Dean, Jeffrey A.Minutillo, Anthony L., 1965-Bowman, DennisMoore, B. KeithSanders, Brian S.Avery, David R.2013-11-182013-11-181996https://hdl.handle.net/1805/3683http://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/1675Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)This investigation examined the relationships among light cured glass ionomer liner, light cured glass ionomer base, and composite resin material in the reattachment of fractured anterior tooth fragments. Seventy-five bovine incisor teeth were fractured and luted back together with three different materials (Universal Bonding Agent/TPH Composite Resin; VariGlass VLC Liner; VariGlass VLC Base, LD Caulk Div Dentsply Int Inc, Milford, DE) of equal number. The reattached fragments were subjected to thermocycling with a 40° C differential and then were loaded until the force required to detach the fragment was reached. The mean dislodgment strengths were 36.8 (± 25.6)kg for the composite resin, 36.4 (± 26.7)kg for the glass ionomer base, and 31.4 (± 29.S)kg for the glass ionomer liner. Analysis of variance demonstrated no significant difference between the three groups at p≤0.05. Also examined was the type of fracture after reattachment. Of the sixty-five teeth that were studied microscopically, 84.6 percent of the fractures were cohesive in nature, thus a breakdown occurred within the material itself.en-USTooth fractures -- in infancy & childhoodGlass Ionomer CementsDental BondingThesis