Imperiale, Thomas F.Abhyankar, Priya R.Stump, Timothy E.Emmett, Thomas W.2018-10-112018-10-112018Imperiale, T. F., Abhyankar, P. R., Stump, T. E., & Emmett, T. W. (2018). Prevalence of Advanced, Precancerous Colorectal Neoplasms in Black and White Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.020https://hdl.handle.net/1805/17492Background & Aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are higher in black vs white populations. The reasons for these disparities are not clear, yet some guidelines recommend screening black persons for CRC starting at ages 40–45 years. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the prevalence of advanced adenomas (AAs) and advanced, precancerous colorectal neoplasms (ACNs) between asymptomatic black and white screen-eligible adults. Methods We searched Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify articles (published from 1946 through June 2017) that reported prevalence values of AA or ACN in average-risk black and white individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy. Two authors independently assessed study quality and risk for bias using a modified validated quality assessment instrument. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 2 authors independently abstracted descriptive and quantitative data from each study. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to determine risk differences and odds ratios (ORs). Results From 1653 articles, we identified 9 studies for analysis, comprising 302,128 individuals. Six of the 9 studies were of high methodological quality, had a low risk for bias, and were included in the meta-analysis. In these 9 studies, the overall prevalence values for AA and ACN did not differ significantly between back (6.57%) and white screened individuals (6.20%; OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81–1.30). Among a subgroup of 5 studies, the prevalence of proximal AA and ACN was significantly higher in black (3.30%) than in white screened individuals (2.42%; OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.12–1.30). Excluding the largest study did not affect overall prevalence (OR, 0.99; CI, 0.73–1.34) but eliminated the difference in prevalence of proximal AA or ACN (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.87–2.52). Conclusions In a meta-analysis, we found the overall prevalence of AA and ACN did not differ significantly between average-risk black and white persons, indicating that the age at which to begin CRC screening need not differ based on race.enPublisher Policycolon cancerincidenceethnicity differencesArticle