Curley, CaliHarrison, NickyFederman, Peter Stanley2021-10-042021-10-042021-04-21To cite this article: Cali Curley, Nicky Harrison & Peter Federman (2021) Comparing Motivations for Including Enforcement in US COVID-19 State Executive Orders, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23:2, 191-203, DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2021.1880871https://hdl.handle.net/1805/26684The United States’ response to COVID-19 has been predominantly led by state governments. To understand if, why, and how state governments include enforcement language in their executive order response, this article conducts an analysis based on 1,357 coded executive orders. It is found that decisions to include enforcement language are influenced by a governor’s political circumstances and perceived risks associated with the crisis. This paper offers insight into how these findings are important for future research and an explanation of the distinct ways that US state governments are choosing to address COVID-19.en-USenforcementCOVID-19executive ordersArticle