Browsing by Author "Coe, Fredric"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Metabolic diagnosis and medical prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis and its systemic manifestations: a consensus statement
    (Springer-Verlag, 2016-12) Gambaro, Giovanni; Croppi, Emanuele; Coe, Fredric; Lingeman, James; Moe, Orson; Worcester, Elen; Buchholz, Noor; Bushinsky, David; Curhan, Gary C.; Ferraro, Pietro Manuel; Fuster, Daniel; Goldfarb, David S.; Heilberg, Ita Pfeferman; Hess, Bernard; Lieske, John; Marangella, Martino; Milliner, Dawn; Preminger, Glen M.; Reis Santos, Jose’ Manuel; Sakhaee, Khashayar; Sarica, Kemal; Siener, Roswitha; Strazzullo, Pasquale; Williams, James C.; Department of Urology, School of Medicine
    BACKGROUND: Recently published guidelines on the medical management of renal stone disease did not address relevant topics in the field of idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis, which are important also for clinical research. DESIGN: A steering committee identified 27 questions, which were proposed to a faculty of 44 experts in nephrolithiasis and allied fields. A systematic review of the literature was conducted and 5216 potentially relevant articles were selected; from these, 407 articles were deemed to provide useful scientific information. The Faculty, divided into working groups, analysed the relevant literature. Preliminary statements developed by each group were exhaustively discussed in plenary sessions and approved. RESULTS: Statements were developed to inform clinicians on the identification of secondary forms of calcium nephrolithiasis and systemic complications; on the definition of idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis; on the use of urinary tests of crystallization and of surgical observations during stone treatment in the management of these patients; on the identification of patients warranting preventive measures; on the role of fluid and nutritional measures and of drugs to prevent recurrent episodes of stones; and finally, on the cooperation between the urologist and nephrologist in the renal stone patients. CONCLUSIONS: This document has addressed idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis from the perspective of a disease that can associate with systemic disorders, emphasizing the interplay needed between urologists and nephrologists. It is complementary to the American Urological Association and European Association of Urology guidelines. Future areas for research are identified.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Stone Morphology Distinguishes Two Pathways of Idiopathic Calcium Oxalate Stone Pathogenesis
    (Mary Ann Liebert, 2022) Williams, James C., Jr.; Al-Awadi, Haider; Muthenini, Manognya; Bledsoe, Sharon B.; El-Achkar, Tarek; Evan, Andrew P.; Coe, Fredric; Lingeman, James E.; Worcester, Elaine M.; Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, School of Medicine
    Introduction: About 1 in 11 Americans will experience a kidney stone, but underlying causes remain obscure. The objective of the present study was to separate idiopathic calcium oxalate stone formers by whether or not they showed positive evidence of forming a stone on Randall's plaque (RP). Materials and Methods: In patients undergoing either percutaneous or ureteroscopic procedures for kidney stone removal, all stone material was extracted and analyzed using micro-CT imaging to identify those attached to RP. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected weeks after the stone removal procedure and patients were off of medications that would affect urine composition. The endoscopic video was analyzed for papillary pathology (RP, pitting, plugging, dilated ducts, and loss of papillary shape) by an observer blinded to the data on stone type. The percent papillary area occupied by RP and ductal plugging was quantified using image analysis software. Results: Patients having even one stone on RP (N = 36) did not differ from non-RP patients (N = 37) in age, sex, BMI, or other clinical characteristics. Compared with the non-RP group, RP stone formers had more numerous, but smaller, stones, more abundant papillary RP formation, and fewer ductal plugs, both by quantitative measurement of surface area (on average, three times more plaque area, but only 41% as much plug area as in non-RP patients) and by semiquantitative visual grading. Serum and blood values did not differ between RP and non-RP stone formers by any measure. Conclusions: Growth of many small stones on plaque seems the pathogenetic scheme for the RP stone-forming phenotype, whereas the non-RP phenotype stone pathogenesis pathway is less obvious. Higher papillary plugging in non-RP patients suggests that plugs play a role in stone formation and that these patients have a greater degree of papillary damage. Underlying mechanisms that create these distinctive phenotypes are presently unknown.