Boerckel, Joel D.Plotkin, Lilian I.Sims, Natalie A.2023-07-312023-07-312021Boerckel JD, Plotkin LI, Sims NA. Editorial Peer Reviewers as Shepherds, Rather Than Gatekeepers. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(7):1220-1224. doi:10.1002/jbmr.4319https://hdl.handle.net/1805/34625The journals of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research [JBMR] and its sister journal JBMR Plus) recognize peer review, whether pre- or post-publication, as an essential guard of scientific integrity and rigor that shapes academic discourse in our field. In this Perspective, we present a vision and philosophy of peer review in a rapidly changing publishing landscape. We emphasize the importance of journal peer reviewers as active players in shaping collegial behavior in the musculoskeletal research community and provide information about benefits and resources available for reviewers and reviewers-in-training. Publishing is becoming increasingly transparent, bringing benefits to authors, to reviewers, and to the scientific community at large. We discuss new initiatives such as transparent peer review and preprint servers, the ways they are changing scientific publishing, and how JBMR is responding to broaden the impact of musculoskeletal research. We emphasize the need to change any perception of peer reviewers as gatekeepers to viewing them as shepherds, who partner with authors and editors in the publishing endeavor. Promoting access, transparency, and collegiality in the way we assess science in our community will elevate its quality, clarify its communication, and increase its societal impact. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).en-USPublisher PolicyPreclinical studiesClinical studiesPractice related issuesPolicy related issuesBone diseasesBone disordersArticle