- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Cadet, Sebastien"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Clinical Deployment of Explainable Artificial Intelligence of SPECT for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease(Elsevier, 2022) Otaki, Yuka; Singh, Ananya; Kavanagh, Paul; Miller, Robert J. H.; Parekh, Tejas; Tamarappoo, Balaji K.; Sharir, Tali; Einstein, Andrew J.; Fish, Mathews B.; Ruddy, Terrence D.; Kaufmann, Philipp A.; Sinusas, Albert J.; Miller, Edward J.; Bateman, Timothy M.; Dorbala, Sharmila; Di Carli, Marcelo; Cadet, Sebastien; Liang, Joanna X.; Dey, Damini; Berman, Daniel S.; Slomka, Piotr J.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Explainable artificial intelligence (AI) can be integrated within standard clinical software to facilitate the acceptance of the diagnostic findings during clinical interpretation. Objectives: This study sought to develop and evaluate a novel, general purpose, explainable deep learning model (coronary artery disease-deep learning [CAD-DL]) for the detection of obstructive CAD following single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Methods: A total of 3,578 patients with suspected CAD undergoing SPECT MPI and invasive coronary angiography within a 6-month interval from 9 centers were studied. CAD-DL computes the probability of obstructive CAD from stress myocardial perfusion, wall motion, and wall thickening maps, as well as left ventricular volumes, age, and sex. Myocardial regions contributing to the CAD-DL prediction are highlighted to explain the findings to the physician. A clinical prototype was integrated using a standard clinical workstation. Diagnostic performance by CAD-DL was compared to automated quantitative total perfusion deficit (TPD) and reader diagnosis. Results: In total, 2,247 patients (63%) had obstructive CAD. In 10-fold repeated testing, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) (95% CI) was higher according to CAD-DL (AUC: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.82-0.85]) than stress TPD (AUC: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.77-0.80]) or reader diagnosis (AUC: 0.71 [95% CI: 0.69-0.72]; P < 0.0001 for both). In external testing, the AUC in 555 patients was higher according to CAD-DL (AUC: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.76-0.84]) than stress TPD (AUC: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.69-0.77]) or reader diagnosis (AUC: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.61-0.69]; P < 0.001 for all). The present model can be integrated within standard clinical software and generates results rapidly (<12 seconds on a standard clinical workstation) and therefore could readily be incorporated into a typical clinical workflow. Conclusions: The deep-learning model significantly surpasses the diagnostic accuracy of standard quantitative analysis and clinical visual reading for MPI. Explainable artificial intelligence can be integrated within standard clinical software to facilitate acceptance of artificial intelligence diagnosis of CAD following MPI.Item Prediction of Revascularization by Coronary CT Angiography using a Machine Learning Ischemia Risk Score(Springer, 2021) Kwan, Alan C.; McElhinney, Priscilla A.; Tamarappoo, Balaji K.; Cadet, Sebastien; Hurtado, Cecilia; Miller, Robert J. H.; Han, Donghee; Otaki, Yuka; Eisenberg, Evann; Ebinger, Joseph E.; Slomka, Piotr J.; Cheng, Victor Y.; Berman, Daniel S.; Dey, Damini; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineObjectives: The machine learning ischemia risk score (ML-IRS) is a machine learning-based algorithm designed to identify hemodynamically significant coronary disease using quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The purpose of this study was to examine whether the ML-IRS can predict revascularization in patients referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) after CCTA. Methods: This study was a post hoc analysis of a prospective dual-center registry of sequential patients undergoing CCTA followed by ICA within 3 months, referred from inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department settings (n = 352, age 63 ± 10 years, 68% male). The primary outcome was revascularization by either percutaneous coronary revascularization or coronary artery bypass grafting. Blinded readers performed semi-automated quantitative coronary plaque analysis. The ML-IRS was automatically computed. Relationships between clinical risk factors, coronary plaque features, and ML-IRS with revascularization were examined. Results: The study cohort consisted of 352 subjects with 1056 analyzable vessels. The ML-IRS ranged between 0 and 81% with a median of 18.7% (6.4-34.8). Revascularization was performed in 26% of vessels. Vessels receiving revascularization had higher ML-IRS (33.6% (21.1-55.0) versus 13.0% (4.5-29.1), p < 0.0001), as well as higher contrast density difference, and total, non-calcified, calcified, and low-density plaque burden. ML-IRS, when added to a traditional risk model based on clinical data and stenosis to predict revascularization, resulted in increased area under the curve from 0.69 (95% CI: 0.65-0.72) to 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75-0.81) (p < 0.0001), with an overall continuous net reclassification improvement of 0.636 (95% CI: 0.503-0.769; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: ML-IRS from quantitative coronary CT angiography improved the prediction of future revascularization and can potentially identify patients likely to receive revascularization if referred to cardiac catheterization. Key points: • Machine learning ischemia risk from quantitative coronary CT angiography was significantly higher in patients who received revascularization versus those who did not receive revascularization. • The machine learning ischemia risk score was significantly higher in patients with invasive fractional flow ≤ 0.8 versus those with > 0.8. • The machine learning ischemia risk score improved the prediction of future revascularization significantly when added to a standard prediction model including stenosis.Item Sex differences in computed tomography angiography-derived coronary plaque burden in relation to invasive fractional flow reserve(Elsevier, 2023) Han, Donghee; van Diemen, Pepijn; Kuronuma, Keiichiro; Lin, Andrew; Motwani, Manish; McElhinney, Priscilla; Flores Tomasino, Guadalupe; Park, Caroline; Kwan, Alan; Tzolos, Evangelos; Klein, Eyal; Grodecki, Kajetan; Shou, Benjamin; Tamarappoo, Balaji; Cadet, Sebastien; Danad, Ibrahim; Driessen, Roel S.; Berman, Daniel S.; Slomka, Piotr J.; Dey, Damini; Knaapen, Paul; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Distinct sex-related differences exist in coronary artery plaque burden and distribution. We aimed to explore sex differences in quantitative plaque burden by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in relation to ischemia by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods: This post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial included 581 vessels in 203 patients (mean age 58.1 ± 8.7 years, 63.5% male) who underwent CCTA and per-vessel invasive FFR. Quantitative assessment of total, calcified, non-calcified, and low-density non-calcified plaque burden were performed using semiautomated software. Significant ischemia was defined as invasive FFR ≤0.8. Results: The per-vessel frequency of ischemia was higher in men than women (33.5% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001). Women had a smaller burden of all plaque subtypes (all p < 0.01). There was no sex difference on total, calcified, or non-calcified plaque burdens in vessels with ischemia; only low-density non-calcified plaque burden was significantly lower in women (beta: -0.183, p = 0.035). The burdens of all plaque subtypes were independently associated with ischemia in both men and women (For total plaque burden (5% increase): Men, OR: 1.15, 95%CI: 1.06-1.24, p = 0.001; Women, OR: 1.96, 95%CI: 1.11-3.46, p = 0.02). No significant interaction existed between sex and total plaque burden for predicting ischemia (interaction p = 0.108). The addition of quantitative plaque burdens to stenosis severity and adverse plaque characteristics improved the discrimination of ischemia in both men and women. Conclusions: In symptomatic patients with suspected CAD, women have a lower CCTA-derived burden of all plaque subtypes compared to men. Quantitative plaque burden provides independent and incremental predictive value for ischemia, irrespective of sex.