Meslin, Eric M.Alpert, Sheri A.Carroll, Aaron E.Odell, Jere D.Schwartz, Peter H.2012-08-312012-08-312012-08-31https://hdl.handle.net/1805/2936https://doi.org/10.7912/C27H15Patient advocates and leaders in informatics have long proposed that patients should have greater ability to control the information in their electronic health record (EHR), including how it can be accessed by their health care providers. The value of such “granular” control, as it has been termed, has been supported prominently in an influential report by the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). Recently, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) funded several projects to study key components of EHR systems, including exploring ways to allow granular control. This “Points to Consider” document provides an overview of the benefits, risks and challenges of granular control of EHRs; a review of the key ethical principles, values, and Fair Information Practices that ought to guide development of an EHR that accommodates granular control, and seven detailed Points to Consider to guide decision making.AutonomyConfidentialityElectronic health recordsEthicsMedical records systemsPatientsPhysician-patient relationsPrivacyTechnical Report10.7912/C27H15