Cohee, Andrea A.Krueger, Ellen F.Vachon, Eric A.Cottingham, Ann H.Stutz, Patrick V.Alwine, Jennifer S.Johns, Shelley A.2021-10-042021-10-042021Cohee, A. A., Krueger, E. F., Vachon, E. A., Cottingham, A. H., Stutz, P. V., Alwine, J. S., & Johns, S. A. (2021). Breast cancer survivors’ perceptions of their partners’ interest in cancer-focused psychosocial interventions. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research and Practice, 3(1), e042.https://hdl.handle.net/1805/26688Background: Despite that partners of breast cancer survivors (BCS) often experience long-term consequences from the cancer experience, including fear of recurrence and depression, there are rarely psychosocial interventions aimed at mitigating these consequences. Because partners are usually recruited to research studies through BCS, it is important to understand the views of BCS regarding their partners’ involvement in interventions. The aim of this study was to explore perceptions of BCS regarding the advisability of offering a psychosocial intervention to their partners. Methods: BCS (N = 22) enrolled in 1 of 3 interventions (acceptance and commitment therapy [ACT], survivorship education [SE], or enhanced usual care [EUC]) were queried about whether they believed their partner would be interested in a psychosocial intervention similar to what they had just completed and asked to provide their opinions about how a partner intervention should be structured and what it should address. Twenty-two BCS (ACT group [n = 5], SE [n = 11], and EUC [n = 6]) completed the interviews. Results: The participants identified 3 unmet partner needs that they thought could be addressed by a psychosocial intervention: problems with coping, communication breakdowns, and lack of information. They also provided 3 recommendations regarding the development of a partner intervention: the use of a group format, the provision of separate sessions for partners and BCS, and the inclusion of intervention components that provide practical or factual information related to breast cancer. Conclusions: BCS can provide valuable insights that can inform the development of psychosocial interventions for partners of survivors. The development of such partner interventions is critical to address the negative and often hidden health and social effects experienced by partners of BCS.en-USAttribution 4.0 InternationalAcceptance and commitment therapyBreast cancer survivorsInterventionPartnersPsychosocialSpousesSurvivorship educationBreast cancer survivors’ perceptions of their partners’ interest in cancer-focused psychosocial interventionsArticle