Meints, Samantha M.Hirsh, Adam T.2015-08-192015-08-192015-05Meints, S. M., & Hirsh, A. T. (2015). In Vivo Praying and Catastrophizing Mediate the Race Differences in Experimental Pain Sensitivity. The Journal of Pain, 16(5), 491-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2015.02.005https://hdl.handle.net/1805/6655Black individuals have a lower tolerance for experimental pain than white individuals. Black and white individuals also differ in their use of pain coping strategies, which may explain the race differences in pain sensitivity. We examined the extent to which situation-specific pain coping mediated black-white differences in pain sensitivity. We hypothesized that 1) black participants would demonstrate lower pain tolerance than white participants, 2) black participants would use different pain coping strategies than white participants, and 3) the differential use of these strategies would mediate the relationship between race and pain tolerance. Healthy college undergraduates (N = 190) participated in a cold pressor task and then completed the Coping Strategies Questionnaire–Revised to assess their situation-specific pain coping. Compared with white participants, black participants demonstrated lower pain tolerance, engaged in more situation-specific catastrophizing and praying, and ignored pain less frequently. Catastrophizing and praying were inversely related to pain tolerance and were significant mediators of the relationship between race and pain tolerance. The indirect effect of praying was stronger than that of catastrophizing. Race differences in pain sensitivity may be due, in part, to differences in the use of catastrophizing and praying as coping strategies. These results may help guide treatments addressing maladaptive pain coping.en-USIUPUI Open Access PolicyracecatastrophizingprayingIn-vivo praying and catastrophizing mediate the race differences in experimental pain sensitivityArticle