Bell, KameronCook, MyannaKarki, SabinSakbun, Vannara2024-07-152024-07-152024-03-22Bell K, Cook M, Karki S, Sakbun V. (2024, March 22). A Case of Uterine Sarcoma: The Impact of Insurance Policy on Timely Access to Hysterectomy [Oral Presentation]. American Medical Women's Association 109th Annual Meeting. Virtual.https://hdl.handle.net/1805/42210Background: Uterine sarcoma, a uterine cancer subtype, is a rare, aggressive malignancy with non-specific symptoms, complicating early diagnosis and management. Its common symptom, abnormal uterine bleeding, can be mistaken for benign uterine fibroids, leading to treatment delays and poor prognosis. Case: A 41-year-old premenopausal female with a smoking history presented with persistent heavy uterine bleeding for over 6 months. Physical examination and transvaginal ultrasound suggested a 13-week gestational size bulky uterus and a 6.3 x 7.32 cm intrauterine fibroid, respectively. Despite these findings, hysterectomy request was denied by insurance. After a year of continued bleeding, insurance approved the surgery. During the robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, anterior and sidewall adhesions raised malignancy suspicion. The surgical team performed a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and right colectomy. Post-operative pathology confirmed uterine sarcoma. Clinical Significance: This case highlights the impact of insurance decisions on patient care, emphasizing timely interventions' necessity and the challenges in distinguishing benign fibroids from uterine malignancy in symptomatic patients. Current literature underscores the diagnostic dilemma surrounding uterine sarcoma, especially differentiating it from benign uterine fibroids. A significant literature gap exists regarding insurance policy impact on accessing timely surgical interventions like hysterectomy, affecting uterine sarcoma prognosis and management. Conclusion: Abnormal uterine bleeding can indicate benign uterine fibroids or uterine sarcoma. In this case, the lack of alternative diagnostics and poor imaging differentiation necessitated a hysterectomy for diagnosis. The delay in insurance approval for surgery underscored the significant impact of insurance decisions on patient care, potentially exacerbating the prognosis and delaying necessary intervention for uterine sarcoma.Presentation