Shanahan, Mackenzie L.Fischer, Ian C.Rand, Kevin L.2022-01-242022-01-242020Shanahan, M. L., Fischer, I. C., & Rand, K. L. (2020). Hope, optimism, and affect as predictors and consequences of expectancies: The potential moderating roles of perceived control and success. Journal of Research in Personality, 84, 103903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103903https://hdl.handle.net/1805/27549Hope and optimism may be differentially influential depending on the situational context. This study sought to (1) experimentally test whether hope and optimism differentially predict specific expectancies in controllable versus uncontrollable situations and (2) examine the relative impact of specific expectancies on affect when desired outcomes are (or are not) achieved. A 2 × 2 independent samples design was used to experimentally manipulate perceived control and situational outcome (i.e., success or failure). Online participants (N = 571) completed self-report measures of hope and optimism before being randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions. Results showed that hope, but not optimism, predicted specific expectancies in the perceived control condition. Conversely, optimism, but not hope, predicted specific expectancies in the no perceived control condition. More optimistic specific expectancies of success predicted greater positive affect regardless of success or failure outcome.enPublisher PolicyhopeoptimismcontrolHope, Optimism, and Affect as Predictors and Consequences of Expectancies: The Potential Moderating Roles of Perceived Control and SuccessArticle