Martinez-Mier, Esperanza AngelesAl Dehailan, Laila AdelLippert, FrankSoto-Rojas, Armando E.González-Cabezas, CarlosStelzner, Sarah2016-09-202017-09-082015-11-12https://hdl.handle.net/1805/11002http://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/1559Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)The majority of currently marketed fluoride varnishes (FV) have not been evaluated for their effectiveness in preventing dental caries. Fundamental research on FVs and how different formulations affect adherence to teeth, fluoride release into saliva and uptake by teeth is virtually non-existent. The objective of this work was to investigate the anti-caries potential, measured as fluoride release into saliva, change in surface microhardness of early enamel caries lesions, and enamel fluoride uptake, of multiple commercially available FVs. We have found that FVs differed in their release characteristics, rehardening capability, and ability to deliver fluoride to demineralized lesions. In addition to our in vitro work, we have conducted a clinical study that aimed to compare saliva and plaque fluid fluoride concentrations following the application of three commercially available FV treatments at predetermined post application time points. We also investigated the change in fluoride concentration in saliva and plaque fluid fluoride from baseline to each post application predetermined time point. We found that FVs varied in their release of fluoride into saliva and plaque fluid but shared common trends in release characteristics. The outcomes of our in vitro and in vivo investigations demonstrate a great variation in anti-caries potential of FVs. This may be attributed to different compositions and physical properties of the tested FVs.en-USFluoride releaseFluoride varnishMicrohardnessPlaque fluidSalivaFlouride varnishesDental caries -- PreventionSalivaTeeth -- Care and hygieneDental enamelTeeth -- ErosionDental plaqueSalivaDental CariesDental EnamelDental PlaqueDissertation10.7912/C2VC81