Browsing by Author "Chodosh, Joshua"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adverse Social Exposome by Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) Neuropathology for a National Cohort of Brain Donors within the Neighborhoods Study
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Kind, Amy J. H.; Bendlin, Barbara B.; Keller, Sarah A.; Powell, W. Ryan; DeWitt, Amanda; Cheng, Yixuan; Chamberlain, Luke; Lyons Boone, Brittney; Miller, Megan J.; Vik, Stacie M.; Abner, Erin L.; Alosco, Michael L.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Bakulski, Kelly M.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Bateman, James R.; Beach, Thomas G.; Bennett, David A.; Brewer, James B.; Carrion, Carmen; Chodosh, Joshua; Craft, Suzanne; Croff, Raina; Fabio, Anthony; Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah; Goldstein, Felicia; Henderson, Victor W.; Karikari, Thomas; Kofler, Julia; Kucharska-Newton, Anna M.; Lamar, Melissa; Lanata, Serggio; Lepping, Rebecca J.; Lingler, Jennifer H.; Lockhart, Samuel N.; Mahnken, Jonathan D.; Marsh, Karyn; Meyer, Oanh L.; Miller, Bruce L.; Morris, Jill K.; Neugroschl, Judith A.; O'Connor, Maureen K.; Paulson, Henry L.; Perrin, Richard J.; Pierce, Aimee; Raji, Cyrus A.; Reiman, Eric M.; Risacher, Shannon L.; Rissman, Robert A.; Rodriguez Espinoza, Patricia; Sano, Mary; Saykin, Andrew J.; Serrano, Geidy E.; Sultzer, David L.; Whitmer, Rachel A.; Wisniewski, Thomas; Woltjer, Randall; Zhu, Carolyn W.; Neurology, School of Medicine
    Background: Adverse social exposome (indexed by high national Area Deprivation Index [ADI]) is linked to structural inequities and increased risk of clinical dementia diagnosis, yet linkage to ADRD neuropathology remains largely unknown. Early work from single site brain banks suggests a relationship, but assessment in large national cohorts is needed to increase generalizability and depth, particularly for rarer neuropathology findings. Objective: Determine the association between adverse social exposome by ADI and ADRD neuropathology for brain donors from 21 Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) brain banks as part of the on‐going Neighborhoods Study. Methods: All brain donors in participating sites with neuropathology data deposited at the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) and identifiers for ADI linkage (N = 8,637; Figure 1) were included. Geocoded donor addresses were linked to time‐concordant national ADI percentiles for year of death, categorized into standard groupings of low (ADI 1‐19), medium (20‐49) and high (50‐100) ADI. Neuropathological findings were drawn from NACC and reflected standard assessment practices at time of donation. Logistic regression models, adjusted for sex and age at death, assessed relationships between high ADI and neuropathology findings. Results: Of the N = 8,637 brain donors (Table 1), 2,071 of 2,366 assessed (88%) had AD pathology by NIA‐AA criteria; 4,197 of 6,929 assessed (61%) had cerebral amyloid angiopathy; 2582 of 8092 assessed (32%) had Lewy body pathology; 391 of 2351 assessed (17%) had non‐AD tauopathy; and 586 of 1680 assessed (35%) had TDP‐43 pathology. 2,126(25%) were high ADI; 3,171(37%) medium ADI and 3,340(38%) low ADI with 51% female and average age at death of 81.9 years. As compared to low ADI donors, high ADI brain donors had adjusted odds = 1.35 (95% CI = 0.98‐1.86, p‐value = 0.06) for AD pathology; 1.10 (0.98–1.25, p = 0.11) for cerebral amyloid angiopathy; 1.37 (1.21–1.55, p<0.01) for Lewy body; 1.09 (0.83–1.44, p = 0.53) for non‐AD tauopathy; and 1.40 (1.08‐1.81, p = 0.01) for TDP‐43 pathology (Table 2). Conclusions: This first‐in‐field study provides evidence that the adverse social exposome (high ADI) is strongly associated with an increased risk of Lewy body, an increased risk of TDP‐43, and a trend towards increased AD pathology in a national cohort of brain donors.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Implementing Models of Geriatric Care—Behind the Scenes
    (Wiley, 2018) Chodosh, Joshua; Weiner, Michael; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Innovative geriatric clinical programs have proliferated in the 21st century, and many have been highlighted in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS). The Affordable Care Act has supported the accelerated innovation of publicized and unpublicized program development, adaptation, and implementation. Many JAGS articles report work conducted in programs with significant improvements in quality; high satisfaction for patients and providers; and for some, reductions in costs. Despite considerable detail, enabling implementers to attempt to adopt reported programs or adapt them to local environments, much less is typically conveyed about the subtleties of the implementation process that led to a successful outcome. Moreover, where we have been given a window into successful initiatives, far less is known about those that failed and even less about why some succeeded but others failed. With a focus on our shared needs as a geriatrics community, to foster the exchange of more‐comprehensive models of successful and failed implementation, we propose publications that address implementation itself—a second layer of reporting about the “hidden” elements that may have been decisive factors in taking an efficacious test, treatment, or model and putting it into real‐world practice. We propose a new platform for sharing a broader range of healthcare quality improvement initiatives—successes and failures. We include several salient characteristics that could be measured and described in support of dynamic, sustainable, evidence‐based implementation of geriatrics programs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Interaction between cognitive impairment and discharge destination and its effect on rehospitalization
    (Wiley, 2013-11) Nazir, Arif; LaMantia, Michael; Chodosh, Joshua; Khan, Babar; Campbell, Noll; Hui, Siu; Boustani, Malaz; Medicine, School of Medicine
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of cognitive impairment on rehospitalization in older adults. DESIGN: One-year longitudinal study. SETTING: Medical service of an urban, 340-bed public hospital in Indianapolis between July 2006 and March 2008. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older admitted to the medical service (N = 976). MEASUREMENTS: Rehospitalization was defined as any hospital admission after the index admission. Participant demographics, discharge destination, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Acute Physiology Score, and prior hospitalizations were measured as the confounders. Participants were considered to have cognitive impairment if they had two or more errors on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, a significant interaction between cognitive impairment and discharge location was found to predict rehospitalization rate (P = .008) and time to 1-year rehospitalization (P = .03). Participants with cognitive impairment discharged to a facility had a longer time to rehospitalization (median 142 days) than participants with no cognitive impairment (median 98 days) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.58-1.02, P = .07), whereas participants with cognitive impairment discharged to home had a slightly shorter time to rehospitalization (median 182 days) than those without cognitive impairment (median 224 days) (HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.92-1.43, P = .23). These two nonsignificant HRs in opposite directions were significantly different from each other (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Discharge destination modifies the association between cognitive impairment and rehospitalization. Of participants discharged to a facility, those without cognitive impairment had higher rehospitalization rates, whereas the rates were similar between cognitively impaired and intact participants discharged to the community.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Over‐Representation of Extremely Wealthy Neighborhood Social Exposomes for Brain Donors within Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Brain Banks assessed by the Neighborhoods Study
    (Wiley, 2025-01-09) Kind, Amy J. H.; Bendlin, Barbara B.; Powell, W. Ryan; DeWitt, Amanda; Cheng, Yixuan; Chamberlain, Luke; Sharrow, Jessica; Lyons Boone, Brittney; Abner, Erin L.; Alosco, Michael L.; Apostolova, Liana G.; Bakulski, Kelly M.; Barnes, Lisa L.; Bateman, James R.; Beach, Thomas G.; Bennett, David A.; Brewer, James B.; Carrion, Carmen; Chodosh, Joshua; Craft, Suzanne; Croff, Raina; Fabio, Anthony; Tomaszewski Farias, Sarah; Goldstein, Felicia; Henderson, Victor W.; Karikari, Thomas K.; Kofler, Julia; Kucharska-Newton, Anna M.; Lamar, Melissa; Lanata, Serggio; Lepping, Rebecca J.; Lingler, Jennifer H.; Lockhart, Samuel N.; Mahnken, Jonathan D.; Marsh, Karyn; Meyer, Oanh L.; Miller, Bruce L.; Morris, Jill K.; Neugroschl, Judith A.; O'Connor, Maureen K.; Paulson, Henry L.; Perrin, Richard J.; Pettigrew, Corinne; Pierce, Aimee; Raji, Cyrus A.; Reiman, Eric M.; Risacher, Shannon L.; Rissman, Robert A.; Rodriguez Espinoza, Patricia; Sano, Mary; Saykin, Andrew J.; Serrano, Geidy E.; Soldan, Anja; Sultzer, David L.; Whitmer, Rachel A.; Wisniewski, Thomas; Woltjer, Randall; Zhu, Carolyn W.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine
    Background: Adverse social exposome (indexed by national Area Deprivation Index [ADI] 80‐100 or ‘high ADI’) is linked to structural inequities and increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Twenty percent of the US population resides within high ADI areas, predominantly in inner cities, tribal reservations and rural areas. The percentage of brain donors from high ADI areas within the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) brain bank system is unknown. Objective: Determine ADI for brain donors from 21 ADRC sites as part of the on‐going Neighborhoods Study. Methods: All brain donors in participating ADRC sites with NACC neuropathology data and personal identifiers for ADI linkage (N = 8,637) were included (Figure 1). Geocoded donor addresses were linked to time‐concordant ADI percentiles for year of death. Results: Overall, only 5.6% of ADRC brain donors (N = 488) resided in a high ADI (disadvantaged) neighborhood at death. The remaining donors resided in more advantaged neighborhoods, with nearly 40% of donors living in the wealthiest quintile of neighborhoods, and over 300 brain donors originating from the wealthiest 1% of US neighborhoods (Figure 2). Donors from high ADI (disadvantaged) neighborhoods identified as 87% White (n = 424), 11% Black (55), 1% Multiracial (6) and <1% other/unknown race (3), with 1% Hispanic (5). None identified as American Indian/Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander/Asian. In comparison, donors from low ADI neighborhoods were 94% White (n = 7680), 3% Black (273), 1% Multiracial (75), <1% American Indian/Alaska Native (11), <1% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander/Asian (60), and <1% other/unknown race (50), with 3% Hispanic (230). Sex distribution was similar (54%, 51% female, respectively). Inclusion of high ADI donors varied dramatically across the 21 ADRC brain banks from a low of 0.6% to high of 20% of all a site’s donors (Figure 3). Conclusions: ADI was determined for over 8,600 brain donors in the ADRC system, demonstrating a marked over‐representation of donors from very low ADI (extremely wealthy) neighborhoods, in addition to site‐to‐site variability. This is the first time a comprehensive cross‐sectional social exposome assessment of this nature has been performed, opening windows for additional mechanistic study of the social exposome on brain pathology. Life course ADI assessments are on‐going.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Program of Intensive Support in Emergency Departments for Care Partners of Cognitively Impaired Patients: Protocol for a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial
    (JMIR Publications, 2022-10-20) Chodosh, Joshua; Connor, Karen; Fowler, Nicole; Gao, Sujuan; Perkins, Anthony; Grudzen, Corita; Messina, Frank; Mangold, Michael; Smilowitz, Jessica; Boustani, Malaz; Borson, Soo; Biostatistics, School of Public Health
    Background: Older adults with cognitive impairment have more emergency department visits and 30-day readmissions and are more likely to die after visiting the emergency department than people without cognitive impairment. Emergency department providers frequently do not identify cognitive impairment. Use of cognitive screening tools, along with better understanding of root causes for emergency department visits, could equip health care teams with the knowledge needed to develop individually tailored care management strategies for post-emergency department care. By identifying and directly addressing patients' and informal caregivers' (or care partners') psychosocial and health care needs, such strategies could reduce the need for repeat acute care. We have used the terms "caregiver" and "care partner" interchangeably. Objective: We aimed to describe the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a new care management intervention, the Program of Intensive Support in Emergency Departments for Care Partners of Cognitively Impaired Patients (POISED) trial, compared with usual care. We described the research design, intervention, outcome measures, data collection techniques, and analysis plans. Methods: Emergency department patients who were aged ≥75 years and screened positive for cognitive impairment via either the Mini-Cog or the proxy-reported Short Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, with a planned discharge to home, were recruited to participate with their identified informal (family or friend) caregiver in the 2-site POISED randomized controlled trial at New York University Langone Health and Indiana University. The intervention group received 6 months of care management from the POISED Care Team of registered nurses and specialty-trained paraprofessionals, who perform root cause analyses, administer standardized assessments, provide advice, recommend appropriate referrals, and, when applicable, implement dementia-specific comorbid condition protocols. The control group received care as recommended at emergency department discharge (usual care) and were given information about resources for further cognitive assessment. The primary outcome is repeat emergency department use; secondary outcomes include caregiver activation for patient health care management, caregiver depression, anxiety, and experience of social support as important predisposing and time-varying enabling and need characteristics. Data were collected from questionnaires and patients' electronic health records. Results: Recruitment was conducted between March 2018 and May 2021. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented to peer audiences, decision makers, stakeholders, and other interested persons. Conclusions: The POISED intervention is a promising approach to tailoring care management based on root causes for emergency department admission of patients with cognitive impairment with the aim of reducing readmissions. This trial will provide insights for caregivers and emergency department and primary care providers on appropriate, personalized, and proactive treatment plans for older adults with cognitive impairment. The findings will be relevant to audiences concerned with quality of life for individuals with cognitive impairment and their caregivers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Program of Intensive Support in Emergency Departments for Care Partners of Cognitively Impaired Patients: Protocol for a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial
    (JMIR, 2022-10) Chodosh, Joshua; Connor, Karen; Fowler, Nicole; Gao, Sujuan; Perkins, Anthony; Grudzen, Corita; Messina, Frank; Mangold, Michael; Smilowitz, Jessica; Boustani, Malaz; Borson, Soo; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background Older adults with cognitive impairment have more emergency department visits and 30-day readmissions and are more likely to die after visiting the emergency department than people without cognitive impairment. Emergency department providers frequently do not identify cognitive impairment. Use of cognitive screening tools, along with better understanding of root causes for emergency department visits, could equip health care teams with the knowledge needed to develop individually tailored care management strategies for post–emergency department care. By identifying and directly addressing patients’ and informal caregivers’ (or care partners’) psychosocial and health care needs, such strategies could reduce the need for repeat acute care. We have used the terms “caregiver” and “care partner” interchangeably. Objective We aimed to describe the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a new care management intervention, the Program of Intensive Support in Emergency Departments for Care Partners of Cognitively Impaired Patients (POISED) trial, compared with usual care. We described the research design, intervention, outcome measures, data collection techniques, and analysis plans. Methods Emergency department patients who were aged ≥75 years and screened positive for cognitive impairment via either the Mini-Cog or the proxy-reported Short Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, with a planned discharge to home, were recruited to participate with their identified informal (family or friend) caregiver in the 2-site POISED randomized controlled trial at New York University Langone Health and Indiana University. The intervention group received 6 months of care management from the POISED Care Team of registered nurses and specialty-trained paraprofessionals, who perform root cause analyses, administer standardized assessments, provide advice, recommend appropriate referrals, and, when applicable, implement dementia-specific comorbid condition protocols. The control group received care as recommended at emergency department discharge (usual care) and were given information about resources for further cognitive assessment. The primary outcome is repeat emergency department use; secondary outcomes include caregiver activation for patient health care management, caregiver depression, anxiety, and experience of social support as important predisposing and time-varying enabling and need characteristics. Data were collected from questionnaires and patients’ electronic health records. Results Recruitment was conducted between March 2018 and May 2021. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented to peer audiences, decision makers, stakeholders, and other interested persons. Conclusions The POISED intervention is a promising approach to tailoring care management based on root causes for emergency department admission of patients with cognitive impairment with the aim of reducing readmissions. This trial will provide insights for caregivers and emergency department and primary care providers on appropriate, personalized, and proactive treatment plans for older adults with cognitive impairment. The findings will be relevant to audiences concerned with quality of life for individuals with cognitive impairment and their caregivers. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03325608; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03325608 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/36607