Hostetter, CarolWood, Leila GraceSullenberger, Sabrina WilliamsonBarton, William H., 1949-Adamek, Margaret E.Sloan, Rebecca S.2015-01-052015-01-052014https://hdl.handle.net/1805/5605http://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/1197Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)Advocacy, in the form of direct service, is a critical type of intervention to help intimate partner or domestic violence survivors. Little is known the best practices for social workers and other helping professionals to assist survivors of domestic violence who present for services at shelters, non-residential outreach, and legal settings. This dissertation reviews relevant research related to domestic violence direct services, which is also called advocacy. The study also outlines a brief overview of the history, theory, and paradigms of thought related to the movement to end intimate partner violence. The research project used the grounded theory method to conduct and analyze semi-structured, in-depth interviews with advocates at domestic violence agency to answer the research question: What constructs and practices inform the delivery of direct services to survivors of domestic violence from shelter and non-residential service advocates? A total of 22 women working primarily with domestic violence survivors in shelters and non-residential agencies participated in the dissertation study. Participants came from one Midwestern and one Southwestern state. The interviewees had a range 1-20 years of experience in the field of domestic violence advocacy. Eighteen of 22 participants had experienced some sort of intimate violence in their lifetime. Several important findings emerged. Advocates typically enter the field because of personal motivations. The empowerment and strengths-based perspective are important to the delivery of advocacy services, as is belief in hope. Advocates typically endorse a survivor centered approach to their work. Data analysis revealed a concurrent process of advocacy that occurs within advocates and between advocates and survivors. This parallel process is marked in the earlier state of assessing and grounding; in the middle stage of establishing and affirming; and the ending stages of hoping and reflecting. These findings suggest the importance of personal experiences, hope, and reflection in the delivery of advocacy services. Community collaboration and support are essential to maintaining services that are aimed at the individual needs of survivors. More research is needed about the perceptions of services among survivors of domestic violence.en-USIntimate Partner Violencedomestic violenceabuseviolence against womensocial justicegrounded theoryadvocacyIntimate partner violence -- Research -- United StatesWomen -- Violence against -- Research -- United StatesWomen -- Violence against -- Research -- Middle WestWomen -- Violence against -- Research -- Southwestern StatesAbused women -- Research -- Middle WestAbused women -- Research -- Southwestern StatesRisk assessment -- ResearchWomen -- Crimes against -- ResearchSocial work with women -- United StatesSocial service -- Research -- MethodologySocial justiceWomen -- Social conditions -- ResearchPower (Social sciences) -- ResearchSocial advocacy -- Research -- Middle WestSocial advocacy -- Research -- Southwestern StatesSocial surveys -- DesignGrounded theory -- ResearchQualitative researchDomestic Violence AdvocacyThesis