Browsing by Author "Elsey, Amanda R."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multisite Investigation of Outcomes With Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    (Elsevier, 2018-01-22) Cavallari, Larisa H.; Lee, Craig R.; Beitelshees, Amber L.; Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M.; Duarte, Julio D.; Voora, Deepak; Kimmel, Stephen E.; McDonough, Caitrin W.; Gong, Yan; Dave, Chintan V.; Pratt, Victoria M.; Alestock, Tameka D.; Anderson, R. David; Alsip, Jorge; Ardati, Amer K.; Brott, Brigitta C.; Brown, Lawrence; Chumnumwat, Supatat; Clare-Salzler, Michael J.; Coons, James C.; Denny, Joshua C.; Dillon, Chrisly; Elsey, Amanda R.; Hamadeh, Issam; Harada, Shuko; Hillegass, William B.; Hines, Lindsay; Horenstein, Richard B.; Howell, Lucius A.; Jeng, Linda J.B.; Kelemen, Mark D.; Lee, Y.M.; Magvanjav, Oyunbileg; Montasser, May; Nelson, David R.; Nutescu, Edith A.; Nwaba, Devon C.; Pakyz, Ruth E.; Palmer, Kathleen; Peterson, Josh F.; Pollin, Toni I.; Quinn, Alison H.; Robinson, Shawn W.; Schub, Jamie; Skaar, Todd C.; Smith, Donald M.; Sriramoju, Vindhya B.; Starostik, Petr; Stys, Tomasz P.; Stevenson, James M.; Varunok, Nicholas; Vesely, Mark R.; Wake, Dyson T.; Weck, Karen E.; Weitzel, Kristin W.; Wilke, Russell A.; Willig, James; Zhao, Richard Y.; Kreutz, Rolf P.; Stouffer, George A.; Empey, Philip E.; Limdi, Nita A.; Shuldiner, Alan R.; Winterstein, Almut G.; Johnson, Julie A.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine
    OBJECTIVES: This multicenter pragmatic investigation assessed outcomes following clinical implementation of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles impair clopidogrel effectiveness after PCI. METHODS: After clinical genotyping, each institution recommended alternative antiplatelet therapy (prasugrel, ticagrelor) in PCI patients with a loss-of-function allele. Major adverse cardiovascular events (defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, or death) within 12 months of PCI were compared between patients with a loss-of-function allele prescribed clopidogrel versus alternative therapy. Risk was also compared between patients without a loss-of-function allele and loss-of-function allele carriers prescribed alternative therapy. Cox regression was performed, adjusting for group differences with inverse probability of treatment weights. RESULTS: Among 1,815 patients, 572 (31.5%) had a loss-of-function allele. The risk for major adverse cardiovascular events was significantly higher in patients with a loss-of-function allele prescribed clopidogrel versus alternative therapy (23.4 vs. 8.7 per 100 patient-years; adjusted hazard ratio: 2.26; 95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 4.32; p = 0.013). Similar results were observed among 1,210 patients with acute coronary syndromes at the time of PCI (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.35 to 6.09; p = 0.013). There was no difference in major adverse cardiovascular events between patients without a loss-of-function allele and loss-of-function allele carriers prescribed alternative therapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 1.88; p = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: These data from real-world observations demonstrate a higher risk for cardiovascular events in patients with a CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele if clopidogrel versus alternative therapy is prescribed. A future randomized study of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy may be of value.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Physician-Reported Benefits and Barriers to Clinical Implementation of Genomic Medicine: A Multi-Site IGNITE-Network Survey
    (MDPI, 2018-07-24) Obeng, Aniwaa Owusu; Fei, Kezhen; Levy, Kenneth D.; Elsey, Amanda R.; Pollin, Toni I.; Ramirez, Andrea H.; Weitzel, Kristin W.; Horowitz, Carol R.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Genetic medicine is one of the key components of personalized medicine, but adoption in clinical practice is still limited. To understand potential barriers and provider attitudes, we surveyed 285 physicians from five Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) sites about their perceptions as to the clinical utility of genetic data as well as their preparedness to integrate it into practice. These responses were also analyzed in comparison to the type of study occurring at the physicians' institution (pharmacogenetics versus disease genetics). The majority believed that genetic testing is clinically useful; however, only a third believed that they had obtained adequate training to care for genetically "high-risk" patients. Physicians involved in pharmacogenetics initiatives were more favorable towards genetic testing applications; they found it to be clinically useful and felt more prepared and confident in their abilities to adopt it into their practice in comparison to those participating in disease genetics initiatives. These results suggest that investigators should explore which attributes of clinical pharmacogenetics (such as the use of simplified genetics-guided recommendations) can be implemented to improve attitudes and preparedness to implement disease genetics in care. Most physicians felt unprepared to use genetic information in their practice; accordingly, major steps should be taken to develop effective clinical tools and training strategies for physicians.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Strategies to Integrate Genomic Medicine into Clinical Care: Evidence from the IGNITE Network
    (MDPI, 2021-07-08) Sperber, Nina R.; Dong, Olivia M.; Roberts, Megan C.; Dexter, Paul; Elsey, Amanda R.; Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.; Horowitz, Carol R.; Johnson, Julie A.; Levy, Kenneth D.; Ong, Henry; Peterson, Josh F.; Pollin, Toni I.; Rakhra-Burris, Tejinder; Ramos, Michelle A.; Skaar, Todd C.; Orlando, Lori A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    The complexity of genomic medicine can be streamlined by implementing some form of clinical decision support (CDS) to guide clinicians in how to use and interpret personalized data; however, it is not yet clear which strategies are best suited for this purpose. In this study, we used implementation science to identify common strategies for applying provider-based CDS interventions across six genomic medicine clinical research projects funded by an NIH consortium. Each project’s strategies were elicited via a structured survey derived from a typology of implementation strategies, the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC), and follow-up interviews guided by both implementation strategy reporting criteria and a planning framework, RE-AIM, to obtain more detail about implementation strategies and desired outcomes. We found that, on average, the three pharmacogenomics implementation projects used more strategies than the disease-focused projects. Overall, projects had four implementation strategies in common; however, operationalization of each differed in accordance with each study’s implementation outcomes. These four common strategies may be important for precision medicine program implementation, and pharmacogenomics may require more integration into clinical care. Understanding how and why these strategies were successfully employed could be useful for others implementing genomic or precision medicine programs in different contexts.