junction/proximal gastric adenocarcinoma
    (Frontiers Media, 2024-11-21) Khalid, Ahmed Bilal; Fountzilas, Christos; Burney, Heather N.; Mamdani, Hirva; Schneider, Bryan P.; Fausel, Christopher; Perkins, Susan M.; Jalal, Shadia; Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
    Introduction: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains a devastating disease and second line treatment options in the metastatic space are limited. Homologous recombination (HR) defects have been described in EAC in up to 40% of patients. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)1 and PARP2 inhibitors have shown efficacy in HR defective prostate and ovarian cancers. Here, we describe the activity of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in metastatic EAC with HR defects. Methods: In this single arm Simon two-stage Phase II study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of niraparib in patients with metastatic EAC previously treated with platinum containing chemotherapy harboring defective HR. Defective HR was defined as deleterious alterations in the following HR genes: BRCA1/2, PALB2, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54L, NBN, ARID1A and GEN1. Results: 14 patients were enrolled in this study. The trial was stopped early due to slow accrual. 3 patients did not have post-treatment scans because of rapid clinical decline. The overall response rate (ORR) (95% exact CI) was 0/11 = 0% (0%, 28.49%). The disease control rate (DCR) (95% exact CI) was 2/11 = 18.2% (2.3%, 51.8%). The median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI = 1.0-3.7). The median OS for evaluable patients was 6.6 months (95% CI =2.7-11.4) and 5.7 months for all patients (95% CI =2.7-10.1). The most common adverse events seen were anemia, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusion: In patients with metastatic EAC, single agent niraparib as second line therapy is not an effective option.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Augmenting antibody response to EGF-depleting immunotherapy: Findings from a phase I trial of CIMAvax-EGF in combination with nivolumab in advanced stage NSCLC
    (Frontiers Media, 2022-08-03) Evans, Rachel; Lee, Kelvin; Wallace, Paul K.; Reid, Mary; Muhitch, Jason; Dozier, Askia; Mesa, Circe; Luaces, Patricia L.; Santos-Morales, Orestes; Groman, Adrienne; Cedeno, Carlos; Cinquino, Aileen; Fisher, Daniel T.; Puzanov, Igor; Opyrchal, Mateusz; Fountzilas, Christos; Dai, Tong; Ernstoff, Marc; Attwood, Kristopher; Hutson, Alan; Johnson, Candace; Mazorra, Zaima; Saavedra, Danay; Leon, Kalet; Lage, Agustin; Crombet, Tania; Dy, Grace K.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: CIMAvax-EGF is an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-depleting immunotherapy which has shown survival benefit as a switch maintenance treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective of this trial is to establish the safety and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of CIMAvax-EGF in combination with nivolumab as second-line therapy for NSCLC. Methods: Patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive metastatic NSCLC were enrolled using a "3+3" dose-escalation design. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE V4.03. Thirteen patients (one unevaluable), the majority with PD-L1 0%, were enrolled into two dose levels of CIMAvax-EGF. Findings: The combination was determined to be safe and tolerable. The recommended phase 2 dose of CIMAvax-EGF was 2.4 mg. Humoral response to CIMAvax-EGF was achieved earlier and in a greater number of patients with the combination compared to historical control. Four out of 12 evaluable patients had an objective response.