Cohen, Ricardo V.Pereira, Tiago VeigaAboud, Cristina MamédioPetry, Tarissa Beatrice ZanataCorrea, José Luis LopesSchiavon, Carlos AurélioPompílio, Carlos EduardoPechy, Fernando Nogueira Quirinoda Costa Silva, Ana Carolina Calmonda Silveira, Lívia Porto Cunhade Paris Caravatto, Pedro PauloHalpern, Heliode Lima Jacy Monteiro, Fredericoda Costa Martins, BrunoKuga, RogerioPalumbo, Thais Mantovani SarianFriedman, Allon N.le Roux, Carel W.2023-10-112023-10-112022-11-11Cohen RV, Pereira TV, Aboud CM, et al. Gastric bypass versus best medical treatment for diabetic kidney disease: 5 years follow up of a single-centre open label randomised controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;53:101725. Published 2022 Nov 11. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101725https://hdl.handle.net/1805/36282Background: We compared the albuminuria-lowering effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) to best medical treatment in patients with diabetic kidney disease and obesity to determine which treatment is better. Methods: A 5 year, open-label, single-centre, randomised trial studied patients with diabetic kidney disease and class I obesity after 1:1 randomization to best medical treatment (n = 49) or RYGB (n = 51). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving remission of microalbuminuria after 5 years. Secondary outcomes included improvements in diabetic kidney disease, glycemic control, quality of life, and safety. For efficacy outcomes, we performed an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01821508. Findings: 88% of patients (44 per arm) completed 5-year follow-up. Remission of albuminuria occurred in 59.6% (95% CI = 45.5-73.8) after best medical treatment and 69.7% (95% CI = 59.6-79.8) after RYGB (risk difference: 10%, 95% CI, -7 to 27, P = 0.25). Patients after RYGB were twice as likely to achieve an HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (60.2% versus 25.4%, risk difference, 34.9%; 95% CI = 15.8-53.9, P < 0.001). Quality of life after five years measured by the 36-Item Short Form Survey questionnaire (standardized to a 0-to-100 scale) was higher in the RYGB group than in the best medical treatment group for several domains. The mean differences were 13.5 (95% CI, 5.5-21.6, P = 0.001) for general health, 19.7 (95% CI, 9.1-30.3, P < 0.001) for pain, 6.1 (95% CI, -4.8 to 17.0, P = 0.27) for social functioning, 8.3 (95% CI, 0.23 to 16.3, P = 0.04) for emotional well-being, 12.2 (95% CI, 3.9-20.4, P = 0.004) for vitality, 16.8 (95% CI, -0.75 to 34.4, P = 0.06) for mental health, 21.8 (95% CI, 4.8-38.7, P = 0.01) for physical health and 11.1 (95% CI, 2.24-19.9, P = 0.01) for physical functioning. Serious adverse events were experienced in 7/46 (15.2%) after best medical treatment and 11/46 patients (24%) after RYGB (P = 0.80). Interpretation: Albuminuria remission was not statistically different between best medical treatment and RYGB after 5 years in participants with diabetic kidney disease and class 1 obesity, with 6-7 in ten patients achieving remission of microalbuminuria (uACR <30 mg/g) in both groups. RYGB was superior in improving glycemia, diastolic blood pressure, lipids, body weight, and quality of life.en-USAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalBariatric surgeryDiabetic kidney diseaseObesityType 2 diabetesGastric bypass versus best medical treatment for diabetic kidney disease: 5 years follow up of a single-centre open label randomised controlled trialArticle