Li, H.Islam, M.Yu, H.Du, X.2023-11-172023-11-172022-07-01Li, H., Islam, M., Yu, H., & Du, X. Physics-Based Regression vs. CFD for Hagen-Poiseuille and Womersley Flows and Uncertainty Quantification. Eleventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD11). https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10381940-physics-based-regression-vs-cfd-hagen-poiseuille-womersley-flows-uncertainty-quantificationhttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/37117Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and its uncertainty quantification are computationally expensive. We use Gaussian Process (GP) methods to demonstrate that machine learning can build efficient and accurate surrogate models to replace CFD simulations with significantly reduced computational cost without compromising the physical accuracy. We also demonstrate that both epistemic uncertainty (machine learning model uncertainty) and aleatory uncertainty (randomness in the inputs of CFD) can be accommodated when the machine learning model is used to reveal fluid dynamics. The demonstration is performed by applying simulation of Hagen-Poiseuille and Womersley flows that involve spatial and spatial-tempo responses, respectively. Training points are generated by using the analytical solutions with evenly discretized spatial or spatial-temporal variables. Then GP surrogate models are built using supervised machine learning regression. The error of the GP model is quantified by the estimated epistemic uncertainty. The results are compared with those from GPU-accelerated volumetric lattice Boltzmann simulations. The results indicate that surrogate models can produce accurate fluid dynamics (without CFD simulations) with quantified uncertainty when both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties exist.en-USPublisher PolicySupervised Machine LearningComputational Fluid DynamicsVolumetric lattice Boltzmann methodSurrogate ModelUncertainty QuantificationConference proceedings