Browsing by Author "Cohen, Harvey Jay"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Associating persistent self-reported cognitive decline with neurocognitive decline in older breast cancer survivors using machine learning: The Thinking and Living with Cancer study(Elsevier, 2022-11) Van Dyk, Kathleen; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhou, Xingtao; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim A.; Bethea, Traci N.; Carroll, Judith E.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Dilawari, Asma A.; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nakamura, Zev M.; Patel, Sunita K.; Rentscher, Kelly E.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Small, Brent J.; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Root, James C.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineIntroduction: Many cancer survivors report cognitive problems following diagnosis and treatment. However, the clinical significance of patient-reported cognitive symptoms early in survivorship can be unclear. We used a machine learning approach to determine the association of persistent self-reported cognitive symptoms two years after diagnosis and neurocognitive test performance in a prospective cohort of older breast cancer survivors. Materials and Methods: We enrolled breast cancer survivors with non-metastatic disease (n=435) and age- and education-matched non-cancer controls (n=441) between August 2010 and December 2017 and followed until January 2020; we excluded women with neurological disease and all women passed a cognitive screen at enrollment. Women completed the FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) scale and neurocognitive tests of attention, processing speed, executive function, learning, memory and visuospatial ability, and timed activities of daily living assessments at enrollment (pre-systemic treatment) and annually to 24 months, for a total of 59 individual neurocognitive measures. We defined persistent self-reported cognitive decline as clinically meaningful decline (3.7+ points) on the PCI scale from enrollment to twelve months with persistence to 24 months. Analysis used four machine learning models based on data for change scores (baseline to twelve months) on the 59 neurocognitive measures and measures of depression, anxiety, and fatigue to determine a set of variables that distinguished the 24-month persistent cognitive decline group from non-cancer controls or from survivors without decline. Results: The sample of survivors and controls ranged in age from were ages 60–89. Thirty-three percent of survivors had self-reported cognitive decline at twelve months and two-thirds continued to have persistent decline to 24 months (n=60). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) models distinguished survivors with persistent self-reported declines from controls (AUC=0.736) and survivors without decline (n=147; AUC=0.744). The variables that separated groups were predominantly neurocognitive test performance change scores, including declines in list learning, verbal fluency, and attention measures. Discussion: Machine learning may be useful to further our understanding of cancer-related cognitive decline. Our results suggest that persistent self-reported cognitive problems among older women with breast cancer are associated with a constellation of mild neurocognitive changes warranting clinical attention.Item Associating Persistent Self-Reported Cognitive Decline with Neurocognitive Decline in Older Breast Cancer Survivors Using Machine Learning: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study(Elsevier, 2022) Van Dyk, Kathleen; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhou, Xingtao; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim A.; Bethea, Traci N.; Carroll, Judith E.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Dilawari, Asma A.; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nakamura, Zev M.; Patel, Sunita K.; Rentscher, Kelly E.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Small, Brent J.; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Root, James C.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineIntroduction: Many cancer survivors report cognitive problems following diagnosis and treatment. However, the clinical significance of patient-reported cognitive symptoms early in survivorship can be unclear. We used a machine learning approach to determine the association of persistent self-reported cognitive symptoms two years after diagnosis and neurocognitive test performance in a prospective cohort of older breast cancer survivors. Materials and methods: We enrolled breast cancer survivors with non-metastatic disease (n = 435) and age- and education-matched non-cancer controls (n = 441) between August 2010 and December 2017 and followed until January 2020; we excluded women with neurological disease and all women passed a cognitive screen at enrollment. Women completed the FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) scale and neurocognitive tests of attention, processing speed, executive function, learning, memory and visuospatial ability, and timed activities of daily living assessments at enrollment (pre-systemic treatment) and annually to 24 months, for a total of 59 individual neurocognitive measures. We defined persistent self-reported cognitive decline as clinically meaningful decline (3.7+ points) on the PCI scale from enrollment to twelve months with persistence to 24 months. Analysis used four machine learning models based on data for change scores (baseline to twelve months) on the 59 neurocognitive measures and measures of depression, anxiety, and fatigue to determine a set of variables that distinguished the 24-month persistent cognitive decline group from non-cancer controls or from survivors without decline. Results: The sample of survivors and controls ranged in age from were ages 60-89. Thirty-three percent of survivors had self-reported cognitive decline at twelve months and two-thirds continued to have persistent decline to 24 months (n = 60). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) models distinguished survivors with persistent self-reported declines from controls (AUC = 0.736) and survivors without decline (n = 147; AUC = 0.744). The variables that separated groups were predominantly neurocognitive test performance change scores, including declines in list learning, verbal fluency, and attention measures. Discussion: Machine learning may be useful to further our understanding of cancer-related cognitive decline. Our results suggest that persistent self-reported cognitive problems among older women with breast cancer are associated with a constellation of mild neurocognitive changes warranting clinical attention.Item Association of markers of tumor aggressivity and cognition in women with breast cancer before adjuvant treatment: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study(Springer, 2022) Root, James C.; Zhou, Xingtao; Ahn, Jaeil; Small, Brent J.; Zhai, Wanting; Bethea, Traci; Carroll, Judith E.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Dilawari, Asma; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena; Isaacs, Claudine; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nakamura, Zev M.; Patel, Sunita K.; Rentscher, Kelly; Saykin, Andrew J.; Van Dyk, Kathleen; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Ahles, Tim A.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicinePurpose: Tumor features associated with aggressive cancers may affect cognition prior to systemic therapy. We evaluated associations of cognition prior to adjuvant therapy and tumor aggressivity in older breast cancer patients. Methods: Women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer (n = 705) ages 60-98 were enrolled from August 2010-March 2020. Cognition was measured post-surgery, pre-systemic therapy using self-reported (FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment [PCI]) and objective tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE domain) and learning and memory [LM domain]. Linear regression tested associations of pre-treatment tumor features and cognition, adjusting for age, race, and study site. HER2 positivity and higher stage (II/III vs. 0/I) were a priori predictors of cognition; in secondary analyses we explored associations of other tumor features and cognitive impairment (i.e., PCI score < 54 or having 2 tests < 1.5 SD or 1 test < 2 SD from the mean APE or LM domain score). Results: HER2 positivity and the hormone receptor negative/HER2 + molecular subtype were associated with lower adjusted mean self-reported cognition scores and higher impairment rates (p values < .05). Higher stage of disease was associated with lower objective performance in APE. Other tumor features were associated with cognition in unadjusted and adjusted models, including larger tumor size and lower PCI scores (p = 0.02). Tumor features were not related to LM. Conclusions: Pre-adjuvant therapy cognition was associated with HER2 positivity and higher stage of disease and other features of aggressive tumors. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and assess potential mechanisms and clinical management strategies.Item Cognitive function prior to systemic therapy and subsequent well-being in older breast cancer survivors: longitudinal findings from the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study(Wiley, 2020-06) Kobayashi, Lindsay C.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Zhai, Wanting; Zhou, Xingtao; Small, Brent J.; Luta, George; Hurria, Arti; Carroll, Judith; Tometich, Danielle; McDonald, Brenna C.; Graham, Deena; Jim, Heather S.L.; Jacobsen, Paul; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Ahles, Tim A.; Mandelblatt, Jeanne; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineObjective: To investigate the relationships between self-reported and objectively measured cognitive function prior to systemic therapy and subsequent well-being outcomes over 24 months in older breast cancer survivors. Methods: Data were from 397 women aged 60 to 98 diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer in the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study recruited from 2010-2016. Cognitive function was measured at baseline (following surgery, prior to systemic therapy) using neuropsychological assessments of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE), learning and memory (LM), and the self-reported FACT-Cog scale. Well-being was measured using the FACT-G functional, physical, social, and emotional well-being domain scales at baseline and 12 and 24 months later, scaled from 0 (low) to 100 (high). Linear mixed-effects models assessed the relationships between each of baseline APE, LM, and FACT-Cog quartiles with well-being scores over 24 months, adjusted for confounding variables. Results: At baseline, older survivors in the lowest APE, LM, and FACT-Cog score quartiles experienced poorer global well-being than those in the highest quartiles. At 24 months, older survivors tended to improve in well-being, and there were no differences according to baseline APE or LM scores. At 24 months, mean global well-being was 80.3 (95% CI: 76.2-84.3) among those in the lowest vs 86.6 (95% CI: 83.1-90.1) in the highest FACT-cog quartile, a clinically meaningful difference of 6.3 points (95% CI: 1.5-11.1). Conclusions: Among older breast cancer survivors, self-reported, but not objective cognitive impairments, were associated with lower global well-being over the first 2 years of survivorship.Item Deficit Accumulation Frailty Trajectories of Older Breast Cancer Survivors and Non-Cancer Controls: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study(Oxford University Press, 2021) Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Zhou, Xingtao; Small, Brent J.; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Patel, Sunita J.; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Carroll, Judith E.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineBackground: We evaluated deficit accumulation and how deficits affected cognition and physical activity among breast cancer survivors and non-cancer controls. Methods: Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic survivors (n = 353) and matched non-cancer controls (n = 355) ages 60-98 years without neurological impairments were assessed presystemic therapy (or at enrollment for controls) from August 2010 to December 2016 and followed for 36 months. Scores on a 42-item index were analyzed in growth-mixture models to determine deficit accumulation trajectories separately and combined for survivors and controls. Multilevel models tested associations between trajectory and cognition (FACT-Cog and neuropsychological tests) and physical activity (IPAQ-SF) for survivors and controls. Results: Deficit accumulation scores were in the robust range, but survivors had higher scores (95% confidence intervals [CI]) than controls at 36 months (0.18, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.19, vs 0.16, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.17; P = .001), and averages included diverse deficit trajectories. Survivors who were robust but became frailer (8.8%) had similar baseline characteristics to those remaining robust (76.2%) but experienced a 9.6-point decline self-reported cognition (decline of 9.6 vs 3.2 points; P = .04) and a 769 MET minutes per week decline in physical activity (P < .001). Survivors who started and remained prefrail (15.0%) had self-reported and objective cognitive problems. At baseline, frail controls (9.5%) differed from robust controls (83.7%) on deficits and self-reported cognition (P < .001). Within combined trajectories, frail survivors had more sleep disturbances than frail controls (48.6% [SD = 17.4%] vs 25.0% [SD = 8.2%]; P = .05). Conclusions: Most survivors and controls remained robust, and there were similar proportions on a frail trajectory. However, there were differences in deficit patterns between survivors and controls. Survivor deficit accumulation trajectory was associated with patient-reported outcomes. Additional research is needed to understand how breast cancer and its treatments affect deficit accumulation.Item Epigenetic Aging in Older Breast Cancer Survivors and Non-Cancer Controls: Preliminary Findings from the Thinking and Living with Cancer (TLC) Study(Wiley, 2023) Rentscher, Kelly E.; Bethea, Traci N.; Zhai, Wanting; Small, Brent J.; Zhou, Xingtao; Ahles, Tim A.; Ahn, Jaeil; Breen, Elizabeth C.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena M. A.; Jim, Heather S. L.; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nakamura, Zev M.; Patel, Sunita K.; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Van Dyk, Kathleen; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Carroll, Judith E.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineBackground: Cancer and its treatments may accelerate aging in survivors; however, research has not examined epigenetic markers of aging in longer term breast cancer survivors. This study examined whether older breast cancer survivors showed greater epigenetic aging than noncancer controls and whether epigenetic aging related to functional outcomes. Methods: Nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 89) enrolled prior to systemic therapy and frequency-matched controls (n = 101) ages 62 to 84 years provided two blood samples to derive epigenetic aging measures (Horvath, Extrinsic Epigenetic Age [EEA], PhenoAge, GrimAge, Dunedin Pace of Aging) and completed cognitive (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function) and physical (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12) function assessments at approximately 24 to 36 and 60 months after enrollment. Mixed-effects models tested survivor-control differences in epigenetic aging, adjusting for age and comorbidities; models for functional outcomes also adjusted for racial group, site, and cognitive reserve. Results: Survivors were 1.04 to 2.22 years biologically older than controls on Horvath, EEA, GrimAge, and DunedinPACE measures (p = .001-.04) at approximately 24 to 36 months after enrollment. Survivors exposed to chemotherapy were 1.97 to 2.71 years older (p = .001-.04), and among this group, an older EEA related to worse self-reported cognition (p = .047) relative to controls. An older epigenetic age related to worse physical function in all women (p < .001-.01). Survivors and controls showed similar epigenetic aging over time, but Black survivors showed accelerated aging over time relative to non-Hispanic White survivors. Conclusion: Older breast cancer survivors, particularly those exposed to chemotherapy, showed greater epigenetic aging than controls that may relate to worse outcomes. If replicated, measurement of biological aging could complement geriatric assessments to guide cancer care for older women.Item Improving the Approach to Defining, Classifying, Reporting and Monitoring Adverse Events in Seriously Ill Older Adults: Recommendations from a Multi-stakeholder Convening(Springer, 2023) Baim-Lance, Abigail; Ferreira, Katelyn B.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Ellenberg, Susan S.; Kuchel, George A.; Ritchie, Christine; Sachs, Greg A.; Kitzman, Dalane; Morrison, R. Sean; Siu, Albert; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Clinical trials are needed to study topics relevant to older adults with serious illness. Investigators conducting clinical trials with this population are challenged by how to appropriately define, classify, report, and monitor serious and non-serious adverse events (SAEs/AEs), given that some traditionally reported AEs (pressure ulcers, delirium) and SAEs (death, hospitalization) are common in persons with serious illness, and may be consistent with their goals of care. Objectives: A multi-stakeholder group convened to establish greater clarity on and new approaches to address this critical issue. Participants: Thirty-two study investigators, members of regulatory and sponsor agencies, and patient stakeholders took part. Approach: The group met virtually four times and, using a collaborative approach, conducted a survey, select interviews, and reviewed regulatory guidance to collectively define the problem and identify a new approach. Results: SAE/AE challenges fell into two areas: (1) definitions and classifications, including (a) implausible relationships, (b) misalignment with patient-centered care goals, and (c) well-known associations, and (2) reporting and monitoring, including (a) limited guidance, (b) inconsistent standards across regulators, and (c) Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) member knowledge gaps. Problems largely reflected practice norms rather than regulatory requirements that already support context-specific and aggregate reporting. Approaches can be improved by adopting principles that better align strategies for addressing adverse events with the type of intervention being tested, favoring routine and aggregate over expedited reporting, and prioritizing how SAE/AEs relate to patient-centered care goals. Reporting plans and decisions should follow an algorithm underpinned by these principles. Conclusions: Adoption of the proposed approach-and supporting it with education and better alignment with regulatory guidance and procedures-could improve the quality and efficiency of clinical trials' safety involving older adults with serious illness and other vulnerable populations.Item Prediction of cognitive decline in older breast cancer survivors: the Thinking and Living with Cancer study(Oxford University Press, 2024) McDeed, Arthur Patrick; Van Dyk, Kathleen; Zhou, Xingtao; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim A.; Bethea, Traci N.; Carroll, Judith E.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Nakamura, Zev M.; Rentscher, Kelly E.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Small, Brent J.; Root, James C.; Jim, Heather; Patel, Sunita K.; Mcdonald, Brenna C.; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Ahn, Jaeil; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicinePurpose: Cancer survivors commonly report cognitive declines after cancer therapy. Due to the complex etiology of cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD), predicting who will be at risk of CRCD remains a clinical challenge. We developed a model to predict breast cancer survivors who would experience CRCD after systematic treatment. Methods: We used the Thinking and Living with Cancer study, a large ongoing multisite prospective study of older breast cancer survivors with complete assessments pre-systemic therapy, 12 months and 24 months after initiation of systemic therapy. Cognition was measured using neuropsychological testing of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE). CRCD was defined as a 0.25 SD (of observed changes from baseline to 12 months in matched controls) decline or greater in APE score from baseline to 12 months (transient) or persistent as a decline 0.25 SD or greater sustained to 24 months. We used machine learning approaches to predict CRCD using baseline demographics, tumor characteristics and treatment, genotypes, comorbidity, and self-reported physical, psychosocial, and cognitive function. Results: Thirty-two percent of survivors had transient cognitive decline, and 41% of these women experienced persistent decline. Prediction of CRCD was good: yielding an area under the curve of 0.75 and 0.79 for transient and persistent decline, respectively. Variables most informative in predicting CRCD included apolipoprotein E4 positivity, tumor HER2 positivity, obesity, cardiovascular comorbidities, more prescription medications, and higher baseline APE score. Conclusions: Our proof-of-concept tool demonstrates our prediction models are potentially useful to predict risk of CRCD. Future research is needed to validate this approach for predicting CRCD in routine practice settings.Item Protective Effects of APOE ε2 Genotype on Cognition in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study(Oxford University Press, 2021-01-27) Van Dyk, Kathleen; Zhou, Xingtao; Small, Brent J.; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nudelman Holohan, Kelly; Patel, Sunita K.; Rebeck, G. William; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Carroll, Judith E.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineBackground: Cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD) has been linked to apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene ε4 polymorphisms. APOE ε4 polymorphisms are also the strongest genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD), whereas ε2 polymorphisms protect against AD. However, the effects of ε2 polymorphisms on CRCD have not been evaluated. Methods: We evaluated nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 427) and matched noncancer controls (n = 407) ages 60-98 years assessed presystemic therapy from August 2010 to December 2017 with annual follow-up to 24 months. Neuropsychological assessment measured attention, processing speed, executive function, and learning and memory. Linear mixed-effects models tested the effects of having an ε2 allele (vs none) on longitudinal cognitive domain z scores by treatment group (chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy, hormonal therapy, and control) controlling for covariates; participants with ε2/ε4 genotype were excluded. Sensitivity analyses examined effects of other covariates and any ε4 positivity. Results: There was an interaction with genotype for attention, processing speed, and executive functioning domain scores (Beta = 0.32, 95% confidence interval = 0.00 to 0.65); the chemotherapy group with an ε2 allele had higher scores at baseline and maintained higher scores over time compared with those without an ε2 allele, and this protective effect was not seen for other groups. There was no effect of ε2 on learning and memory domain scores. Conclusions: APOE ε2 polymorphisms may protect against CRCD in older breast cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy. With replication, this information could be useful for survivorship care and informing future studies of possible links to AD and defining mechanisms of protection.Item Response to Dekker, Stege, and Versteeg(Oxford University Press, 2021) Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Zhou, Xingtao; Small, Brent J.; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Patel, Sunita K.; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Carroll, Judith E.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine