Dwyer, Patrick C.Chang, Yen-PingHannay, JasonAlgoe, Sara B.2019-12-312019-12-312019-09-05Dwyer, P. C., Chang, Y. P., Hannay, J., & Algoe, S. B. (2019). When does activism benefit well-being? Evidence from a longitudinal study of Clinton voters in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. PloS one, 14(9), e0221754. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221754https://hdl.handle.net/1805/21658Contrary to the expectations of many, Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The initial shock to her supporters turned into despair for most, but not everyone was affected equally. We draw from the literature on political activism, identity, and self-other overlap in predicting that not all Clinton voters would be equivalently crushed by her loss. Specifically, we hypothesize that pre-election measures of political activism, and level of self-other identification between participants and Clinton-that is, how much a person was "with her"-will interact to predict the level of distress of Clinton voters two months later. Longitudinal data support our hypothesis. Notably, among Clinton voters, greater activism negatively predicted depressive symptoms, and positively predicted sleep quality, but only when participants were highly identified with Clinton. We discuss the implications of the results for theory and research on social action and well-being.en-USHillary Clinton2016 U.S. presidential electionPolitical activismSocial actionArticle