Nikolaou, AndreasAmbavane, ApoorvaShah, AnshulMa, WenkangTosh, JonKapetanakis, VenediktosWillson, JennyWang, FengHogea, CosminaGorsh, BorisGutierrez, BenSapra, SandhyaSuvannasankha, AttayaSamyshkin, Yevgeniy2024-04-052024-04-052021Nikolaou A, Ambavane A, Shah A, et al. Belantamab mafodotin for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in heavily pretreated patients: a US cost-effectiveness analysis. Expert Rev Hematol. 2021;14(12):1137-1145. doi:10.1080/17474086.2021.1970522https://hdl.handle.net/1805/39807Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) require several lines of therapy, with typically shorter remission duration with each additional line. Research design and methods: The cost-effectiveness of belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; DREAMM-2; NCT03525678) was compared with selinexor plus dexamethasone (SEL+DEX; STORM Part 2; NCT02336815) among patients with RRMM who have received at least four prior therapies. The base case used a US commercial payer's perspective over a 10-year time horizon. Efficacy data were based on parametric survival analysis of DREAMM-2 and matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison between DREAMM-2 and STORM Part 2, which assessed relative treatment effects between belamaf and SEL+DEX. Cost inputs included drug treatment, concomitant medications, adverse event management, subsequent treatments, and disease management. Results: Belamaf decreased total treatment costs per patient by $14,267 and increased patient life years by 0.74 and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.49 versus SEL+DEX. Patients receiving belamaf accrued 0.12 fewer progression-free life years versus patients on SEL+DEX. Conclusions: From a US commercial payer's perspective, belamaf had lower costs, and increased QALYs and life-year gain, compared with SEL+DEX. Belamaf is therefore likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with RRMM who have received four or more prior lines of therapy.en-USAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalCost-effectivenessHRQoLRRMMEfficacyModelingSafetyArticle