Thomas, JacobZiemba-Davis, MaryMeneghini, R. Michael2024-09-162024-09-162022-07-22https://hdl.handle.net/1805/43329Background and Hypothesis: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is treated with implant resection, debridement, and component reimplantation after infection eradication. Treatment consists of either a single surgery or two-stage surgery with intravenous antibiotic therapy between stages. We replicated a recent study which concluded two-stage treatment is associated with high morbidity, hypothesizing that complication rates would be similar, but that morbidity is not always conclusively a consequence of two-stage treatment for PJI Project Methods: Prospectively documented data on all primary and revision knees undergoing two-stage treatment for PJI by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical complications were quantified for the interstage and post-reimplantation periods. Chi-squared tests were used to compare current findings to published findings. Results: Patient demographics and comorbidities were equivalent in the two studies (p ≥ .137). More complex infections characterized the current study as evidenced by significantly more polymicrobial infections (p < .001) and greater use of static spacers due to bone loss (p = .002). Nonetheless, only 1.5% of cases in the current study did not undergo component reimplantation compared to 7.8% in the comparison study (p = .129). There were no differences in the number of additional interstage and post-reimplantation septic surgeries (p ≥ .492). Using a proposed system which penalizes additional operations required to eradicate infection, treatment success rates at minimum one year follow-up were 64% and 71%, respectively (p = .473). Without these penalties, treatment success in the current study was 95.6% (equivalent proportion not available for comparison study). All-cause mortality was statistically equivalent in the two studies (15.6 versus 7.6%, p = .144) but no deaths from PJI were observed in the current study (unknown for comparison study). Potential Impact: Study findings suggest that morbidity attributed to two-stage treatment reflect the inherent complexity of this patient group, and not the two-stage treatment itself.en-USAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalOrthopaedic SurgeryTotal Knee InfectionTotal Knee ArthroplastyOrthopedic SurgeryTwo-stagePoster