Browsing by Author "Agrawal, Namita"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Analysis of Retrospective Versus Prospective Peer Review in a Multisite Academic Radiation Department(Elsevier, 2023-08-09) Shiue, Kevin R.; Agrawal, Namita; Rhome, Ryan M.; DesRosiers, Colleen M.; Hutchins, Karen M.; Zellars, Richard C.; Watson, Gordon A.; Holmes, Jordan A.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicinePurpose: Our multisite academic radiation department reviewed our experience with transitioning from weekly primarily retrospective to daily primarily prospective peer review to improve plan quality and decrease the rate of plan revisions after treatment start. Methods and materials: This study was an institutional review board-approved prospective comparison of radiation treatment plan review outcomes of plans reviewed weekly (majority within 1 week after treatment start) versus plans reviewed daily (majority before treatment start, except brachytherapy, frame-based radiosurgery, and some emergent plans). Deviations were based on peer comments and considered major if plan revisions were recommended before the next fraction and minor if modifications were suggested but not required. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 distribution tests of independence; means were compared using independent t tests. Results: In all, 798 patients with 1124 plans were reviewed: 611 plans weekly and 513 plans daily. Overall, 76 deviations (6.8%) were noted. Rates of any deviation were increased in the daily era (8.6% vs 5.2%; P = .026), with higher rates of major deviations in the daily era (4.1% vs 1.6%; P = .012). Median working days between initial simulation and treatment was the same across eras (8 days). Deviations led to a plan revision at a higher rate in the daily era (84.1% vs 31.3%; P < .001). Conclusions: Daily prospective peer review is feasible in a multisite academic setting. Daily peer review with emphasis on prospective plan evaluation increased constructive plan feedback, plan revisions, and plan revisions being implemented before treatment start.Item Analysis of Virtual Versus In-Person Prospective Peer Review Workflow in a Multisite Academic Radiation Oncology Department(Elsevier, 2021-11) McClelland, Shearwood III; Amy Achiko, Flora; Bartlett, Gregory K.; Watson, Gordon A.; Holmes, Jordan A.; Rhome, Ryan M.; DesRosiers, Colleen M.; Hutchins, Karen M.; Shiue, Kevin; Agrawal, Namita; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicinePurpose In radiation oncology, peer review is a process where subjective treatment planning decisions are assessed by those independent of the prescribing physician. Before March 2020, all peer review sessions occurred in person; however due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the peer-review workflow was transitioned from in-person to virtual. We sought to assess any differences between virtual versus in-person prospective peer review. Methods and Materials Patients scheduled to receive nonemergent nonprocedural radiation therapy (RT) were presented daily at prospective peer-review before the start of RT administration. Planning software was used, with critical evaluation of several variables including treatment intent, contour definition, treatment target coverage, and risk to critical structures. A deviation was defined as any suggested plan revision. Results In the study, 274 treatment plans evaluated in-person in 2017 to 2018 were compared with 195 plans evaluated virtually in 2021. There were significant differences in palliative intent (36% vs 22%; P = .002), but not in total time between simulation and the start of treatment (9.2 vs 10.0 days; P = .10). Overall deviations (8.0% in-person vs 2.6% virtual; P = .015) were significantly reduced in virtual peer review. Conclusions Prospective daily peer review of radiation oncology treatment plans can be performed virtually with similar timeliness of patient care compared with in-person peer review. A decrease in deviation rate in the virtual peer review setting will need to be further investigated to determine whether virtual workflow can be considered a standard of care.Item Baseline Karnofsky performance status is independently predictive of death within 30 days of intracranial radiation therapy completion for metastatic disease(Elsevier, 2020) McClelland, Shearwood, III.; Agrawal, Namita; Elbanna, May F.; Shiue, Kevin; Bartlett, Gregory K.; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Zellars, Richard C.; Watson, Gordon A.; Ellsworth, Susannah G.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineIntroduction: For patients with brain metastases, palliative radiation therapy (RT) has long been a standard of care for improving quality of life and optimizing intracranial disease control. The duration of time between completion of palliative RT and patient death has rarely been evaluated. Methods: A compilation of two prospective institutional databases encompassing April 2015 through December 2018 was used to identify patients who received palliative intracranial radiation therapy. A multivariate logistic regression model characterized patients adjusting for age, sex, admission status (inpatient versus outpatient), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and radiation therapy indication. Results: 136 consecutive patients received intracranial palliative radiation therapy. Patients with baseline KPS <70 (OR = 2.2; 95%CI = 1.6-3.1; p < 0.0001) were significantly more likely to die within 30 days of treatment. Intracranial palliative radiation therapy was most commonly delivered to provide local control (66% of patients) or alleviate neurologic symptoms (32% of patients), and was most commonly delivered via whole brain radiation therapy in 10 fractions to 30 Gy (38% of patients). Of the 42 patients who died within 30 days of RT, 31 (74%) received at least 10 fractions. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that baseline KPS <70 is independently predictive of death within 30 days of palliative intracranial RT, and that a large majority of patients who died within 30 days received at least 10 fractions. These results indicate that for poor performance status patients requiring palliative intracranial radiation, hypofractionated RT courses should be strongly considered.Item Efficacy of pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery followed by surgical resection and correlative radiobiological analysis for patients with 1-4 brain metastases: study protocol for a phase II trial(Biomed Central, 2018-12-20) Huff, Wei X.; Agrawal, Namita; Shapiro, Scott; Miller, James; Kulwin, Charles; Shah, Mitesh; Savage, Jesse J.; Payner, Troy; Vortmeyer, Alexander; Watson, Gordon; Dey, Mahua; Neurological Surgery, School of MedicineBACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a common adjuvant modality used with surgery for resectable brain metastases (BMs). However, the optimal sequence of the multi-modality therapy has not been established. The goal of the study is to evaluate 6-month local control utilizing pre-operative SRS followed by surgical resection for patients with 1-4 brain metastases. METHODS: This prospective, single arm, phase II trial will recruit patients with up to 4 brain metastases and at least one resectable lesion. All lesions will be treated with SRS and symptomatic lesions will be resected within 1-4 days after SRS. Patients will be monitored for 6-month local control, in-brain progression free survival, distant in-brain failure, rate of leptomeningeal spread, radiation necrosis and overall survival. Additionally, we will also perform correlative radiobiological molecular studies to assess the effect of radiation dosing on the tumor tissue and clinical outcomes. We expect that pre-operative SRS to the gross tumor prior to surgical resection will improve local control and decrease leptomeningeal failure. DISCUSSION: Our study is the second prospective trial to investigate the efficacy of pre-operative SRS in the treatment of multiple BMs. In addition, the correlative molecular studies will be the first to investigate early response of BMs at a cellular and genetic level in response to radiation doses and potentially provide molecular prognostic markers for local control and overall survival.Item Genomic analysis of human brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery reveals unique signature based on treatment failure(Elsevier, 2024-03-27) Shireman, Jack M.; White, Quinn; Ni, Zijian; Mohanty, Chitrasen; Cai, Yujia; Zhao, Lei; Agrawal, Namita; Gonugunta, Nikita; Wang, Xiaohu; Mccarthy, Liam; Kasulabada, Varshitha; Pattnaik, Akshita; Ahmed, Atique U.; Miller, James; Kulwin, Charles; Cohen-Gadol, Aaron; Payner, Troy; Lin, Chih-Ta; Savage, Jesse J.; Lane, Brandon; Shiue, Kevin; Kamer, Aaron; Shah, Mitesh; Iyer, Gopal; Watson, Gordon; Kendziorski, Christina; Dey, Mahua; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of limited brain metastasis (BM); however, the effects of SRS on human brain metastases have yet to be studied. We performed genomic analysis on resected brain metastases from patients whose resected lesion was previously treated with SRS. Our analyses demonstrated for the first time that patients possess a distinct genomic signature based on type of treatment failure including local failure, leptomeningeal spread, and radio-necrosis. Examination of the center and peripheral edge of the tumors treated with SRS indicated differential DNA damage distribution and an enrichment for tumor suppressor mutations and DNA damage repair pathways along the peripheral edge. Furthermore, the two clinical modalities used to deliver SRS, LINAC and GK, demonstrated differential effects on the tumor landscape even between controlled primary sites. Our study provides, in human, biological evidence of differential effects of SRS across BM's.Item Genomic Analysis of Human Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery Under the Phase-II Clinical Trial (NCT03398694) Reveals DNA Damage Repair at the Peripheral Tumor Edge(medRxiv, 2023-04-24) Shireman, Jack M.; White, Quinn; Agrawal, Namita; Ni, Zijian; Chen, Grace; Zhao, Lei; Gonugunta, Nikita; Wang, Xiaohu; Mccarthy, Liam; Kasulabada, Varshitha; Pattnaik, Akshita; Ahmed, Atique U.; Miller, James; Kulwin, Charles; Cohen-Gadol, Aaron; Payner, Troy; Lin, Chih-Ta; Savage, Jesse J.; Lane, Brandon; Shiue, Kevin; Kamer, Aaron; Shah, Mitesh; Iyer, Gopal; Watson, Gordon; Kendziorski, Christina; Dey, Mahua; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineStereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the leading treatment modalities for oligo brain metastasis (BM), however no comprehensive genomic data assessing the effect of radiation on BM in humans exist. Leveraging a unique opportunity, as part of the clinical trial (NCT03398694), we collected post-SRS, delivered via Gamma-knife or LINAC, tumor samples from core and peripheral-edges of the resected tumor to characterize the genomic effects of overall SRS as well as the SRS delivery modality. Using these rare patient samples, we show that SRS results in significant genomic changes at DNA and RNA levels throughout the tumor. Mutations and expression profiles of peripheral tumor samples indicated interaction with surrounding brain tissue as well as elevated DNA damage repair. Central samples show GSEA enrichment for cellular apoptosis while peripheral samples carried an increase in tumor suppressor mutations. There are significant differences in the transcriptomic profile at the periphery between Gamma-knife vs LINAC.Item Histology, Tumor Volume, and Radiation Dose Predict Outcomes in NSCLC Patients After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy(Elsevier, 2018) Shiue, Kevin; Cerra-Franco, Alberto; Shapiro, Ronald; Estabrook, Neil; Mannina, Edward M.; Deig, Christopher R.; Althouse, Sandra; Liu, Sheng; Wan, Jun; Zang, Yong; Agrawal, Namita; Ioannides, Pericles; Liu, Yongmei; Zhang, Chen; DesRosiers, Colleen; Bartlett, Greg; Ewing, Marvene; Langer, Mark P.; Watson, Gordon; Zellars, Richard; Kong, Feng-Ming; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineIntroduction It remains unclear if histology should be independently considered when choosing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy dose prescriptions for NSCLC. Methods The study population included 508 patients with 561 lesions between 2000 and 2016, of which 442 patients with 482 lesions had complete dosimetric information. Eligible patients had histologically or clinically diagnosed early-stage NSCLC and were treated with 3 to 5 fractions. The primary endpoint was in-field tumor control censored by either death or progression. Involved lobe control was also assessed. Results At 6.7 years median follow-up, 3-year in-field control, involved lobe control, overall survival, and progression-free survival rates were 88.1%, 80.0%, 49.4%, and 37.2%, respectively. Gross tumor volume (GTV) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01 per mL, p = 0.0044) and histology (p = 0.0225) were independently associated with involved lobe failure. GTV (HR = 1.013, p = 0.001) and GTV dose (cutoff of 110 Gy, biologically effective dose with α/β = 10 [BED10], HR = 2.380, p = 0.0084) were independently associated with in-field failure. For squamous cell carcinomas, lower prescription doses were associated with worse in-field control (12 Gy × 4 or 10 Gy × 5 versus 18 Gy or 20 Gy × 3: HR = 3.530, p = 0.0447, confirmed by propensity score matching) and was independent of GTV (HR = 1.014 per mL, 95% confidence interval: 1.005–1.022, p = 0.0012). For adenocarcinomas, there were no differences in in-field control observed using the above dose groupings (p = 0.12 and p = 0.31, respectively). Conclusions In the absence of level I data, GTV and histology should be considered to personalize radiation dose for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. We suggest lower prescription doses (i.e., 12 Gy × 4 or 10 G × 5) should be avoided for squamous cell carcinomas if normal tissue tolerances are met.Item Impact of Lung Parenchymal-Only Failure on Overall Survival in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy(Elsevier, 2021) Elbanna, May; Shiue, Kevin; Edwards, Donna; Cerra-Franco, Alberto; Agrawal, Namita; Hinton, Jason; Mereniuk, Todd; Huang, Christina; Ryan, Joshua L.; Smith, Jessica; Aaron, Vasantha D.; Burney, Heather; Zang, Yong; Holmes, Jordan; Langer, Mark; Zellars, Richard; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineIntroduction: The impact of lung parenchymal-only failure on patient survival after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Patients and methods: The study population included 481 patients with early-stage NSCLC who were treated with 3- to 5-fraction SABR between 2000 and 2016. The primary study objective was to assess the impact of out-of-field lung parenchymal-only failure (OLPF) on overall survival (OS). Results: At a median follow-up of 5.9 years, the median OS was 2.7 years for all patients. Patients with OLPF did not have a significantly different OS compared to patients without failure (P = .0952, median OS 4.1 years with failure vs. 2.6 years never failure). Analysis in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort for Karnofsky performance status, comorbidity score, and smoking status showed no differences in OS between patients without failure and those with OLPF (P = .8). In subgroup analyses exploring the impact of time of failure on OS, patients with OLPF 6 months or more after diagnosis did not have significantly different OS compared to those without failure, when accounting for immortal time bias (P = .3, median OS 4.3 years vs. 3.5 years never failure). Only 7 patients in our data set experienced failure within 6 months of treatment, of which only 4 were confirmed to be true failures; therefore, limited data are available in our cohort on the impact of OLPF for ≤ 6 months on OS. Conclusion: OLPF after SABR for early-stage NSCLC does not appear to adversely affect OS, especially if occurring at least 6 months after SABR. More studies are needed to understand if OLPF within 6 months of SABR is associated with adverse OS. These data are useful when discussing prognosis of lung parenchymal failures after initial SABR.Item Nearly Half of Metastatic Brain Disease Patients Prescribed 10 Fractions of Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy Die Without Completing Treatment(Elsevier, 2019) McClelland, Shearwood, III; Agrawal, Namita; Shiue, Kevin; Bartlett, Gregory K.; Zellars, Richard C.; Watson, Gordon A.; Ellsworth, Susannah G.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineItem Radiosurgery dose reduction for brain metastases on immunotherapy (RADREMI): A prospective phase I study protocol(Elsevier, 2020) McClelland, Shearwood, III.; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Zang, Yong; Hanna, Nasser H.; Shiue, Kevin; Kamer, Aaron P.; Agrawal, Namita; Ellsworth, Susannah G.; Rhome, Ryan M.; Watson, Gordon A.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineIntroduction: Up to 20% of patients with brain metastases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and concomitant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) suffer from symptomatic radiation necrosis. The goal of this study is to evaluate Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Brain Metastases on Immunotherapy (RADREMI) on six-month symptomatic radiation necrosis rates. Methods: This study is a prospective single arm Phase I pilot study which will recruit patients with brain metastases receiving ICI delivered within 30 days before SRS. All patients will be treated with RADREMI dosing, which involves SRS doses of 18 Gy for 0-2 cm lesions, 14 Gy for 2.1-3 cm lesions, and 12 Gy for 3.1-4 cm lesions. All patients will be monitored for six-month symptomatic radiation necrosis (defined as a six-month rate of clinical symptomatology requiring steroid administration and/or operative intervention concomitant with imaging findings consistent with radiation necrosis) and six-month local control. We expect that RADREMI dosing will significantly reduce the symptomatic radiation necrosis rate of concomitant SRS + ICI without significantly sacrificing the local control obtained by the present RTOG 90-05 SRS dosing schema. Local control will be defined according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Discussion: This study is the first prospective trial to investigate the safety of dose-reduced SRS in treatment of brain metastases with concomitant ICI. The findings should provide fertile soil for future multi-institutional collaborative efficacy trials of RADREMI dosing for this patient population.