Coates, Heather L.Hinrichs, Rachel J.Lowe, M. SaraStone, Sean M.2022-05-042022-05-042022-05Coates, H. L., Hinrichs, R. J., Lowe, M. S., Stone, S. M. (2022). Studying the Research to Transform Library and Information Science Literature. Presentation at the International Conference on Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (virtual).https://hdl.handle.net/1805/28836Introduction: The quality of research of a human service discipline such as library and information science (LIS) affects not only other researchers but also practitioners. Librarians depend upon reliable, evidence-based information about the needs, preferences, and experiences of our patrons to provide relevant and effective services. A strong body of evidence is foundational for making data-informed decisions and in demonstrating the value of library services. It also enhances the ability of LIS practitioners and researchers to build upon and apply research findings. This pilot project was designed to inform the development of a set of reporting guidelines for LIS research, which has the potential to reduce bias in publishing and peer review as well as improve the LIS scholarly record as a source of evidence. Reporting guidelines provide evidence-based specifications of the minimum set of information required to report the results of various study types, helping to ensure transparent and comprehensive reporting of research. Guidelines would support librarians in critically appraising the literature for re-use in their practice as well as offering a stronger foundation on which to build future research. Reporting guidelines are a much needed tool for LIS professionals in many capacities – as authors, editors and readers. Methods: Using a stratified sample of articles indexed in the Library, Information Science, and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) database, we evaluated the reporting quality of LIS articles. Items such as newspaper articles, editorial front matter, and items not relevant to LIS were excluded. Each article was evaluated by two coders. Discrepancies between coders on relevance, setting, topics, research type, methods, and evidence were resolved via discussion to reach consensus. Results: This session will report preliminary results including descriptive statistics and correlations between quality of reporting, library setting, types of research conducted, and publication type. Additionally, we will identify common mistakes made in reporting.en-USAttribution 4.0 InternationalLibrary and Information ScienceresearchEvidence Based Library and Information Practicelibrary researchresearch reportingPresentation