Whitney, Kriscinda A.Davis, Jeremy J.2016-04-282016-04-282015-03Whitney, K. A., & Davis, J. J. (2015). The Non-Credible Score of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: Is It Better at Predicting Non-Credible Neuropsychological Test Performance Than the RAVLT Recognition Score? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30(2), 130–138. http://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu094https://hdl.handle.net/1805/9446The ability of both the non-credible score of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT NC) and the recognition score of the RAVLT (RAVLT Recog) to predict credible versus non-credible neuropsychological test performance was examined. Credible versus non-credible group membership was determined according to diagnostic criteria with consideration of performance on two stand-alone performance validity tests. Findings from this retrospective data analysis of outpatients seen for neuropsychological testing within a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (N = 175) showed that RAVLT Recog demonstrated better classification accuracy than RAVLT NC in predicting credible versus non-credible neuropsychological test performance. Specifically, an RAVLT Recog cutoff of ≤9 resulted in reasonable sensitivity (48%) and acceptable specificity (91%) in predicting non-credible neuropsychological test performance. Implications for clinical practice are discussed. Note: The views contained here within are those of the authors and not representative of the institutions with which they are associated.enCC0 1.0 Universaltest validityneuropsychologymilitary veteransArticle