Zillich, Alan J.Jaynes, Heather A.Davis, Hannah B.Lantaff, Wendy M.Myers, JaclynPerkins, Susan M.Shan, MuSnyder, Margie E.2022-03-252022-03-252020-05Zillich, A. J., Jaynes, H. A., Davis, H. B., Lantaff, W. M., Myers, J., Perkins, S. M., Shan, M., & Snyder, M. E. (2020). Evaluation of a “Meds-to-Beds” program on 30-day hospital readmissions. JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 3(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1183https://hdl.handle.net/1805/28303Background Effective programs for transitional care from hospital to home are needed to improve patient outcomes. Purpose To evaluate readmissions among patients who received a medication discharge program compared with control patients who did not receive the program. Methods This was a retrospective, observational cohort study during a 1-year period in a medium-sized Midwestern health system. The “meds-to-beds” program consisted of a pharmacist and/or technician delivering patient's medications to bedside prior to discharge. When indicated, the pharmacist provided medication counseling, reviewed discharge medications, and provided an updated medication list to patients. The intervention cohort was defined as all hospitalized patients eligible for and opting into the “meds-to-beds” program. The control cohort was defined as hospitalized patients eligible for the program who did not opt-in to receive it. Data were collected through both a retrospective chart review and an administrative claims data warehouse. The primary outcome was defined as any 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes were defined as any preventable 30-day readmissions using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's potentially avoidable hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions classification. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the odds of 30-day readmissions between the intervention and control groups. Results Data were collected for 500 intervention and 1591 control patients. Both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, race, co-morbid conditions, and previous health care utilization. In the multivariable model, all-cause readmissions within 30 days were not significantly different between the intervention and control groups (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-1.07, P = .09). The most common preventable readmissions were for pneumonia (43.2%), heart failure (18.9%), and dehydration (16.2%). In the multivariable model, patients in the intervention group were less likely to be readmitted for a preventable cause within 30-days than patients in the control group (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.28-0.89, P = .02). Conclusion This “meds-to-beds” program was not associated with a significant reduction in 30-day all-cause readmissions but was associated with a reduction in 30-day preventable hospital readmissions.enPublisher Policytransitions of carepharmacymedicationsEvaluation of a “Meds-to-Beds” program on 30-day hospital readmissionsArticle