Browsing by Author "Claxton, Gina"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    159 Community Engagement (CE) Brokers: Diversity and the Science of CE
    (Cambridge University Press, 2022-04-19) Piechowski, Patricia; Claxton, Gina; Spencer, Nicola; Vasile, Elizabeth; Zender, Robynn; Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI), School of Medicine
    OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Since 2013, managers of community engagement (CE) programs across the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) have convened monthly to build connections, share knowledge, and enable collaboration. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Notable for focus on staff leadership, the CE Brokers group has been central to the ongoing success of CTSA community engagement partnerships and approaches to research. In early 2022, a survey of the 139-member group asked about their roles and responsibilities, the ways the CE Brokers network has contributed to their hubs adoption and development of best practices and innovations, resources and lessons learned, and the creation of opportunities for members to collaboratively conduct and disseminate original research, and research on the science of community engagement. The survey also asked CE Brokers if they or their community partners are part of an underrepresented community. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: These demographic data will be shared, along with analyses of data on growth of the group over time, evolving themes, and a SWOT analysis completed in 2021. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This will provide a platform to explore new avenues for the CE Brokers and their impact within the NCATS CTSA consortium, in line with the evolving direction of the clinical and translational research enterprise.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    196 Measuring the Impact of Community Engagement Brokers through Qualitative Interviews
    (Cambridge University Press, 2023-04-24) Piechowski, Patricia; Claxton, Gina; Spencer, Nicola 'Nicki'; Vasile, Elizabeth; Zender, Robynn; Medicine, School of Medicine
    OBJECTIVES/GOALS: As the clinical and translational research enterprise evolves toward addressing health equity and the science of translational science, the CE Brokers are exploring new avenues for impacting the CTSA consortium. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Since 2013, managers of Community Engagement (CE) programs across the NCATS CTSA institutes have met monthly to build connections, share knowledge, and advocate for the boundary spanner role. As the clinical and translational research enterprise evolves toward addressing health equity and the science of translational science, the CE Brokers are exploring new avenues for impacting the CTSA consortium. The CE Brokers are composed of 140 individuals from 58 CTSA-associated institutions, and have a long history that has fostered rich, trusting relationships. The growth and strength of this group has primed it to pivot with the new NCATS direction to contribute meaningfully to the science of community engagement and continue the work of improving health equity within the communities we serve. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: In 2022; we surveyed its members about their roles and responsibilities; the ways the network has contributed to their hub’s adoption and development of best practices and innovations; resources and lessons learned; the creation of opportunities for members to collaboratively conduct and disseminate original research; and research on the science of CE. Grounding ourselves in this initial data, we have developed interview questions to take the inquiry further, by gathering qualitative data on the impact of the group: How the Brokers group impacted them personally and professionally; How the Brokers impacted the work of their CTSA; In three words, describe the group; How could the CE Brokers contribute to the science of community engagement? DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Together, we will identify themes supported by quotes to inform how the CE Broker group is most effectively moving the CTSAs’ mission forward and how it can be improved. These will be shared at the Translational Science Meeting, 2023.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    4405 Chronic Disease in Indiana – Using a Community Health Matrix to Determine Health Factors for Indiana Counties
    (Cambridge University Press, 2020-07-29) Wiehe, Sarah; Zych, Aaron; Hinshaw, Karen; Alley, Ann; Claxton, Gina; Savaiano, Dennis; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this project was to inform four chronic disease initiatives, working together on the team Connections IN Health, and counties in Indiana on certain areas of need to assist them in collaborative planning. The chronic diseases focused on include diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke, asthma, lung cancer and obesity. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Chronic disease health outcomes and social determinants of health indicators were identified in all 92 Indiana counties. Counties were compared by composite z scores in a matrix to determine the 23 counties with the poorest health statistics for diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke, asthma, lung cancer, obesity and life expectancy. Qualitative data were used to identify local health coalitions that have the capacity and desire to work with Connections IN Health to improve these health outcomes. With input from partners, the counties were narrowed to 10 that were identified as those with the most need in the specific areas of chronic disease that the initiatives focus on. The team will begin listening sessions with two of these counties to identify strategic partnerships, funding sources, and evidence-based programs to address community-identified health priorities. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The 23 counties with the poorest health outcomes related to chronic disease and factors were Blackford, Clark, Clay, Fayette, Fulton, Grant, Greene, Howard, Jay, Jennings, Knox, Lake, LaPorte, Madison, Marion, Pike, Scott, Starke, Sullivan, Vanderburgh, Vermillion, Vigo, and Washington. There was significant overlap in low z score rankings for individual health and social determinants of health measures among these 23 counties. The following 10 counties were selected for focus in the next five years based on partner input: Blackford, Clay, Grant, Jennings, Lake, Madison, Marion, Starke, Vermillion, and Washington. The Connections IN Health team has initiated listening sessions in Grant and Vermillion Counties (with data for presentation at the ACTS meeting). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This mixed methods approach using existing data and partner input on county capacity/readiness directed Connections IN Health to counties with the most need for coalition efforts. Engagement within each county will inform next steps (e.g., capacity building, partnership development, applications for funding, implementation of evidence-based programs) and specific health focus area(s).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    4408 Using a human-centered design process to address challenges of engaging pregnant & parenting women with opioid use disorder
    (Cambridge University Press, 2020-07-29) Wiehe, Sarah; Lynch, Dustin; Moore, Courtney; Cockrum, Brandon; Hawryluk, Bridget; Claxton, Gina; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Using a human-centered approach, IDEO, a nationally-renown human-centered design team, and Research Jam, Indiana CTSI’s patient engagement core, integrated and tailored complimentary programs to address the challenges of engaging mothers with opioid misuse around the time of birth. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Gathered data through focus groups, site visits, and one-on-one interviews with key stakeholders: mothers in opioid use recovery, peer recovery coaches, and other people living with or directly affected by opioid use disorder (OUD). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Themes emerged around stigma (e.g., constant judgment, majority of interactions focused on addiction, addiction comes from bad choices), the healthcare system (e.g., healthcare system bias and stigma, misalignment of services and timing of need, no support for support network), and relating to recovery (very variable but generally ambiguous and uncertain process and outcomes, importance of peer recovery coaches, importance of community resources). Identified themes were used to create insights that informed the underlying concepts of an engagement strategy including support and resources for recovery coaches, and education materials for mothers with OUD. One of human-centered design’s strengths is iteration, and the materials created for this have yet to be tested and refined thoroughly to be meaningful and lasting interventions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Considerable insights into the lived experience of those experiencing OUD and those who support these individuals yielded tangible ways to test improved engagement and recruitment of women with OUD at the time of birth.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    "I Am Interested!": The Voices of the Community and Their Participation in Health Advisory Boards
    (Mary Ann Liebert, 2024-01-08) Sotto-Santiago, Sylk; Wiehe, Sarah; Claxton, Gina; Stamper, Gavin; Delp, Lindsey; Hudson, Brenda; Lynch, Dustin; Moe, Sharon; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Researchers can often be challenged by meaningful efforts to involve the public and communities in research. Community and health advisory boards (HABs) offer an opportunity to create a fully intentional and honest relationship between researchers and the community. Objective: Most recently, the All Indiana (IN) for Health HAB had four openings and a call was published to our community of over 13,800 individuals in the All IN for Health newsletter. Four hundred eighty-eight individuals submitted applications to become part of the board. In what follows, we share the lessons in motivations and interests of individuals who responded. Methods: The application process included the following questions: What lived experiences and/or personal interests have motivated you to be involved in All IN for Health? Please explain why you are interested in being an All IN for HAB member. Our analysis approach was qualitative and centered on narrative research. Results: We organize the findings in two categories: Motivation and Interests. Individuals were motivated to participate based on family or friend diagnosis, personal diagnosis, roles as caregivers, desire to impact change and advocacy, role as health professional, and previous participation in research. Interests followed similar themes beginning with crediting their interest to a diagnosis. In addition, we categorized desire to share their experience, personal positionality, and previous research experience, and contributing to the education of student/trainee. Conclusion: By understanding motivations, we understand needs. This information can be used for other advisory boards, as well as recruitment into research participation and health care advocacy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Identifying Patient-Centered Outcomes for Caregivers and Children With Musculoskeletal Infections
    (Oxford University Press, 2022-12-12) Wood, James B.; Hawryluk, Bridget; Lynch, Dustin; Claxton, Gina; Russell, Kelsey; Bennett, William E., Jr.; Wiehe, Sarah E.; Carroll, Aaron E.; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Background: Musculoskeletal infections (MSKI), including osteomyelitis and septic arthritis, are among the most common invasive infections in children and have the potential to cause significant morbidity. Guidelines have been developed to optimize care based on clinician-developed endpoints. Patient-centered outcomes have not been defined for children with MSKI. This study identified outcomes most important to caregivers and patients with MSKI. Methods: This was a single-center prospective qualitative study of children 6 months to 18 years of age hospitalized with MSKI from November 2019 to September 2021. Using design-research methods, patients and caregivers participated in interviews and/or completed journals to describe their experiences during acute infection and recovery from MSKI. Results: A total of 51 patient/caregivers were approached to participate in the study, 35 of whom declined to participate, resulting in 8 interviews conducted and 14 journals collected from 16 patient/caregivers. From these, a journey map was created highlighting points of stress during the onset of symptoms, through hospitalization, and returning home with new challenges. In addition, patient-centered outcomes were identified. For caregivers, these included managing mental health, managing responsibilities, and receiving support. Both caregivers and patients shared the importance of understanding of treatment plans and responsibilities. For patients, improving mental and physical health was important. Conclusions: Management of children with MSKI is complex and requires a multidisciplinary team approach. Validation of the outcomes identified and development of a measurement tool are needed. Addressing the patient-centered outcomes we identified in this study can greatly improve the holistic care of children with MSKI.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    "Research Jam": Engaging patients and other stakeholders through human-centered design to improve translational research
    (Cambridge University Press, 2022-11-14) Wiehe, Sarah E.; Moore, Courtney M.; Lynch, Dustin O.; Claxton, Gina; Bauer, Nerissa S.; Sanematsu, Helen; Pediatrics, School of Medicine
    Effective stakeholder engagement increases research relevance and utility. Though published principles of community-based participatory research and patient-centered outcomes research offer guidance, few resources offer effective techniques to engage stakeholders and translate their engagement into improvements in research process and outcomes. The Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (Indiana CTSI) is home to Research Jam (RJ), an interdisciplinary team of researchers, project management professionals, and design experts, that employs human-centered design (HCD) to engage stakeholders in the research process. Establishing HCD services at the Indiana CTSI has allowed for accessible and innovative stakeholder-engaged research. RJ offers services for stakeholder-informed study design, measurement, implementation, and dissemination. RJ’s services are in demand to address research barriers pertaining to a diverse array of health topics and stakeholder groups. As a result, the RJ team has grown significantly with both institutional and extramural support. Researchers involved in RJ projects report that working with RJ helped them learn how to better engage with stakeholders in research and changed the way they approach working with stakeholders. RJ can serve as a potential model for effectively engaging stakeholders through HCD to improve translational research.