Fillmore, Erin P.Brokaw, James J.Kochhar, KomalNalin, Peter M.2023-02-172023-02-172016-07Anatomical Sciences Education 9:307-318, 2016https://hdl.handle.net/1805/31291A mixed methods survey of fourth year medical students, resident physicians, and residency program directors at the Indiana University School of Medicine gathered perceptions of anatomical competence—defined as the anatomical education necessary for effective clinical practice. The survey items explored numerous aspects of anatomical competence, including the most effective modes of instruction, perceptions of readiness for clinical practice, and specific suggestions for improving anatomical education during medical school and residency. The response rate was 46% for fourth year medical students, 47% for residents (as graduates from 137 medical schools), and 71% for program directors. A majority of students and residents reported the following: that their course in Gross Anatomy prepared them well for clinical practice; that cadaveric dissection was important in the early development of their anatomical competence; and that placing a greater emphasis on clinical relevance in medical school would have improved their anatomical competence even further. However, in terms of anatomical preparedness upon entering residency, the program directors rated their residents less prepared than the residents rated themselves. All three groups agreed there is need for additional opportunities for anatomical educational during medical school and residency. Suggestions for improving anatomical education included: provide more opportunities for cadaveric dissection during medical school and residency; more consistent teaching of anatomy for clinical practice; more workshops that review anatomy; and better integration of anatomy with the teaching of other subjects during medical school.en-USgross anatomy educationmedical educationanatomical competenceperception of anatomy knowledgeresidency educationresidency directorsadequate preparationclinical practiceArticle